The paper "The Classical Theory of Scientific Management" is a great example of management coursework. Whether organizations based on management principles will perform well or just apply other theories to get results (Inclusion of the classical and the contemporary theories with reference to the performance of businesses in Australia. Introduction The management of most organizations relies on the principles or the behaviors they put in place towards realizing their targets. Organizational behavior or the principles, in this case, refers to the aspects of the description, the understanding, prediction and also the controlling of those behaviors from the human beings within the context of the organization’ s environment (Wood & Wood, 2002).
In this regard, the management principles cover the areas such as the dynamism, the relationship between the individuals and their group participation. Besides, it an also includes the way the leadership takes place in the business, the operation of the organization itself and even how some changes take place in the organization or the business’ settings or guidelines. Hence, with the direction of the management principles with respect to the organization’ s behavior in the control of the organization, the instance, in this case, may fall in the classification of the organizational behavior management or the OBM in short.
Consequently, the scope of this paper will be in the evaluation of the management principles applicable in the organizations for them to realize good performance or even if such organizations just apply the existing classical or the contemporary theories to realize such results altogether. Australia will be the case study during the course of this report. The Classical Theory of Scientific Management Indeed, the principle of management or the organizational behavior started as far as 20th century despite some experts giving their suggestions that the instance primarily came after the U. S Civil War.
The issue of the organizational behavior came into existence after the period of the classical management theories through the incorporation of the school of thoughts. In this regard, the aspect continues to affect some changes with regards to the response witnessed in the present dynamic workforce in many business organizations in Australia. Around the year 1911, through Fredrick W. Taylor’ s book of the Principle of the Scientific Management, it, in this case, marked the first steps in establishing the truth in the issue of the scientific management studies with regard to the classical theory.
The primary goal here was to offer then the necessary motivation to the workforce team in most of the businesses or organizations, in particular, to realize more in terms of production output from the workers (Wood & Wood, 2002). During this time, Taylor emerged to be famous to several people especially the engineers who found his thoughts applicable in the aspect of the time and motion studies and concepts within the workplace environments.
For instance, the engineers primarily focused on the task concepts with the objective to show to the workers what could lead to their motivation so as to realize production with less effort especially at times they get the incentives to do such tasks. The classical theory of the concept of management dwells on the ideas that reiterate that in the event that the managers have in place at least one task in a day in prior as plans for the workers will automatically lead to the increase in the production process.
Added to this, Taylor came up with the differential piece-rate system that relies on the two differential rates of pay (Wood & Wood, 2002). The system looks simple in that workers who did below their level of output also got very low levels of pay while those who went passed theist level of standards in the business organization also got high levels of returns. Currently, the same principle is also that takes place in the Australian most of the business organizations where most of the managers apply the theory with a view of realizing high levels of output in their organizations.
Based on this classical theory approach, is evident enough that money is the main motivating factor to most workers with respect to their performance despite it being such unique of its own to some perspective (Rogers, 2005). At some later point, many people came to refer to the theory as theory X with a view to differentiate it from other theories tan also gave their versions on the issue of the motivation of the workers at the workplace environments.
However, the theory fails to factor in the behavior of human beings while working in groups. For instance, the classical managers may have the concept on the value of workers working in groups through such groupings either may come with them some consequences that may slow the workplace altogether.
Cord, R., & Goldman, H. (2003). Quality management training in Australia. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(2). doi:10.1108/mbe.2003.26707bab.002
Franz, H., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation. Heidelberg: Springer.
Lobo, S., Matawie, K., & Samaranayake, P. (2012). Assessment and improvement of quality management capabilities for manufacturing industries in Australia. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(1) , 103-121.doi:10.1080/14783363.2011.639561
Rahman, S. (2008). Quality management in logistics services: A comparison of practices between manufacturing companies and logistics firms in Australia. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(5), 535-550. doi:10.1080/14783360802018202
Rogers, T. (2005). Creating practical knowledge for managing interprofessional health care teams.
Wood, J., & Wood, M. (2002). F. W. Taylor. London [etc.]: Routledge.