The paper “ Is Using Human Beings as Toyota Motors’ Human Resources inside a Balance Scorecard Ethical? ” is a fascinating example of the case study on human resources. Human beings play a crucial role in any organization despite the fact that they are not perfect and tend to make mistakes in their everyday activities. Since human beings are very important towards the successful operation of any organization, the key question which arises here is “ whether using Human Beings as Human Resources inside a Balanced Scorecard is Ethical or not ethical” ?.
In relation to the above-formulated hypothesis, this research study primarily aims at investigating the hypothesis with Toyota motors as the case study for the research. To clearly analyze the formulated hypothesis various resource materials will be analyzed in relation to the research. To come out with concrete conclusions and recommendation the study additionally will analyze why it’ s ethical to include human beings as human resources inside a balanced scorecard by making an analysis of the positive impact they create in the case of Toyota Motors as well as why this company considers it more appropriate to involve them in the entire process.
Furthermore, the research will analyze why is unethical to include human beings as resources inside a score balance by evaluating their negative impact in relation to Toyota Motors. A critical overview of Toyota motors company, as well as its employment strategies, will be analyzed primarily to give an insight on the role of human resources in any organization and why they are important The research will cover a broad analysis of facts and in which the researcher will finally make a conclusion after reviewing the results of the facts and studies done on this topic. IntroductionHuman beings play a crucial role in the organization as it is evident that the success of Toyota Motors is entirely dependent on its employees who actually perform the daily organizational activities.
It is quite evident that without employees then the organizational activities can never be performed adequately (Ferrell, John, & Linda, pp. 120-140, 2009).
Anthony, A., A, Robert, S., K & Mark, Y(2004).Management accounting, 4th
ed.Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp.123-145
Bryant, L., D.A. Jones & S.K. Widener (2004). Managing value creation within the
firm: An examination of multiple performance measures. Journal of
Management Accounting Research. 16:106-131.
Bosworth, D., L (2005).Determinants of enterprise performance. Publisher:
Manchester University Press,pp.10-20
Borowski, A (2010).Report on the Toyota Company. Publisher: GRIN Verlag,pp.34-45
Crawford, D. & T. Scaletta (2005). The balanced scorecard and corporate social
Responsibility: Aligning values for profit. CMA Management (October 2005):
David, M., L (2005).The Toyota Way Field book. Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Ferrell, O., C., John, F.,& Linda, F (2009). Business ethics: ethical decision making
and Cases,7th ed.Publisher: Cengage Learning, pp.120-140
Fuller, M., B & Beck ,J.,C (2006).Japan's business renaissance: how the world's
greatest economy revived, renewed, and reinvented
Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive
Performance. Harvard Business Review (Jan-Feb 1992): 71-79.
Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (2004a). Measuring the strategic readiness of
Intangible assets. Harvard Business Review (Feb 2004): 52-63
Linda, H (2009).Human resources and business strategy, 2nd ed.Publisher:
Butterworth- Heinemann, pagespp.100-157
Liker, J., K & Hoseus, M (2007).Toyota culture: the heart and soul of the Toyota
way. Publisher: McGraw Hill Professional,
Nan, C (2009).Sustainability Performance Evaluation System in Government.
United States: Harvard University, pp.100
Uwe, E (2007).Design and Implementation of a Human Capital Oriented
Balanced Scorecard in an Engineering Services Unit.Publisher:GRIN Verlag, pp.6-30
Paul, R., N (2008).Balanced scorecard step-by-step for government and nonprofit
agencies, 2nd ed.Publisher: John Wiley and Sons, pp.201-230.