CDC Evaluation in China and Other Asian Countries - Essay Example

"CDC Evaluation in China and Other Asian Countries" is a good example of a paper on the health system. 
CDC endeavors to implement a program within selected nations that include Brazil, China, Thailand, Tanzania, and Jordan to alleviate the ill effects of various non-communicable diseases. Owing to their set objectives, it is critical to assess whether the program has achieved them, and look for ways of ascertaining that it meets them. As such, the evaluation process will look into the original and the continuing program activities, as look whether they aim at meeting the set goals.

Purpose of the Evaluation

The evaluation process determines to establish the program's effectiveness in the CDC’s ability to alleviate the adverse effects of the non-communicable diseases that include cardiovascular ailments, cancer, and diabetes (Mate et al., 2013). This will assess whether the project has lessened its prevalence in the scheduled times according to the program. In this stage of the project evaluation, it will be critical to improving the perceivably weak points of the project. It is also imperative to implement new knowledge that lacked in the initial stages of the project (Beane, Hobbs & Thirumurthy, 2013). In so doing, the evaluation process will pose the following questions: How and why is the program working as intended? Are there essential setbacks? A comprehensive response to these inquiries will be critical.

Evaluation Design

Owing to the nature of the program, it will advisable to employ the quantitative research method. In it, the assessment will look into the number of individuals that the program has influenced positively (Beane, Hobbs & Thirumurthy, 2013). This implies that it will look into the number of people that the program has reversed their conditions of non-communicable diseases against the targeted number. It will look into key issues as to why the program has not reached the targeted number of individuals (Mate et al., 2013). It may also be critical to perform qualitative research, where the program considers the change in the conditions of a given number of individuals who initially suffered non-communicable diseases. Such methods will include questionnaires, interviews, and observation in the collection of the data for analysis.

The Outcome Measures

Owing to the success of the program, the number of people suffering from chronic cardiovascular diseases ought to reduce by 50 percent (Mate et al., 2013). Additionally, the program targets to reduce the number of diabetes cases by 20 percent. Achievement of these targets will have rendered the program a success. It will also be significant to consider the number of individuals that the program has created awareness to, thereby becoming conversant with the disease, and having significant control of the disease.

Instruments Used

The nature of the program allows the use of specific tools in the evaluation process. For instance, it will be critical to use population samples within the nations touched by the project (Beane, Hobbs & Thirumurthy, 2013). This results from the fact that it may be impossible to assess the entire population affected by the program. The survey will also be useful in the evaluation of the program.  Other instruments of critical significance may be questionnaires, where the involved parties distribute questionnaires to a population for a response regarding the quality and impacts of the program (Mate et al., 2013). Patients encounter tracking tools will also be vital in assessing the outcomes of the survey.

Data Collection Procedures

Before embarking on the collection of data regarding the CDC program, it will be critical to prepare adequately for the process (Beane, Hobbs & Thirumurthy, 2013). This will aid significantly since it will avoid inaccuracy of the collected data, and will avoid redundancy and ambiguity of the data. As such, it will be critical to distribute specially and carefully designed questionnaires, aimed at evaluating the whole project (Beane, Hobbs & Thirumurthy, 2013). Additionally, the evaluation team ought to select a population that has a direct impact on the project, in an effort to improve the accuracy of the evaluation process. Once the questionnaires are distributed and received, interviews will also serve as a significant data collection mode.

Implementation Measures

It will be critical for the program to collect gender-specific information regarding the individuals living with the selected non-communicable diseases (Mate et al., 2013).  Additionally, the program ought to run within the legally agreed conditions, and will uphold the rights of the inhabitants of these countries. The program also ought to run within a set budget and time, and ought not to exceed budgetary limits, and the time allocated. Additionally, there ought to be a set coordination committee. The committee ought to be permanent, based on legal and administrative regulation (Mate et al., 2013). Systematic and periodic assessment of the program will also be critical, to ascertain that the program runs to meet its initial objectives and that it does not endeavor on non-planned goals.