Essays on Public Involved in the IKEA Product Recall Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Public Involved in the IKEA Product Recall" is a good example of a marketing case study. Product recall takes place when a product violates consumer product safety regulations. This is often carried out in order to limit the blame for corporate negligence and for protecting the business reputation. A product recall is a public concern because it concerns business reputation. While product recalls can ruin the company’ s image if not properly managed, public relations seeks to ensure this image is well protected. The public involvement in the product recall includes government agencies, staff and the employees of the concerned company, other businesses involved in the distribution channel and the consumers.

It is important to maintain business-to-business communications because this helps in maintaining the image of the company. Some of the ethical and legal issues involved in product recall include honesty, truthfulness, fairness and adherence to the legal requirements. However, product recalls often encounter significant problems such as misinterpretation, and exaggerations, especially by the media. An important point to note is that communication efforts can only be considered successful if they are incorporated in responsible behaviour, since this can continue to ruin the company’ s image. 1.0 Introduction Every country has consumer protection laws that protect clients from harmful manufactured products.

Such laws have certain requirements in focus on product recalls, which have greatly increased in contemporary time. A product recall is defined as a process by which defective goods are retrieved from clients and thereafter, providing such customers with compensation (British Retail Consortium, 2003). Manufacturers usually carry out product recalls due to safety concerns over defects in manufactured products that may harm consumers.

Though recalls are expensive to a company, the effort is essential as it prevents damages and limits liability for corporate negligence that may cause expensive legal penalties (Robert, 2000). This report focuses on product recall IKEA.


Argenti, A., and Druckenmiller, B. 2004. Reputation and the Corporate Brand. Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp.368-374.

Rhee, M., and Haunschild, P. 2006. The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Organization Science, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp.101-117.

Souiden, N., and Pons, F. 2009. Product recall crisis management: the impact on manufacturer’s image, consumer loyalty and purchase intention. Journal of Products & Brand Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp.106-114.

Seib, P., and Fitzpatrick, K. 1995. Public Relations Ethics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace and Company.

Roberts, W., and Dowling, R. 2002. Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp.1077-1093

Australian competition and consumer commission. 2011, Product Safety Recalls Australia: IKEA—FÖRSTÅ coffee/tea maker, Retrieved May 19, 2011.

British Retail Consortium. 2003. Product Recall Guidelines: A Good Practice Guide for Product Recall. London: The Stationery Office.

James E.G., Larissa A.G., & Elizabeth L.T. 2007. The future of excellence in public relations and communication management: challenges for the next generation, New York: Routledge.

James S. O', 2007. The Business Communication Casebook: A Notre Dame Collection (2nd ed), London: Cengage Learning.

Robert B. 2000. Product recall: an aid for management. London: Leatherhead Food Research Association.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us