Essays on Specific Organizational Change with Successful Management Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Specific Organizational Change with Successful Management" is a perfect example of a Management Assignment. In contemporary society, the dynamic business environment calls for effective organizational change management in pursuit of stability and sustainability across locations. From this perspective, the way businesses manage change and how successful they are at it, depends largely on the nature of the business, the change itself, and the stakeholders or workforce in the process. The aspect also depends on how well organizations and their HR or employees understand the need for change, as well as the relevant processes involved.

Evidently, implementation of change management activities proves to be instrumental in the realization of the goals for the planned, as well as unplanned changes in the internal and external environment. Effective change management is ideal in enabling organizations to diagnose issues regarding transition before they become a crisis. Categorically, it is essential to understand the change management theories and perspectives for effectiveness and efficiency in the management of the change process across the organization. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the strategic management of change in the case of Nokia. Background: External and Internal Analysis of Nokia In the first instance, it is essential to highlight the fact that Nokia was able to experience adverse implications from the external factors because of the onset of the downfall of the company following the shift of the behavior of the consumers by the market.

Categorically, integration of the smartphones was critical in affecting the position and reputation of Nokia as one of the practitioners in the market. For instance, the development and release of the iPhone by Apple was a critical factor in the onset of the downfall of Nokia.

It is essential to note the inability or incapability of Nokia to match the position of the market upon construction by Apple following the influence of the new products in influencing the behavior and concerns of the consumers (Scholten and Fynes, 2017). These products were essential in decreasing the preferences of Nokia’ s products across the world. The external factors did also include the quick launch of other phones, which sought to assure the development of application software in the mobile and phones.

The smartphones were the major external factors, which led to the reduction of the number of the consumers seeking to exploit or utilize Nokia’ s products, thus, enormous implications on the profit levels in areas such as Germany, Indonesia, and Russia. Nokia also had to deal with critical competition from diverse new entrants such as iOS and Android, thus, difficulties in the maximization of the market products at their disposal (Laamanen, Lamberg, and Vaara, 2016). Internally, Nokia did experience certain challenges regarding the growing competition in the external environment.

During this difficult period, there was a great need for Nokia to exploit the best leaders within the organization to oversee the effective management of change. Nonetheless, the internal maintenance of the company did not have the desired accountability and leadership (Fullan, 2014). The integration of the smartphone demanded the implementation of an aligned plan directing the company is moving further in pursuit of the desired goals. Based on the above assessment, Nokia did desire a change to manage or improve its position and reputation in the highly competitive market.

Consequently, change management at Nokia was necessary because of the following reasons:


List of References

Burke, W.W., 2013, Organization change: Theory and practice, Sage Publications.

Burnes, B. and Cooke, B., 2013, Kurt Lewin's Field Theory: A Review and Re‐evaluation. International journal of management reviews, 15(4), pp.408-425.

Cummings, S., Bridgman, T. and Brown, K.G., 2015, Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management, human relations, p.0018726715577707.

Fullan, M., 2014, “Leading in a culture of change personal action guide and workbook,” John Wiley & Sons

Hao, J. and Rashad Yazdanifard, M., 2015, “How Effective Leadership can Facilitate Change in Organizations through Improvement and Innovation,” Global Journal of Management And Business Research, 15(9).

Hayes, J. 2014, The theory and practice of change management. Palgrave Macmillan.

Kotter, J.P., 2014, “Accelerate: building strategic agility for a faster-moving world,” Harvard Business Review Press.

Kritsonis, A. 2005, “Comparison of change theories,” International journal of scholarly academic intellectual diversity, 8(1), 1-7

Laamanen, T., Lamberg, J.A. and Vaara, E., 2016, “Explanations of success and failure in management learning: What can we learn from Nokia’s rise and fall? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1), pp.2-25

Pollack, J. and Pollack, R., 2015, “Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organisational change program: Presentation and practice,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), pp.51-66.

Scholten, K. and Fynes, B., 2017, Risk and uncertainty management for sustainable supply chains; In Sustainable Supply Chains (pp. 413-436), Springer International Publishing

Shirey, M.R., 2013, “Lewin’s theory of planned change as a strategic resource,” Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(2), pp.69-72

Worley, C.G. and Mohrman, S.A., 2014, Is change management obsolete? Organizational Dynamics, 43(3), pp.214-224

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us