Essays on Understanding and Philosophy of Management, Leadership, and Stewardship Essay

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Understanding and Philosophy of Management, Leadership, and Stewardship" is an outstanding example of an essay on management. Over the years the concept of managing, leading, and stewardship have been entirely foreign not until I realized its relevance in the professional scene. Initially, my perceptions of the idea were limited to the fact that I portrayed rebellious nature towards people who were offered any leadership roles. I believed that managers were people who had unique skills that could not be adopted by an ordinary person. The idea that managers were chosen because they were more knowledgeable by default and their skills were acquired once they were born limited my ability to try and grow the innate desire to become a manager.

The society played a relevant role in building my perception since it failed to create a platform for the locals to develop their abilities. I did not know the difference between managers and leaders as their roles were quite similar. Such perceptions built the epitome of a confused and unstructured concept of the issue. However, as I developed regarding knowledge and experience, I had the opportunity to reflect on the innate abilities of people and relate them to the levels of success that they display when exposed to different situations.

The array of challenges that organizations across different supply chains display dictates the number of theories and models that would yield desirable results. Each time I would think of a group or read publications as well as listen to the news, I would wonder why some businesses experienced failure or closure. The most common themes that were mentioned in the writings were the dismembering of the management and leadership because of the inability to ensure desirable stewardship.

I was able to make nebulous connections between the postulations that were made in news reports and the initial information that scholars delivered. Students also have their set of challenges when working with groups on different issues projects. Working with teams involves opening up to issues such as diversity, time management, task allocation, resource distribution, and theoretical as well as model-based approaches.  


Brockner, J., 2006. Why it’s so hard to be fair. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), pp.122-129.

Christensen, C.M., and Raynor, M.E., 2003. Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard business review, 81(9), pp.66-75.

Cunliffe, A.L., 2014. A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about management. Los Angeles: Sage.

Fleming, P., 2014. Review Article: When ‘life itselfgoes to work: Reviewing shifts in organizational life through the lens of biopower. Human Relations, 67(7), pp.875-901.

Follett, M.P., 2011. Business as an Integrative Unity1. Sociology of Organizations: Structures and Relationships, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.

Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C. and Parmar, B., 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3), pp.364-369.

Ghoshal, S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, 4(1), pp.75-91.

Hernandez, M., 2008. Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), pp.121-128.

Jaques, E., 1991. In praise of hierarchy. Grahame Thompson & ea (Eds.), Markets, Hierarchies & Networks: the Coordination of Social Life, pp.108-119.

Kellerman, B., 2012. The end of leadership. New York, NY: Harper Business.

Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R., 2007. Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), pp.371-394.

Padilla, A., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R.B., 2007. The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), pp.176-194.

Palazzo, G., Krings, F. and Hoffrage, U., 2012. Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), pp.323-338.

Roberts, J., 2001. Corporate governance and the ethics of Narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly, pp.109-127.

Steers, R.M., Nardon, L. & Sanchez-Runde, C.J. 2013, Management across cultures: developing global competencies (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107-149.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us