Criminal Law Scenario Project - Essay Example

While waiting for medical assistance and backup, he spotted somebody with the descriptions given. Against his expectations, the person did not comply with his orders even if he was in full uniform. Instead, the perpetrator walked toward Officer Jones and pointed an object at him that looked like a gun. This action demonstrated a state of insecurity not only for the Officer but also for all that was around him. At that point, Officer Jones is justified to have shot the person for personal defense and the safety of other people.

Another reason that justified his action is that it was late in the night and he was in a high-crime area. The officer patrolling such an area is expected to be conscious of any criminal attacks; hence, any readiness to execute any defense action for his safety and that of the civilians is justified.

The perpetrator’s lack of compliance was a signal to Officer Jones that the person could have had a powerful object that gave him the confidence to contend with a police officer. It was modeled in the exact version of the Glock 26 handgun pistol, which made chances of ascertaining its ability to discharge any bullets slim for Officer Jones. It was therefore within his powers to perform the shooting as a way of ensuring that his life and that of the victim were safe even though the object he was holding was a toy gun.

Police officer Jones having been on the midnight shift in a high crime area at 2:00 AM faced a peculiar kind of a case. A civilian approached him complaining of being beaten and robbed a few minutes before. The descriptions given of the perpetrator included the color of the pants, the height of the person, and the object he was possessing. Out of such a small description, it is unprofessional that he went ahead and asked for medical practitioners and backup as he prepared to attack the person. This action shows that he was ready to injure somebody even if it involved an innocent person who fitted the description given. He was ready for a shootout that should be the last thing with a suspect of a crime.

Identifying a person by clothes and height is not one of the criminal investigation strategies. There is a high chance that different unrelated people can have the same color combination of clothes at the same time. So spotting the person by clothes is not justifiable which makes the officer liable to pay for the damage he caused to the victim.

Rating the area as a high crime area justifies the perpetrator's action when he was ordered to stop. In such an area, and specifically at such hours of the night, it is common for people to pretend that they are police officers yet their motives are to commit crimes. The person could have had the object as a tool for self-defense. Therefore, the perpetrator is justified to have expressed brevity by not complying with the orders given therefore making the officer liable for shooting the victim.

Shooting the victim on the left shoulder was one dangerous move that he did since it is close to the heart. Any injuries could have occurred in the heart meaning, the officer was out to kill not to defend him. He is liable for any damage caused to the victim in the name of self-defense for lack of correct measures of identifying fake and genuine guns. The action sets the city at a high chance of lawsuit.