The paper “ Risk Assessment of Fire Outbreaks in Accommodation Centre” is a thoughtful example of the case study on management. Risk assessment involves the determination of the value of what may facilitate the occurrence of injury or harm to persons in a specified workplace or grouping place to evaluate whether enough measures have been put in place to alleviate the occurrence of the harm or whether more precautions are required to prevent the occurrence of an injury (Kemshall & Pritchard, 1996). Risk assessment ensures that nobody gets injured or ill. It is the requirement of the law for risk assessment to be undertaken in any workplace.
This ensures that ill health and accidents resulting from workplace poor conditions do not occur. Risk assessment involves five steps. The first step is the identification of the hazard. This involves the identification of anything at the workplace that has the potential of causing harm. During the identification process, one is expected to concentrate on hazards that are more significant which may cause pronounced harm (Kemshall & Pritchard, 1996). To be able to identify the hazards which are more significant, all those involved in the workplace should be consulted.
For instance in a school setting the students, teachers, the management and the support staff should be consulted in order to identify the cause of saying fire outbreaks in the school (Health and Safety Executive, 2010). The second step is the identification of the person(s) who are at risk of being harmed. This may include saying the school community (students, teachers, management, and support staff) or members of the public who may be involved in fire extinguishing in the school setting. The third step in risk assessment is an evaluation of the risks and the measures that are in place to prevent the occurrence of the risk (HM Fire Service Inspectorate, 2007).
It is important to consider the likelihood of each hazard causing harm. This helps in determining the necessity of additional risk reduction measures. During the risk assessment, some risks may still remain and hence its significance should be assessed and decided upon.
Cote, A. 2003. Organizing for Fire and Rescue Services. London: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Health and Safety Executive. 2010. Health & safety legislation. Available at http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/harvard.htm?harvard_id=63#63 [Accessed 3 June 2010]
HM Fire Service Inspectorate. 2007. Fire and Rescue Service manual: Vol. 2: Fire service operations, Incidents involving rescue from road vehicles, Volume 2. London: The Stationery Office.
House of Commons Defence Committee. 2009. Defence Contribution to UK National Security and Resilience. London: The Stationery Office.
Kemshall, H. & Pritchard, J. 1996. Good practice in risk assessment and risk management, Volume 1, 5th Ed. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service. 2010. Risk Management Plan 2008/11. Available at http://www.lancsfire.gov.uk/IRMP/rmp2008-11.asp [Accessed 3 June 2010]
Office of Public Sector Information (OPSi). 2010. Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004. Available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040021_en_1 [Accessed 3 June 2010]