Essays on The Main Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility in Oil Companies in Kazakhstan Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'The Main Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility in Oil Companies in Kazakhstana' perfect example of a Management Case Study. The development of a conceptual framework for corporate social responsibility also involves social issues as well as topic areas in which the responsibilities are tied. These issues keep on changing and they are diverse in different industries. This is why the social issues approach to assessing business and society relationships has to lead to managerial approaches that deal more with the development or specification of generalized modes of response to each and every social issue that turn out to be important to an industry (Visser 2010). The social issues have evolved under the rubric of social responsibility and hence this change should be acknowledged.

For instance, product safety, occupational safety, and health in addition to business ethics were not that significant. As much, preoccupation with the environment, consumerism, as well as discrimination during employment, was not very intense. The issues and in particular the level of organizational interest in the issues are always changing. As a result, as time changes, the social issues should also be tackled as per the changes (Samuel 2008). The concerns regarding social issues vary with different types of businesses.

For example, the environment is not a major social issue to a bank as compared to an oil industry whereby the environment is among the key social issues. Similarly, the oil industry is considerably more concerned with the issue of recycling when compared to an insurance company. There are various factors that the management should put into consideration when addressing the social issues within a given industry.

These factors include; Matching of the social need to corporate need or the capacity to assist. The gravity of social need. The interest of top executives Public relations significance of the social action The pressure from the government Therefore, social issues should be identified as an important element of corporate social performance, even though there is no specificity on the issues that should be addressed. Consequently, each industry should give priority to the issues that affect the organization the most. For instance, an oil industry must address the environment as a social issue (Parket & Gilbert). Philosophy of responsiveness Social responsibility within an organization should include philosophy or the strategy by which the business is going to respond to both social responsibility and social issues.

This element of responding to the issues is known as social responsiveness and can vary from ‘ no response” to a proactive response. This means that businesses have a social responsibility and the main focus should not be on the acceptance of the moral obligation but should be on the level and kind of managerial action taken in tackling the social issues (Subhabrata 2007). The oil industries’ climate change ethical dilemma Ethical dilemmas can be perceived as entailing a contradiction between socially detrimental procedure and the self-interested gainful results.

In the context of the oil industry in Kazakhstan, it is applicable as an ethical dilemma that comes forth between emitting greenhouse gases on one hand and making profits on the other hand. Concentrations of most of these greenhouse gases are a result of oil industry activities. This increases the danger of global warming of the earth's surface temperature and of notable sea level rises and climate fluctuations. Carbon dioxide is one of the greenhouse gases which comes from the burning of fossil fuels; , coal, oil, and gas are among the leading causes of climate change (Zinkin 2004).


Franziska, R., 2009, Corporate social responsibility in Europe: rhetoric and realities, Edward Elgar Publishing, New York.

European Commission, 2004, ABC of the main instruments of corporate social responsibility, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Toronto.

Samuel, O., 2008, Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, Walter Publishers, California.

Janez, P., 2006, Competitiveness, social responsibility and economic growth, Nova Publishers, New York.

Millin, C., 2009, Corporate social responsibility: a case study approach, Edward Elgar Publishing, New York.

Inter-American Development Bank, 2004, Corporate social responsibility in the promotion of social development: experiences from Asia and Latin America, Inter-American Development Bank, London.

Walter, L., 2009, Professionals ́ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, London.

Hazarika, A., 1998, Corporate social responsibility and the oil industry: global experience, McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. Ltd., Michigan.

Visser, W., 2010, The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Jill, S., 2006, Oil, profits, and peace: does business have a role in peacemaking?, US Institute of Peace Press, Austria.

Matthias, B., 2005, Corporate social responsibility failures in the oil industry, Baywood Pub., Michigan.

Kimberly, D., 2006, Organizational perception management, Routledge, New Jersey.

Michael, H., 2007, Corporate social responsibility and international development: is business the solution, Earthscan, Sydney.

Subhabrata, B., 2007, Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly, Elgar Publishing, New York.

Radu, M., 2008, The dynamics of corporate social responsibilities, Nijhoff Publishers, Martinus.

Skodvin, T., 2003, Climate change and the oil industry: common problem, varying strategies,

Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Pursell, G., 2004, Kazakhstan Petroleum Association, petroleum publishing house, Almaty.

Karl, T.l., 1997, The paradox of plenty: Oil Booms and petrol states, university of California, Berkeley, CA.

Wood, D. & Gray, B., 1991, Towards, a comprehensive Theory of Collaboration, Journal of applied behavioural science, Vol.2/26.

Parket, R., 7 Eilbirt, 1975, social responsibility: the underlying factors, Business horizons, Vol. 4/18.

Zinkin, J., 2004, Maximising the Licence to operate, Journal of corporate Citizenship, Vol.14/67-80.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us