StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

User Models and Models of Human Performance - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
"User Models and Models of Human Performance" paper examines the role of misconceptions in domain knowledge development, the role of the domain in misconception-related problems, misconceptions in computer programming, and the consequences of this misconception…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
User Models and Models of Human Performance
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "User Models and Models of Human Performance"

User Models and Models of Human Performance "For what a man more likes to be true, he more readily believes." - Francis Bacon (quoted by Margulis (2005), cited in Stein, Larrabee, & Barman, 2008) 1. Introduction to Misconceptions Many errors made by novices learning a domain can be attributed to misconceptions. According to Fisher (1983), misconceptions are ideas that are at a variance with accepted views (as cited in Stein, Larrabee, & Barman, 2008). In common usage, this term refers to students ideas that differ from those accepted by experts in the field (Odom & Barrow, 1995, as cited in Stein, Larrabee, & Barman, 2008). Other labels associated with the term include "misunderstandings", "naïve understandings", "alternative frameworks", "alternative conceptions", and "personal models of reality" (Alexander, 1992; Stein, Larrabee, & Barman, 2008). Many studies have been conducted on misconceptions and their effects on learning in students. What role do they play in developing a students domain knowledge? 1.1 Role of misconceptions in domain knowledge development One of the most thoroughly researched aspects of misconceptions is their resilience - they are hard to eliminate (Champagne, Klopfer, & Anderson, 1980; Larkin, 1983; as cited in Alexander, 1992). One cannot just make them go away by giving new information to students. Alexander (1992) attributes this to the complex networks of related information associated with misconceptions. This connection of misconceptions to information associated with a domain could cause students to alter other concepts too (Duschl & Hamilton, 1992). As students do not know that these misconceptions exist, they often work towards reinforcing them (Alexander, 1992). For example, while solving a problem, a student with misconceptions in algebra would try to create an alternative process that would conform to the misconceptions. 1.2 Role of domain in misconception-related problems In well-structured domains such as mathematics, computer programming, physics, and physical sciences, misconceptions have been researched consistently (Alexander, 1992). While misconceptions are not limited to some domains, not much research exists on why studies focused on well-structured domains or how the impact of misconceptions changes with domains. According to Alexander (1992), misconceptions have a "dispersive quality" - the more central a misconception is in a domain, the greater its impact on domain knowledge. 2. Misconceptions in computer programming According to Johnson (1986), programs written by novices with misconceptions reflect the misconceptions through characteristic bugs. Novices in C programming often use "=" for equality testing, rather than the required "= =" (Bull, S. et al., 2008). A program to compare two numbers x=2 and y=4 with "=" for equality testing will yield "True" (Program 1). Program 1 #include main() { int x,y; scanf("The first number: ", &x); scanf("The second number: ", &y); if (x = y) printf("True"); else printf("False"); } In C language, "=" is used to assign values and "= =" to compare for equality. Students who are new to C are likely to use "=" to compare values, as they learnt in mathematics and other programming languages. 2.1 Consequences of this misconception While the statement "If (x = y)…else…" is syntactically correct, the value of "y" is copied to "x". This happens because of the "assignment by value" feature in C. No matter what the values of "x" and "y" are, the statement is always interpreted as true and the "else" part is ignored. In the above-mentioned program, the result printed is "True", irrespective of the values of "x" and "y". This misconception results in logical error. While compile-time errors like missing ";" and run time errors such as division by zero are caught easily, this category of errors are not easy to catch (Hubbard, 2000). The student would remain clueless as to what is wrong in the program unless someone with a better knowledge of C catches the bug and debugs the program. Also, students with this misconception may find it difficult to write a more complicated program such as calculating the factorial of a number or comparing ages. 2.2 User modelling systems to correct misconceptions According to Anderson (1990), tutoring systems using model-tracing technology follow the students cognitive states during problem solving in real time. Students problem solving is observed constantly and instructions are given on deviation from the solution path. Such a system checks not only the syntax, but also symbols used by the students (Anderson, 1990). 3. User Models Many tutoring systems are available to teach students. Tutoring systems that monitor students misconceptions help in improving students domain knowledge. Examples include: CMU LISP tutor. Students using the Carnegie-Mellon University LISP Intelligent Tutoring System (CMU LISP) learned programming faster and scored higher compared with their peers receiving traditional classroom instructions (Anderson et al., 1990, as cited in Merrill, 1992). This tutor uses the model tracing methodology, comparing students steps with those of a domain expert and giving continuous feedback. Students can diagnose and correct their errors using the feedback. The feedback is based on the solution, as well as prediction and analysis of the students potential problem solving plans (Anderson et al., 1985, as cited in Merrill, 1992). Systems using this methodology often have a database of different approaches to solve a problem, including errors and their causal misconceptions. The tutor analyzes students steps and compares with those in the database to predict plans. In diagnosis and feedback mode, the system verbalizes the misconceptions which cause the errors (Merrill, 1992). BUGGY. Brown and Burton (1978) developed the computer game BUGGY based on student error patterns in arithmetic (Polson, Richardson, & Soloway, 1988). In this game, students identify errors and misconceptions of "buggy" students, which are modelled by the computer. Students solve problems, checking continuously if their steps tally with those of the computer simulation. When there is a variance in steps, students can consider alternative steps in their procedure to simulate the errors. In doing so, they learn to debug others errors and to improve on their own concept knowledge (Polson, Richardson, & Soloway, 1988). Some user models do the teaching without modelling misconceptions: Lego Logo. Lego developed activity blocks controlled by a computer (Papert, 1986, as cited in Polson, Richardson, & Soloway, 1988). Children build racers with these kits and race them. This activity gives children an idea about speed, weight, and aerodynamics. Although this system doesnt teach concepts, students get to know the principles involved (Polson, Richardson, & Soloway, 1988). GIL. Although Graphical Instruction in LISP tutor has a model-tracing version to teach LISP programming to students, an exploration-based version is also available (Reiser, et al., 1991, as cited in Merrill, 1992). This version of the tutor does not provide feedback to students, who have to fend for themselves if they are stuck. According to Merrill (1992), students using this version of GIL took twice as long as those using the model-tracing version to complete their course, but were better at finding errors and debugging. Misconception modelling is of relevance in some adaptive systems, as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of relevance of misconceptions Misconceptions are relevant Misconceptions may not be relevant Tools built to test students domain knowledge. Tools built to train students in testing. Tools that teach the principles without focusing on concepts. Tools that teach students to explore on their own. 4. Model Human Performance The Adaptive Control of Thought - Rational (ACT-R) model of human performance divides knowledge into two types: knowledge of facts or declarative knowledge and knowledge of how to do cognitive tasks or procedural knowledge. In this model, chunks of information correspond to declarative knowledge. Procedural knowledge involves using these chunks to perform tasks (Anderson & Schunn, 2000). In Section 2, a misconception among novices of C language was mentioned: usage of "=" in comparison. Consider the Program 2 to compare "x" and "y". Program 2 #include main() { int x,y; scanf("The first number: ", &x); scanf("The second number: ", &y); if (x = = y) printf("True"); else printf("False"); } If x =2 and y = 4, result is "False". In ACT-R like model, one should define declarative facts and corresponding production rules. 4.1. Declarative Facts Our knowledge of the comparison is the fact. A chunk of knowledge "Fact2==4" is defined, as in Table 2. Table 2. Declarative facts Fact details Chunk definition "Fact2==4" chunk Is of the type "comparison fact", with slots "comparand1", "comparand2" , and "result" Fact2==4 ISA comparison fact comparand1 2 comparand2 4 result false 4.2 Production rules A production rule maps our knowledge of "Fact2==4" in a procedure to compare two numbers. We define a production rule for the comparison, "compare_x,y" in Table 3. Table 3. Procedure and production rules. Procedure Production Rule If the goal chunk is of the type "find truth" and state slot is "truth" of an "expression" Where "expression" has left hand operand as "=x", right hand operand as "=y", and comparison operator is "==", And "=equality" is a comparison fact with left hand operand as "comparand1", right hand operand as "comparand2" and result "result", Then change the goal to state "result". p compare_x,y =goal> ISA find truth state truth =expression> ISA expression lho =x rho = y op == =equality> ISA comparison fact comparand1 =lho comparand2 =rho result =result ==> =goal> state result 5. Predicting errors In the Program 1, a result of "True" when x=2 and y=4 indicates an error. While the program may seem to give the correct result for 2 equal numbers, the error is caught only in when "x" and "y" are unequal. So, catching of the error depends on values of "x" and "y" (Table 4). Table 4. Program errors x y Result Error 2 2 True Not caught 2 4 True x = y = 4 To model this error, we need a procedure "transform" that assigns the value of "y" to "x" instead of comparing "x" and "y" (Table 5). Table 5. Procedure transform If the goal is to transform an expression whose left hand operand is "=x", right hand operand is "=y" and operator is "==" And "rule" is a rule that sets left hand operand as "=lho", the right hand operand as "=rho", and new operator as "=new op", Then set "new expression" as an expression with left hand operand as "x", operator as "new op" and right hand operand as "=rho" And change the goal to retrieve left hand term as "x" and right hand term is "= rho". p transform =goal> ISA transformation =expression> ISA expression lho =x rho =y op == =rule> ISA rule lho =lho rho =rho new op =new op ==> =new expression> ISA expression lho =x op =new op rho =rho =goal> lht =x rht =rho Chunk encoding rule x=y rule ISA rule lho =x op == rho =y new-op = Chunk "x=y" is a rule with left hand operand "x", operator "==", "right hand operand "y" and new operator "=" 6. Errors and misconceptions In Section 2, Program 1 has no syntax errors, but gives the wrong answer when x = 2 and y = 4. However, Program 2 in section 4 gives the right answer when x = 2 and y = 4. How does the ACT-R like representation explain these changes? In the production rule "compare_x,y", the procedure checked for an expression with "x" as the left hand operand, "y" as the right hand operand and "= =" as the operator. When the expression "x= =y" was transformed to "x=y" in the production rule "transform", "x" was assigned the value of "y". The misconception which transforms the expression, results in a logical error. Table 6. Error classification Error Classification Reason if (x =y) Logical error Misconception in comparison operators gives erratic output. Conclusion An ACT-R like model was used to simulate the comparison operator misconception in C-language. References Alexander, P.A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist. 27(1) p. 51. Retrieved March 5, 2009 from www.questia.com. Anderson, J.R. (1990). Analysis of student performance with the LISP tutor. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M.G. Shafto, eds. Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved March 7, 2009 from http://www.questia.com/read/91976713. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science. 228, pp. 456-462. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A. T., & Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7-49. Anderson, J.R. & Schunn, C.D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets. Advances in instructional psychology, 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved March 5, 2009 from http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/Schunn/research/papers/NoMagicBullets.pdf. Brown J. S. & Burton R.R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science. 2 pp. 155-192. Bull, S., Mabbott, A., Gardner, P., Jackson, T., Lancaster, M.J., Quigley, S., & Childs, P.A. (2008). Supporting interaction preferences and recognition of misconceptions with independent open learner models. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems: 5th International Conference, Ah 2008, Hanover, Germany, July 29 - August 1, 2008, Proceedings. Berlin: Springer. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Z_8veELJ_PQC&pg=PA62 Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E., & Anderson, J.H. (1980). Factors affecting the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics. 48 pp. 1074-1079. Duschl, A., & Hamilton, R.J. (1992). Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. NY: SUNY Press. Fisher, K.M. (1983). Amino acids and translation: A misconception in biology. In H. Helm & J. D. Novak, chairs. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Hubbard, J.R. (2000). SCHAUMs OUTLINE of Theory and Problems of Programming with C++. New York: McGraw-Hill. Johnson, W.L. (1986). Intention-Based Diagnosis of Novice Programming Errors. CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Retrieved March 5, 2009 from http://books.google.co.in/books?id=dGdie63ZYOAC&pg=PA16 Larkin, J.H. (1983). Teaching problem solving in physics: The psychological laboratory in the practical classroom. In D.T. Tuma & F. Reif. eds. Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Margulis, L. (2005). Science, the rebel educator: I. American Scientist. 93(6), 482. Merrill, D.C. (1992). Effective Tutoring Techniques: a Comparison of Human Tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2. Retrieved March 6, 2009 from www.questia.com Odom, A.L. & Barrow, L.H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 32(1), 45-61. Papert, S. (1986). Rethinking mathematics learnability in a computer culture. The Karl de Leeuw Memorial Lecture, Stanford, 2 May, 1986. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J., & Soloway, E. (1988). Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved March 7, 2009, from http://www.questia.com/read/47609932? Reiser, B. J., Beekelaar, R., Tyle, A., & Merrill, D. C. (1991). GIL: Scaffolding learning to program with reasoning-congruent representations. In The International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of the 1991 conference. Evanston, IL: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Stein, M., Barman, C., & Larrabee, T. (2008). A study of common beliefs and misconceptions in physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 20(2). Retrieved March 6, 2009 from http://www.questia.com/read/5027566798 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(User Models and Models of Human Performance Assignment, n.d.)
User Models and Models of Human Performance Assignment. https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1552498-user-models-and-models-of-human-performance
(User Models and Models of Human Performance Assignment)
User Models and Models of Human Performance Assignment. https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1552498-user-models-and-models-of-human-performance.
“User Models and Models of Human Performance Assignment”. https://studentshare.org/information-technology/1552498-user-models-and-models-of-human-performance.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF User Models and Models of Human Performance

Theories and Models of IT business

Integration of various strands of research into a single framework makes it possible for the development of models of Information technology business based on the resources-based views.... This review looks at the relevant theories and models on IT business values, different views on Information Technology business value and effectiveness and efficiency of information systems to support decision making.... This discussion will look at the relevant theories and models on IT business values, different views on Information Technology business value and effectiveness and efficiency of information systems to support decision making....
7 Pages (1750 words) Literature review

Staffing Models and Strategy

Staffing models are crucial to any form of business because there is a direct link between staffing models and organizational strategy.... It is a known fact that overall productivity in any company is directly linked to individual efforts - an aspect that is adequately covered in good staffing models and staffing strategies.... (Michell, 1999)What staffing models and strategy entail Staffing models are a representation of the relationship between staffing costs and time utilization by employees....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

User Model and Modeling for Human Performance

The author of the term paper "User Model and Modeling for human performance" states that To err is human, but in many instances, such errors can be the direct result of misconceptions that prevent clear cognitive thinking about a problem or situation.... nbsp;… Madhu Mahadeva offers the view that misconceptions result in myths being presented as scientific facts and these could be due to (a) the inevitability of myths because conjecture and speculation is a legitimate aspect of the scientific method and (b) the propagation of such myths by educators and society at large(www....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Strategic Human Resource Management enhances organisational performance in both good and bad economic times

Strategic human resource management puts a lot of emphasis on the development of the firm's capacity to respond to the external environment through a better utilization of human resources.... Since, these company features directly determine the performance and success of the organization operations it is logically true that human resource management has a subsequent influence in the performance of the reference organization.... To achieve the perfect organizational performance human resource management requires good policies, adequate strategies, effective organizational culture, and good corporate environment to attain the requisite competitive advantage that guarantees organizational performance....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Abstract Human Resource Models and Application to an Organisation

The author of this paper "Abstract Human Resource models and Application to an Organisation" mentions that no two companies exhibit the same management procedure.... In light of this, it will make an analysis of two business models and then see how the contents are applicable to the chosen company.... These different management models are derived from the theoretical human resource (HR) models that tend to be applicable to the practical running of these companies (Kumar, 2010, p....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Shareholder and Stakeholder Models of Corporate Governance

In this study the above models of corporate governance are compared.... Moreover, it has been proved that the changes made on the shareholder model for making this model friendlier for employees have not been quite satisfactory: the shareholder model, despite its alternations, remains a framework that focuses on profits rather than on human relations within each organization.... At the same time, the level at which each of these models can secure a balance in regard to the objectives of the employment relationship is explained....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Five Factor Model of Personality

Therefore, the five-factor model of personality refers to five core areas derived from this report to represent human traits.... The aim of the paper “Five Factor Model of Personality” is to describe the development of scientific means of determining the traits that individuals are bound to express across multiple situations over the years....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Human Performance Technology

Moreover, managerial skills are essential in the application of human performance technology.... This pre-requisite outlines the outstanding necessity of human performance technology to make the process of objectives' achievement easier.... This paper ''human performance Technology'' tells that HPT refers to a systematic technique of enhancing competence and productivity.... hellip; Specifically, human performance technology comprises several aspects such as selection, analysis, design, enhancement, implementation, and evaluation of programs....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us