Essays on Consumer Perceptions of Ads on YouTube and Facebook Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Consumer Perceptions of Ads on YouTube and Facebook " is a perfect example of a marketing case study. The changing communication setting is well documented in the literature as are the results of effective communication with the ever short-lived audiences. The aspect of communication that is under much limelight is those that are driven by the social media phenomenon. The various user-centric multimedia applications such as YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and MySpace have been flourishing. Though the uptake figures of use of the above applications are well known, the impact of the applications on marketing is an area that is under-researched.

It is essential for literature to discuss the role that social media plays in communication in a bid to offer the best practice. It is essential for marketers to note that that the global online advertisement spend grew from about 6% to 10% and there are growing expectations in social media marketing spend from $716 million in the year 2009 to about $3.1 billion by the year 2014. Based on a research by Forrester Research (Martinez 2010), retailers amounting to 70% are making use of MySpace and Facebook, while another half makes use of Twitter to promote their brands to both the current and prospective consumers.

Internationally, consumers are integrating social media applications into their lives, with Facebook taking care of about 400 million people. Facebook also accounts for 7% of the American web traffic, and it is the most visited site (Dougherty, 2010). Internationally there are over 1 billion Facebook users. Twitter also accounts for over 200 million users. And it is among the most favourite sites today.

Despite the growth in both retail and consumer usage, very little is known when it comes to the use of social media as a communication tool in relation to its alleged value for consumers and businesses. Literature review on consumer perceptions Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Ads Although a lot of research exists when it comes to the aspect of online communication, not all kind of literature can be transferred to deal and explain the aspects of social media. For instance, the literature offers differing definitions of social media. This paper will adopt the definition presented by Kaplan and Haenlein 2009, who defines them as internet-based applications that play an essential role by helping the consumers to share insights, opinions, perspectives, and experiences.

References

Bampo, M, Ewing, M, Mather, D, Stewart, D & Wallace, M 2008, ‘The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance’, Information Systems Research vol. 19, pp. 273-290.

Cheong, H & Morrison, M 2008, ‘Consumers’ Reliance on Product Information and Recommendations Found in UGC’, Journal of Interactive Advertising vol. 8, pp. 38-49.

Chu, S 2011, ‘Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users’, Journal of Interactive Advertising vol. 12, pp. 30-43.

Cox, S 2010, Online Social Network Member Attitude Toward Online Advertising Formats, MA thesis, The Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester.

Di Pietro, L & Pantano, E 2012, ‘An Empirical Investigation of Social Network Influence on Consumer Purchasing Decision: The Case of Facebook.’ Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice vol. 14, pp. 18-29.

Dougherty, H 2010, Facebook reaches top U.S. ranking, Experian Hitwise, viewed 2 May 2015, .

Gangadharbatla, H 2008, ‘Facebook Me: Collective Self-Esteem, Need to Belong, and Internet Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the iGeneration’s Attitudes toward Social Networking Sites’, Journal of Interactive Advertising vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-28.

Georgi, D & Moritz, M 2012, ‘eCCIq: The quality of electronic customer-to-customer interaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

Golan, G & Zaidner, L 2008, ‘Creative Strategies in Viral Advertising: An Application of Taylor’s Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel’, Journal of Computer –Mediated Communications vol. 13, pp. 959-972.

Heinonen, K 2011, ‘Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers’ social media behavior’, Journal of Consumer Behavior vol. 10, pp. 356-364.

Kaplan, A & Haenlein, M 2010, ‘Users of the World Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media’, Business Horizons vol. 53, pp. 59-68.

Keller, K 2009, ‘Building strong brands in modern marketing communications Environment', Journal of Marketing Communications vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 139-155.

Kelly, L, Kerr, G & Drennan, J 2010, ‘Avoidance of Advertising in Social Networking Sites: The Teenage Perspective’, Journal of Interacting Advertising vol. 10, pp. 16-27.

Krishna, A 2012, ‘An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behaviour’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 22, Is. 3, pp. 332-351.

Madden, M & Zickuhr, K 2011, 65% of online adults use social networking sites, Pew Internet & American Life Project., viewed 2 May 2015 .

Mady, T 2011, ‘Sentiment toward marketing: Should we care about consumer alienation and readiness to use technology?’ Journal of Consumer Behavior vol.10, pp. 192-204.

Mangold, G &. Faulds, D 2009, ‘Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix’, Business Horizons Vol. 52, pp. 357-365.

Martinez, A 2010, Retailers jump on the social media bandwagon with Facebook, Twitter, The Seattle Times, viewed 2 May 2015, .

Reimann, M, Zaichkowsky, J, Neuhaus, C, Bender, T & Weber, B 2012, ‘Aesthetic package design: A behavioural, neural, and psychological investigation’, Journal of Consumer Psychology Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 431-441.

Sorescu, A, Frambach, R, Singh, J, Arvind, R & Bridges, C 2011, ‘Innovations in Retail Business Models.” Journal of Retailing, vol. 1: s3-s16.

Spence, C 2012, Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 37-54.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us