The paper “ True Business Value of Knowledge Transfer Based Academic Collaboration between Russia and UK” is a breathtaking example of the research paper on business. The theme of knowledge transfer based partnership and its forms have been studied and presented along with its contribution to the Russian education system. The role of UK Universities and their academic collaboration with Russian Universities have been analyzed in-depth and the reasons along with benefits of knowledge transfer based partnership have been The theme of knowledge transfer based partnership and its forms have been studied and presented in the paper. This paper attempts to provide the fundamentals of academic collaboration between the UK and Russian Universities through the formation of joint ventures for supporting the educational system in Russia.
Universities are exclusively placed as they are specifically involved in all such processes because of their primary role in the areas of research and development, education, and training of individuals. This paper attempts to explain the significance of the best knowledge transfer based model for Russia and explore the strengths and the problems existing in it. There are different ways to carry out research like interviews, questionnaires, literature reviews, etc.
According to the author’ s point of view, the information found in books is authenticated and the literature in journals and on the internet is up to date so it was decided to complete this study with the help of questionnaires to students and literature-based work of authors, journals and books. In the end, the author proposed on the basis of comparative analysis of knowledge transfer based partnership in different companies and investment SWOT Analysis, the Hybrid model of teaching which can be helpful to working students and cost-effective for academic collaboration. Chapter-1 IntroductionForeign direct investment is the global movement of capital for particular investment purposes in the scenario when the foreign investor acquires authority and control over the specific investment asset.
It emerges when foreign companies are establishing or buying operations in some other country. Foreign direct investment encompasses innovative and new projects, activities of mergers and acquisitions, and expansions of current projects.
1. Anderson, E.W. 1998 Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulleting, 103(3), 411-423
2. Alm, J. 1999. The Education Policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 13, No. 3, 193-204.
3. Babakus, E. 1992 An Empirical Assessment of the SERVUAL Scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268
4. Bagozzi, R. 1994 Structural Equation Models in Marketing Research: Basic Principles. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
5. Bevan A, 2000. The determinates of foreign direct investment in transitional economies” Working paper No 342, London Business School
6. Biblarz, T. 1999. Family Structure, Educational Attainment and Socioeconomic Success: Rethinking the ‘Pathology of Matriarchy. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2, 321-65.
7. Boggess, S. 1998. Family Structure, Economic Status, and Educational Attainment. The
8. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 205-222.
9. Booth, A, 1994. Who benefits? Who does not? Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bound, J. 1999. Double Trouble: On the Value of Twins-Based Estimation of the Return to Schooling. Economics of Education Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 169-182.
11. Where has all the foreign direct investment gone in Russia ?H.Broadman,2003
12. Brenton, P. 1998. Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis of Foreign Investment in the EU and Central and Eastern Europe Kiel Working Paper No.890, Kiel Institute of World Economics
13. Carkovic, M. 2003. Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth?’ Working Paper (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota).
14. Carmines, E. 1991 Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures. Beverly Hills: Sage
15. Case, A. 1999. Household Resource Allocation in Education: American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, 234-238.
16. Caves 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (2nd Edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
17. Chamberlain, G, 2000 Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, No.1, 225-238
18. Cherlin, A. 2005 Going to Extremes: Education Structure, Demography, Vol. 36, No. 4, 421-428
19. Daly, M. 2004. The Truth about Education Partnerships. Yale University Press
20. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley-Interscience
21. Dunning J.H., Multinational Enterprises and The Global Economy
22. EBRD 1999. Transition Report 1999, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London National Education Policy of the Russian Federation
23. Economic Monitoring of the Education System. 2005. An information bulletin. Moscow. SU-HSE, FОМ
24. Eckstein, Z. 2005. Why Youths Drop Out of High School: The Impact of Preferences, Opportunities, and Abilities, Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 6, 1295-1339.
25. P. Fischer, Foreign Direct Investment in Russia
26. Gennetian, L, 2003. One or two systems in Education? The Effect of Education of Family on Young Children. MDRC.
27. Gennetian, L, 2003. Education in UK and Russia- a detailed study- Journal of Economic Affairs, pp, 33-34
28. Geronimus, A, 2002. The Socioeconomic Consequences of education for Teen. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 4, (November 1992), 1187-1214
29. Geronimus, A, 2003. The Socioeconomic Consequences of Academic Collaboration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 4, 1187-1214
30. Griliches, Z, 2004. Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginning of a Survey. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, No. 5 pt. 2.
31. Griliches, Z, 2001. Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginning of a Survey. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, No. 5 pt. 2. S37-S64
32. GIFO. 2006. An information bulletin of the conducted experiment. Ministry of Education RF, State University − Higher School of Economics
33. Hair, J.F. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
34. Halpin G. 1994. Effects of Number and Type of Response Choices of Internal Consistency Reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(3), 928-930
35. Haveman, R, 2005. The Determinants of Higher Education: A Review of Methods and Findings. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIII, No. 4,
36. Heckman, J, 2002. Evaluation of Education and Training Programs in a General Equilibrium Setting.
37. Hrdy, S, 2005. Nature of Collaboration: A History of Russian Institution: New York, Pantheon Books.
38. Hrdy, S, 2003. Historical Background of educational institutions: New York, Pantheon Books.
39. Kline, R.b. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Guilford Press
40. Kuznetsov, A., Foreign Investment in Contemporary Russia
41. McLanahan, S, 2004. Growing Up within educational background : What Hurts, What Helps, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
42. Manski, C. 2005. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43. Manski, C, 200. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
44. McLanahan, S, 1994. Growing Up in educational Background: What Hurts, What Helps, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. Attracting foreign direct investment for Russia’s Modernization-Mehmet,2004
46. Miller C, 1992. Alternative Estimates of the Effect of Family Structure during Adolescence on High School Graduation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 87 No. 417, 25-37.
47. Neal, D, 2000. The Economics of Family Structure,” mimeo, University of Wisconsin-Madison
48. Neal, D, 1999. The Economics of Family Structure, mimeo, University of Wisconsin- Madison.
49. Paulhus, D.L 1991. Measurement and Control of Response Bias. Toronto: Academic Press
50. Radelet, S. 1999. Manufactured Exports, Export Platforms, and Economic Growth. Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, MA. Unpublished.
51. Steenkamp, J. 1991. The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299
52. World Bank 2000. Improving Russia’s Policy on Foreign Direct Investment. Policy Research paper [Available from]: http://184.108.40.206/files/esw_files/improve_invest_foreign_eng.pdf
53. ZSUZSA LUDVIG: Attraction Versus Repulsion, 2003/1 (51-62)
56. EOCD Policy 2006
58. www.vanecc.com/rsx/economic & financial indicator(accessed on 12/05/07)
59. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/gov(accessed on 15/05/07)
60. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publicatios/factbook/geos/rs.html(accessed on 15/05/07)
61. http://www.ebcru//publications/doc/economypolicy (accessed on 12/05/07)
62. Dunning J.H., Multinational Enterprises and The Global Economy
64. Intermediaries in knowledge transfer& exchange-www.wmin.ac.uk/buildenv/maxlock(accessed on 04/07/07)
65. http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/9185-6.cfm(accessed on 05/07/07)
66. Knowledge transfer partnership-http://www.ktponlineorg.uk(access on 05/07/07)
67. FDI& Enterprise performance in transition economies-ESRCcentreUnivesitycambridge
70. Cherlin, A. 2005 Going to Extremes: Education Structure, Demography, Vol. 36, No. 4, 421-428
71. Daly, M. 2004. The Truth about Education Partnerships. Yale University Press..
72. Eckstein, Z. 2005. Why Youths Drop Out of High School: The Impact of Preferences, Opportunities, and Abilities, Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 6, 1295-1339.
73. Fan, Y. 2007 The Transfer of Western Management to China: Context, Content and Constraints, Management Learning, 29:2, 201-221,
74. Griliches, Z, 2004. Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginning of a Survey. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, No. 5 pt. 2.
75. GIFO. 2006. An information bulletin of the conducted experiment. Ministry of Education RF, State University − Higher School of Economics
76. Harman, C. 2003. Doing the Right Thing in a Knowledge Transfer. Knowledge Management Review Vol 6 Issue 1 pp 28-31. Melcrum Publishing
77. Haveman, R, 2005. The Determinants of Higher Education: A Review of Methods and Findings. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIII, No. 4
78. Hrdy, S, 2005. Nature of Collaboration: A History of Russian Institution: New York, Pantheon Books.
79. Kane, A. A., 2005 Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes 96(1): 56-71.v
80. Leonard, D 2005 Deep Smarts. How to cultivate and transfer enduring business wisdom. HBSP
81. McLanahan, S, 2004. Growing Up within educational background : What Hurts, What Helps, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
82. Manski, C. 2005. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences, Cambridge : Harvard
83. University Press.
84. Trautman. S. 2006. Teach What You Know: A Practical Leader’s Guide to Knowledge Transfer. Addison Wesley.
85. Thomas H. 2007. Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know. Boston Massachusettes, Harvard Business School Press