Unit Topic: Should We Have a Strong Central Government? United s government is footed on the nature of federalism, where power is segregated between the central government and the states. The national government laws apply to all residents within national boundaries while each of the states’ laws applies to individuals who live in those states alone. This system of government where power is allocated between a central authority and numerous regional governments is referred to as federalism. The allotment of power in the United States has been founded on sharing out between the national and state governments since the constitution was signed.
Just as it is preserved in the constitution, all power not particularly entrusted to the federal government ought to be apportioned to the states. This is because the state governments are more accustomed to their people’s daily needs more than ever applicable to diminutive and isolated places. Federalism promotes unique and innovative techniques of dealing with social, economic, and political predicaments as each state is unique in its own way. Also, adopting the sharing of power between the central government and states discourages unfair dominance of the majority brought about by having one central government possess plenty control.
Federalism sanctions the state governments to try out public policies to determine their accomplishment or failure before applying them elsewhere. Again, it grants its citizens with a substitute to petition to the central government especially their state governments fail to heed to them. When some standardized laws do not make sense in a number of regions, assorted laws can be adopted. Sadly, federalism can show the way to confusion and incongruous policies in several areas of the country.
Inequality that brings about unhealthy antagonism between states may also crop up. In some cases, a citizen may not even be on familiar terms with which of the official to contact. Yet again, one state may collect more support than the others leading to vices like corruption. The deportment of power flanked by the two levels of government has, quite a lot of times, generated intense controversies in America. This has happened when national interests have collided with states’ rights. The federal government powers have inflated since the U. S.
Civil War in general. Still, there have been several periods when the power of the central government has been limited (Holcombe, 2007). A strong central government like in France presents one and the same opportunities to each and every citizen. Having policy debate and service delivery done at one point keeps away variations and a bad decision made by the state government affecting just one state. Regrettably, when a government becomes too powerful and a bad decision is made then it distresses all Americans, which may possibly be bad for the whole country.
It takes control away from the people leaving them unaccountable and unable to play part in what happens to them. Such a government system would not make any sense in the United States because of its discrepancy in population. Having the central government control nearly all parts of public policy in the nation and reserving few powers to local governments is grim. With a weaker central government, the people have more and better say in laws that affect them directly.
Reference Holcombe Arthur (2007). State Government in the United States. NY: Read Books.