The paper “ The Woody 2000 Project- Lack of the Appropriate Planning and Resource Management Capabilities” is an affecting example of the case study on management. This project management plan is organized as a preliminary report and proposal for the Woody 2000 project. This widespread report, analysis, and recommendation is being developed as a suggested plan for business management and facility expansion plan and we will establish the proposed plan and enlarge its constituents as we exert through the numerous stages of construction management procedure. Our teams of managers will closely work with Woody 2000 administrative management team.
The aim of this report is to offer an assessment of the Woody 2000 project and entails an assessment of the present management methodologies and processes applied in the expansion of the company’ s production facilities. The project management plan looks at the appropriate procedures that should have been used as a base for the Woody 2000 project and also identifies the problems that came up during the implementation of this project. As a part of the assessment, we will start with an evaluation of the preconstruction process and compare the incidences that took place with the practices and standards of a well-executed project management plan.
In addition, the proposed plan will recognize the several procedures needed during the post-construction and construction stages. The current case study had several mistakes and problems connected with the whole process. The following proposed plan and report recognizes the techniques and processes that would eradicate the problems pointed out in the background of the Woody 2000 scheme. The proposed plan is grounded on the presumptions that were obtained from the data collected on the background of the Woody 2000 scheme.
The suggested project management plan is essential and will function as a direction for completing the project management manual for the Woody 2000 scheme. And this project manual will be used as a guideline for all stages of the construction project.
Esteban, A, 2000, How to get mature global virtual teams: a framework to improve team process, Journal of project management, 43(1): 26-49.
Elrod C, 2005, Utilizing multimedia case studies to teach the professional side of project management, Journal of stem education, 2, 10-15.
Badiru, A, 2000, Quantitive models for project planning, scheduling and control, Quorum books, New York.
Hughes, P, 2008, Project planning, Linux Journal, 75, 142-149.
Farmer, P, 2003, Paradigms are hard to change, Journal of planning, 76(3); 2-3.
Landis, J, 2006, Engaging the future, forecasts, scenarios, plans and project, Journal of planning and research, 27(3): 69.
Barret, K, & Greene, R, 2009, No time for budget busting, Journal of project planning, 22(8): 58-64.
Paulus, J, 2004, Time constrained project scheduling with adjacent resources, operations and computer research, 38(1): 38-40.
Warhoe, S, 2000, Schedule specifications; handle with care, Journal of cost engineering, 51(2): 3-5.
Reynolds, D, 2007, Basic concepts in the development of construction plans, Journal of project management and planning stage, 2(10): 5-8.
Bergman, R, 2009, Preemptive expediting to improve project due date performance, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(1): 120-128.
Ireland, W, 2006, Project management, McGraw, New York.
Dinsmore, P, 2005, The rights projects done right, John Wiley and sons, New York.