The paper "Relevant Research Quality Issues - Saeidi" is an outstanding example of a business article. Article summary and critique are two ways in which the reader is able to write a review on a scientific journal. In both types of writing, the reader is normally asked to read and understand the article from the primary literature of the topic. In general, a well-written summary should briefly but accurately state the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article (Schmidt & Hunter, 2014). On the other hand, the critique should begin by briefly summarizing the article and analyzing and evaluating the research.
In essence, the relevance of a summary and critique of an article is that it helps the reader to not only learn, but also to synthesize information from different sources, thus providing a detailed understanding of the article in question. With respect to the importance of writing a summary and a critique of an article, this paper will focus on two key areas: describing the paradigm as well as the associated guiding assumptions that underpin the reported research in Saeidi, et al.
(2015) article and critically evaluating the article with respect to the convincing nature of the author’ s conclusions while putting into consideration the methodological approach that has been utilized to address the research questions or hypothesis. Article Summary In their findings, Saeidi, et al. (2015) establish that the link between organizational performance and CSR is a fully mediated relationship. Besides, the authors also establish that the positive effects of CSR on organizational performance comes as a result of the positive effect of CSR on customer satisfaction, reputation, as well as a competitive advantage.
The study’ s final findings establish that only competitive advantage and reputation mediate the relationship between organizational performance and CSR (Saeidi, et al. , 2015). Combined, the study findings propose a role for corporate social responsibility in secondarily promoting organizational performance through the enhancement of competitive advantage as well as reputation while improving the customer satisfaction levels. Paradigm Assumption: It is with no surprise that the significant paradigms assumptions raised in specific research are interdependent and inter-related.
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage publications.