The paper 'Dependent Leadership Cultures and Practices' is a perfect example of a Management Case Study. In accordance with experts, leadership is usually acknowledged as a representation of authorities, like inducing fulfillment, implementation of sway or influence, and as a mechanism to accomplish individual or communal aspirations. (Nye, 2008) In an organization, leadership is one of the most crucial pillars that escorts towards the attainment of goals. Successful leadership in an organization is necessary to motivate staff to follow the preset vision and guidelines to attain an objective. (Nye, 2008) Several types of research have indicated that leadership is usually divided into dual categories that are staff oriented and task-oriented, respectively.
The staff oriented approach of leadership exhibits common dependence and respect for subordinates' welfare and requirements, on the other hand, the task-oriented approach emphasizes on achieving goals by making chosen employees accountable for precise tasks and by implementing strategies to maximize on-job performance. (Schein, 2004) Staff oriented leadership leads to better job satisfaction and inferior turnover rates amid workers whereas, the task-oriented approach of leadership consequences in elevated on-job performances and turnover rates.
(Nye, 2008) Though, both approaches of leadership are functional in the opposite areas within the framework of an organization, some researches conducted in concerned fields reveals that both approaches are interdependent. This paper hereby highlights the diversified cultures of leadership, types of leadership theories, and the significance of various leadership theories in an organization. Diversified Leadership Cultures Dependent leadership cultures and practices This category of leadership culture is generally exemplified by the postulation that merely people in designations of authority are appropriate for leadership. Overall, dependent cultures are acknowledged as “ conformer” culture.
(Gill, 2006) Additional characteristics allied with dependent leadership cultures are the following: Deliberation of decision-making power in only some superior designations, Superiority and position levels as an imperative basis of status, A conventional approach towards change, A prominence on maintaining a smooth flow of functions, and The propensity to smooth over errors openly. (Gill, 2006) Independent leadership cultures and practices This type of leadership culture and practices are usually typified by the “ achiever” theory that leadership materializes as required from an assortment of individuals based on acquaintance and proficiency. (Gill, 2006) This theory leads to decentralized judgment making, elevated demand for individual accountability, sturdy dependence on specialists and their knowledge, and competition among experts. The additional characteristics allied with independent cultures comprise: Individual recital as an imperative source of accomplishment and rank, Prominence on intriguing calculated risks, open disparities, and (Gill, 2006) Self-governing actions within workgroups. Interdependent leadership cultures and practices Interdependent leadership cultures & practices are a theory that emphasizes that leadership is a cooperative activity that necessitates shared inquisition, analysis, and wisdom.
(Hughes, 2000) This theory, on implementation, further leads to extensive usage of discussion, alliance, parallel networks, assessment of differences, and a center of attention on knowledge.
Overall interdependent cultures possibly might be illustrated as “ collaborative” cultures. (Hughes, 2000) Additional characteristics coupled with interdependent leadership culture comprise: The capability to function successfully across organizational restrictions, (Hughes, 2000) Directness and honesty, Versatile values of accomplishment, and Synergies being required across the entire venture (Hughes, 2000) Types of Leadership Theories There subsist a number of theories that have been propounded to enlighten the framework of leadership. These theories have endeavored towards defining leadership in assorted ways and have strived to recognize the features and qualities of a triumphant leader.
Gill, R. (2006). Theory and practice of leadership. SAGE.
Hughes. (2000). Leadership. Tata McGraw-Hill.
Klimoski, R. J. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: understanding the performance imperatives confronting today's leaders. John Wiley and Sons.
Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership: towards a theory of organizational functioning. Emerald Group Publishing.
Northouse, P. G. (2006). Leadership: theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
Nye, J. S. (2008). The powers to lead. Oxford University Press US.
Rollinson, D. (2005). Organisational behaviour and analysis: an integrated approach. Prentice Hall Financial Times.
Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. John Wiley and Sons.
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The nature of leadership. SAGE.
Thompson, G. (2007). The Leadership Experience: From Individual Success to Organization Significance. SELECT BOOKS.
Warren G. Bennis, R. J. (2002). Geeks & geezers: how era, values, and defining moments shape leaders. Harvard Business Press.