Essays on Reputational Crisis in Shell Australia Limited Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Reputational Crisis in Shell Australia Limited" is a good example of a business case study.   Reputational issues have faced a number of business entities across the globe which has negative effects on the company and the shareholders (Giles, 2015). One company that has been faced with a reputational crisis is Shell Australia Limited. Shell Australia Limited is a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell that has been in operation since 1901. Initially, the company dealt with the delivery of fuel and had storage and distribution terminals (Staas, 2011). Today, the company has expanded its operations to coal mining, oil exploration as well as petrochemicals.

Shell Australia has a Sydney Harbour which is a receiving and storage facility that distributes crude oil in Australia. Ships offload more than four million tonnes of oil and petroleum products that are distributed by underground pipelines (Murray, 2001). In 1999, residents living near the Sydney Harbour were astounded by a strong gassy smell that was caused by a spill of about 80,000 litres of oil. This led to a reputation crisis for Shell Australia Limited (Murray, 2001).

This paper will offer a brief description of the Sydney Harbour oil spillage and will describe the company’ s assessment of the crisis. In addition, the paper will detail out how Shell Australia responded to the oil spillage and the role of public relation theories in responding to a crisis incident. Lastly, the paper will describe the outcome of the company’ s response and will provide a list of recommendations for improved reputation planning and management. Description of the Reputational Issue In the evening of August 1999, an Italian oil tanker was transporting crude oil cargo at Shell’ s Sydney Harbour (Staas, 2011).

300 tonnes of oil was spilt accidentally into the Bay terminal at 6.25 p. m. on a Tuesday. The reason for the spill was unknown at that time. The spill overwhelmed the residents living near the harbour and threatened the company’ s reputation and business operation (Staas, 2011). The crisis could potentially ruin stakeholder relations and could influence the government to stop the shipping and transportation of Shell’ s crude oil in Sydney Harbour. The termination of the oil shipping would severely affect Shell’ s Clyde refinery as well as Gore Bay terminal that distributed almost fifty per cent of South Wale’ s fuel requirements (Australian Maritime Authority, 2000). Shells External Affairs team came up with a pre-planned crisis communication plan immediately after the crisis which exploited the strong stakeholder relationships that have been available for the past ten years (Australian Maritime Authority, 2000).

In addition, the company’ s key messages were reinstated in several mediums through the use of communication tools such as personal briefing, media campaign and letterbox drops to name a few (Australian Maritime Authority, 2000).

The campaign and key messages from Shell were successful as key local shareholders expressed their belief in Shells ability to solve the crisis and their integrity and competence. More importantly, after the reputational crisis involving oil spillage, Shell in collaboration with the government announced the commencement of the commercial shipping of crude oil in Sydney Harbour (Australian Maritime Authority, 2000). Key Stakeholders of Shell Australia A stakeholder is either a person or a group of people who are directly affected by the operations of the company (Giles, 2015). Stakeholders of Shell Australia include shareholders, customers, employees, and government and business partners.

They are significant to the company since they bring a very substantial impact on the performance of the company. Shell Australia often holds a forum involving all the stakeholders to explain the concerns of the society around Gore Bay (Giles, 2015). After the oil spillage in Sydney Harbour, the stakeholder held their usual forum and accepted the responsibility of the oil spillage and wanted to be more informed of the company’ s activities. Additional stakeholder relations were created after the spillage with the ministerial politicians and public servants to create a two-way communication channel (Murray, 2001).

When a problem emerges, the government require the need to be informed even before the community is hit in order to respond accurately and immediately.


Australian Maritime Safety Authority 2000, The Response to the Laura D’ Amato, Report of the Incident Analysis Team, p. 1-44.

Beilinson, J 2013, What Shell's Kulluk Oil Rig Accident Means for Arctic Drilling, Popular Mechanics. Hearst Communication, Inc. Retrieved 30th April 2016 from

Botan, C & Hazleton, V 2006, Public relations theory II, Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eyun., K & Ledingham, J 2015, Public relations as relationship management : a relational approach to the study and practice of public relations, New York, Routledge.

Giles, S 2015, The business ethics twin-track: combining controls and culture to minimise reputational risk, Chichester, West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons.

International Oil Spill Conference (IOSC) 2005, International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2005(1), i-3.

Kenny B 2002, The UN's Global Compact, Corporate Accountability and the Johannesburg Earth Summit, CorpWatch, Retrieved 30th April 2016 from

Kimrey, LT Christopher M. and C. Eric J. Doucette. 2014, Pollution Response in Post Disaster Recovery- Best Practices From Hurricane Sandy, International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, p. 1041-1049.

MacDonald, I 2010, Deepwater Disaster: How The Oil Spill Estimates Got It Wrong, Significance, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 149-154.

Meier, J 2011, The four stages of highly effective crisis management how to manage the media in the digital age, Boca Raton, FL., CRC Press.

Murray, R 2001, Go well - 100 years of Shell in Australia, Melbourne, Hargreen

Rayner, J 2003, Managing reputational risk: curbing threats, leveraging opportunities, Chichester Hoboken, N.J., Wiley.

Staas, P 2011, Shell’s Prelude FLNG Project: An Offshore Revolution? Investing Daily. Capitol Information Group, Inc. Retrieved 30th April 2016 from

Stuart, M 2014, Responsible leadership lessons from the front line of sustainability and ethics, Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing.

Tan, E 2005, Sustainable Development in Shell, Retrieved 30th April 2016 from

Treanor, J 2009, Royal Dutch Shell to compensate shareholders for reserves scandal. The Guardian. Retrieved 30th April 2016 from

Veritas, N 2000, Risk Assessment of Pollution from Oil and Chemical Spills in Australian Ports and Waters, Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Canberra.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us