The paper "Project Management - Ethical Analysis of Tesla’ s Self-Driving Vehicles’ Case" is a perfect example of a case study on management. It is factual that technology development is happening in a swift way with the latest advances prompting concerns, especially ethical concerns, over their use or misuse. The advent of driverless cars and the potential concerns about having road travel with less or no human control raises many ethical issues based on existing ethical principles or views like deontology, justice ethics, and virtue ethics among others (MIT Technology Review 2015).
The ethics behind the use of such technology can be open to debate as demonstrated in this assessment paper that focuses on the ethical analysis of Tesla’ s self-driving vehicles’ case study. Part A: Three Ethical Issues The situation as described in the article raises three ethical issues. The first ethical subject is if driverless cars have an ethical obligation to prevent bad crashes from happening without sacrificing anything important. The second ethical issue is the responsibility of the human driver in the driverless car that seeks to control its actions (Lin 2017).
The driver in the car has an ethical obligation to prevent accidents and overrule the decisions of the vehicle’ s system with the aim of causing the most minimal destruction and deaths. The third ethical issue that arises from the situation is if the driverless car manufacturers like Tesla should shift the full responsibility of accidents to either their AI driver or the human driver that gives instructions to the car’ s computer or seek to override the decisions by the system’ s software (Lin 2017). These three issues are ethical concerns demonstrated by different stakeholders in the article.
For instance, the authorities in different countries like the United States are concerned about the high road accident fatalities every year; some fueled by psychopathic human drivers or human errors during road travels among other issues.
Association for Computing Society, 1992. “ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct”
Accessed from https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct
Australian Computer Society, 1997. “Code of Ethics” Accessed from
Aynsley, B. (2015). “Ethics essential for ICT professionals” Accessed from
British Computer Society, 2017. “BCS Code of Conduct” Accessed from
Cline, A., 2017, July 16. “Three Types of Ethical Systems” Accessed from
Krumins, A., 2017, July 19. “Self-Driving Cars Pose Thorny Ethical Questions in AI”. Accessed
Lecture 2, Project Management and the Professional, PPT
Lin, P., 2103. “The Ethics of Autonomous Cars” Accessed from
Lin, P., 2017, April 5. “Here’s How Tesla Solves A Self-Driving Crash Dilemma”. Accessed
Lin, P., 2017b, April 3. “Robot Cars And Fake Ethical Dilemmas”. Accessed from
MIT Technology Review, 2015, October 22. “Why Self-Driving Cars Must Be Programmed to
Kill”. Accessed from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/542626/why-self-driving-cars-must-be-programmed-to-kill/
Simon, M., 2017, March 13. “To Make Us All Safer, Robocars Will Sometimes Have to Kill”.
Accessed from https://www.wired.com/2017/03/make-us-safer-robocars-will-sometimes-kill/