The paper “ Why Managers Need to Be Aware of Limitations and Simplifications Present in Management Theories” is an intriguing example of the literature review on management. It was said that an organization will function effectively only if its personnel function not just as individuals but as members of an effective and efficient performing workgroup. The management uses its potentials in order to make the organization amenable to success (Miner 2002, p 361). However; one of the most vital activities in the organization is retaining and bringing improvement in the workforce (Sims 2002, p 80).
It is important that the abilities and the skills of the employees must have to be brought out in order to fully perform in their duties and obligations in the workplace. The more efficient the worker is the better the drive to success of the organization. The consumers who are in need of their services and products will be satisfied and hence it will be a plus factor for the organization's productivity. Service organizations have to adopt such kind of approach. If their services did not satisfy the needs of their consumers it will affect their quality of being competitive. With the ongoing and increasing global competition and changes, there is a need therefore for a management philosophy which is basically grounded on a moral contract which is basically what Ghosal asserted (Mullins 2005).
This moral contract pertains to the individual worker who needs to be considered as a resource of the organization. With this matter, quality management method and practice are seen to be as important as the workers involved in it. Several companies are in continuous search for means on how to alleviate their system of managing service organizations and their workforce.
They assume that one way of delivering better management is through the means of applying several theories. The implication of these theories may vary depending on the way they are approached and applied. AnalysisTheory and PracticeIndeed, there is no one theory that is comprehensive and sufficient enough for all situations (Mailick & Stumpf 1998, p 11). They tend to use the theory that seems to be the nearest one applicable to certain situations in order to come up with an expected outcome.
Carthy, Stuart (2001). From strategy to execution., financial management techniques and theory The Banker.
Cheng, T. C. Edwin. (2002). A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework.(US). Omega.
Gabriel, Yiannis (2002). Essal: On Paragrammatic Uses of Organizational Theory — A Provocation. Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp133-151
Mailick, Sidney &, Stumpf, Stephen A. (1998). Learning Theory in the Practice of Management Development: Evolution and Applications. Quorum Books: Westport, CT.
Miner John B. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses. Oxford University Press: New York.p5
Monin, Nanette (2004). Management Theory: A Critical Reading. Routledge: New York.pp1-10
Mullins, Laurie J. (2005). Management And Organisational Behaviour. Seventh Edition. Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England
Scholtes R. Peter (1998); Leader's Handbook: Making Things Happen, Getting Things Done, McGraw-Hill Professional, p298 retrieved from books.google.com/books?isbn=0070580286 on 5 December 2008
Sims, Ronald R. (2002). Managing Organizational Behavior. Quorum Books.: Westport, CT. p80
Weymes, Ed (2004). Management theory: Balancing Individual Freedom With Organizational Needs. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship p45
wildgreenyonder.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/m retrieved on December 5th 2008
Winston, Bruce E. (2005). Towards a deeper understanding of hope and leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies pp7-10