The paper "Tips That Scholars Should Adhere to While Writing to Various Audiences" is a great example of an essay on humanitarian. One of the basics of good writing is to mold your writing to suit the audience’s needs. It is important to consider the numbers of words in a sentence as long sentences are considered difficult and hard to understand. The same case applies to characters in words as long words can be difficult for the audience to comprehend (Kisting, 2011). The key thing is to figure out what one wants want to state and just say it. There are three types of audiences; the layperson, the managerial audience and the expert (Muraski, 2012). This paper will focus on the tips that scholars should adhere to while writing to various audiences.
Writing for Various Audiences
To write for various audiences, a person must find their scholarly voice. To begin with, the aim of the writer is to pass the message across and not to impress and bamboozle the reader with big words. Short words, especially verbs are appropriate to deliver the message (Rosenwasser & Stephen, 2009). It is important for a writer to carry out their homework well regarding the subject, and the type of audience. A layperson has no idea about the information and requires additional description while the managerial audience could possess some knowledge, but requires further understanding of the data.
The writer should rely on solid proof and not their own assertion (Muraski, 2012). For instance instead of saying, “Global carbon emission has increased drastically”, you could say, According to research conducted by UNEP (2010), Global Carbon emission has increased by 3%”. The use of grammar, spellings and writing style should be correct. Writing for the expert audience, for example, requires a completely different approach. The references should be up to date, and some specialized vocabulary. Academic, business or government publications require a formal writing style. Informal writing is acceptable in letters or emails to family and friends, web contents or popularity magazines (Kisting, 2011).
The ability to write perfectly doesn’t happen overnight; finding that scholarly voice is a learning process. A writer should learn from the audiences’ feedback as well as from revising their work. If an audience comments that there is still room for improvement, it means that more learning is required. It is advisable to ask for help from expert writers to develop these skills. It is also important to write something that is appealing to different audiences. This begins with the choice of a specific topic. This, in turn, will determine the type of proof that you will need to persuade the audience. Other appeals are those concerning the audience’s level of knowledge, from which the writer can start the article. The final appeal involves how the writers present himself, or herself as the persona in the paper (Rosenwasser & Stephen, 2009).
The writer should be careful in using first, second or third person in the paper. In the past, social scientists wrote using the third person as a sign of omniscience that resulted in ‘distancing’ and should not be overused. The overuse of the first person can also be annoying and may not carry much weight if the audience doesn’t care about a writer’s opinion. Instead, it is more effective if the statement was based on solid evidence. The use of first-person is allowed in writing styles, but the information should not be from personal opinions or feelings. Scholarly evidence and references should be provided since the audiences are different (Kisting, 2011).
In conclusion, the writers should clearly understand the aim of writing to various audiences. The key issue is to pass the message and make the audience understand it as it was intended. Success in writing for various audiences will be achieved when a writer understands the audience or the readers. This will assist the writer to know how much explanation to give and the writing style to use.