The paper “ Principles of Employment Relations” is a meaty example of the literature review on human resources. Employment relations characterize a legal nation that is widely applied in different countries across the globe, to refer to the existing relationship between employees who are obligated to perform certain work within identifiable conditions, in return employers pay remuneration. It is, therefore, through employment that relationships are created and the reciprocal rights and terms of employment by both employee and the employer emerge. The phrase industrial relations first come into use by Britain and North America in the early 1920s.
It has since been joined by personnel management and human resource management. However, the field of industrial relations in recent days has remained in decline in most countries across the globe. Industrial relations have in principle on no account has been restricted for a longer period, until recently where much attention has been directed towards certain parts of the economy. Employment relations involve factors that are put into considerations in ensuring that the relationship between employers and employees is maintained. The relationship contributes to satisfactory production, motivation, and self-confidence.
Basically, the concept is mainly concerned with taking care of the problems involving individuals and which are likely to affect the level of productivity. Information is given to the supervisors on how to correct poor performance and indiscipline among the employees. In such cases, the right disciplinary action based on the stipulated rules and regulations is considered in resolving employee complaints as well as appeals. According to Purcell (2001), the field is much embraced when compared to manufacturing, when including the public sector for instance, however, there still neglect of smaller firms and huge parts of the private sector.
Whether for good or bad reasons in regard to neglect, the situation has since changed, with most of the research conducted addressing the certain growing areas of the economy, a good example being the call centers. Industrial relations are sufficiently embedded considering that it involves relations between administrators and workers in all areas of economic doings.
Grimshaw, D., Ward, K. G., Rubery, J. and Beynon, H. 2001: Organizations and the Transformation of the internal labour market in the UK, Work, Employment and Society,
15 (1), 25–54.
Kathy Monks and John McMackin 2001. Designing and aligning an HR system. Human Resource Management, 11(2), pp. 57–72.
Clark, T., Grant, D. & Heijltjes, M. 2000. Researching comparative and international human resource management, International Studies of Management, 29(4), 6–23.
Kamoche, K. 1996. Strategic human resource management within a resource-capability view of the ﬁrm, Journal of Management Studies, 33(2), 213–33.
Monks, K. & McMackin, J. 2001. Designing and aligning an HR system, Human Resource Manage-ment Journal, 11(2), 57–72.
Purcell, J. 2001. The meaning of strategy in human resource management, In J. Storey (ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (pp. 59–77). London: Thompson Learning.
Heery, E., and Salmon, J. 2000: The insecurity thesis. In E. Heery and J. Salmon (eds),
The Insecure Workforce. London: Routledge.
Scullion, H. 2001. International human resource management, In J. Storey (ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (pp. 288–313). London: Thompson Learning.
Brewster, C. (2001). HRM: The comparative dimension. In J. Storey (ed.), Human resource manage-ment: A critical text (pp. 255–71). London: Thompson Learning.
Redman, T., and Wilkinson, A. 2001: Contemporary Human Resource Management.
London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.