The paper “ Leadership Style of Betty Kester Who Has Been Working at Fancy Footwear” is an intriguing option of a case study on the management. Betty Kester working at Fancy Footwear, a shoe business owned by her uncle, was identified as the most productive worker with unmatched attendance. For this reason, the company decided to groom her by sending her to pursue a Master of Business Administration so that she can occupy a top management position in the future. Afterward, Kester was appointed to head the company’ s largest division following the early retirement of Max Worthy.
She comprehended the drawbacks of being hurled swiftly to a position of leadership, and so, Kester was prepared to shun them through participative management. Her predecessor was an absentee autocrat who made decisions from above and rarely made contact with the workers. A number of groups were established by Kester with the intention of engaging the workers, and all the groups had two meetings every week with Kesmer taking part in one of the meetings. In this case, all groups were encouraged to set up goals in their particular focus area as well as create plans to realize those goals, but in the beginning, the group work was distressingly sluggish.
The employees were unwilling to change their traditional way of working claiming that they are good at making shoes and not taking part in issues of management. Besides most of them were heading toward retirement and had no desire to learning a new way of carrying out their work activities. As a management style, participatory leadership is utilized these days by numerous organizations and companies. Comprehending how it functions can enable the leader to function better within the work setting.
As evidenced by Kester, in a participatory leadership style, decisions are made through participation from employees and the leader. As mentioned by Mehrabi, Safaei, and Kazemi (2013), leaders must identify their reciprocal independence as well as positively influence their workers in order for them to be motivated to participate in responsibility and reaction. Imperatively, leaders may impact worker’ s overall performance through interaction between them and their followers.
Hameed, A., & Waheed, A. (2011). Employee Development and Its Affect on Employee Performance A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13), 224-229.
Jones, L., Watson, B., Hobman, E., Bordia, P., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (2008). Employee perceptions of organizational change: impact of hierarchical level. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(4), 294-316.
Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-96.
Mehrabi, D. J., Safaei, N., & Kazemi, D. (2013). Studying the Effect of Leader’s Participative Behaviors on Employee’s Effectiveness Perception and Performance (Kohdasht Municipality as Case Study). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(1), 140-152.
Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101.
Rad, A. M., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2006). A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 19(2), 11-28.
Salminen, S., Mäkikangas, A., & Feldt, T. (2014). Job Resources and Work Engagement: Optimism as Moderator Among Finnish Managers. Journal of European Psychology Students,, 5(1), 69-77.
Zaeh, M. F. (2013). Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2013) (pp. 1-480). Munich, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.