Essays on Strategic Human Resource Management - Analyzing the Google Strategies Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper ' Strategic Human Resource Management - Analyzing Google Strategies" is a good example of a management case study. The following paper is an analysis of Google’ s strategic plan from the perspective of Human Resources. The field of strategic management became mainstream in the last two decades of the last century, with many concepts on the subject being outlined (Hofer & Schendel, 1978); (Snow, 1978); and (Porter, 1980). The focus on strategic management has seen many organisations integrating each department into its strategic management procedure. The Human Resource Management sector has also sought to integrate into the strategic management field resulting in the Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) concept.

These two interrelated fields have led to various researches to determine how best they can be utilised together according to Miles & Snow; (1984); Schuler & Jackson (1987); Wils & Dyer (1984). The consequence of a strategic plan that is well thought out developed and implemented is a competitive advantage in the market. The understanding and exploitation of this competitive advantage are critical to the success of the business. Analysis of Strategic Plan The mission statement for Google is stated simply thus: “ Organise the world’ s information and make it universally accessible and useful” (Google, 2005b).

Although they do not outline a vision on the Google website, they do outline a set of philosophies to go with the mission statement as being the following: The spotlight should be on the user, and everything else will fall into place. It pays to focus on your core competency and over-excel at it. It is better to have speed than be slow. On the World Wide Web, it is best to be democratic. It is not necessary to be at your desk to require a response. It is possible to make a living honestly and honourably. There is no end to the availability of information It’ s possible to be serious without wearing a suit. Great is not sufficiently first-rate. Pop-ups not allowed (Google, 2005c).

References

Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social

Relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.

Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM:

Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of

Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 38-48.

Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on

Disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one

Another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317-348.

Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary

Relationships. Behaviour Change, 21(2), 127-140.

References

Appleby, A. & Mavin, S. (2000). Innovation not imitation: Human Resource Strategy and the

Impact on World-Class Status, Total Quality Management, 11 (5), 554-561.

Dubin, R. (1976). Theory building in applied areas. In M. Dunnette (Ed.) Handbook of

Industrial and organizational psychology: 17-40. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally

Google. (2005a). Form 10-K. Retrieved April 7, 2011, from

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312505065298/d10k.htm

Google. (2005c). Google corporate information: Our philosophy. Retrieved April 7th 2011,

From http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/tenthings.html

Google. (2005d). Google corporate information: Technology. Retrieved

April 7, 2011, from http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.html

Google. (2005e). Google investor relations. Retrieved April 7, 2011, from

http://investor.google.com/

Google Inc. 2011. Life at Google. Retrieved April 7, 2011 from

http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/lifeatgoogle/index.html

Hardy, Q. (2005). Google thinks small. Forbes, 176 (10), 198-202. Retrieved

April 7, 2011, from the University of Phoenix Library, EBSCOhost

Hofer, C., and Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN:

West Publishing

McMahan, G. C., Bell, M. P. & Virick, M. (1998). Strategic Human Resource Management:

Employee Involvement, Diversity, and International Issues, Human Resource Management Review, 8 (3): 193-214.

Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York:

McGraw-Hill

Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1984). Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational

Dynamics, Summer: 36-52.

Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing Industries and

Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Robinson, R. (2003). Ethical Considerations in Strategic Planning. Abaris Consulting Inc.

Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S.E. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource

management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1: 207-219.

Van Donk, D. & Esser, A. (1992). Strategic Human Resource Management: A Role of the

Human Resource Manager in the Process of Strategy Formation, Human Resource Management Review, 2 (4): 299-315.

Wils, T., & Dyer, L. (1984). Relating business strategy to human resource strategy: Some

preliminary evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.

Wright, P. M. & McMahan, G. C. (2001). ‘Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human

Resource Management,’ Journal of Management, 18 (2): 295-320.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us