StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

House of Lords Reforms - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "House of Lords Reforms" focuses on the critical, thorough, and multifaceted analysis of the memorandum on the reforms in the House of Lords. One of the most important agendas of this Government has been the reform of the House of Lords…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
House of Lords Reforms
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "House of Lords Reforms"

Memorandum Concerning the Merits and Dismerits of Proposed Changes to the House of Lords The United Kingdom Parliament I. Introduction: One of the most important agendas of this Government has been the reform of the House of Lords. Both the public and the parties that make up the government have called for changes to the powers and composition of the Second Chamber. This memorandum outlines these changes to the House of Lords and discusses their merits and dismerits. II Changes implemented by the Labour Party this term The Labour party manifesto of 2005 claimed that one of governments initiatives would be a further reform of the House of Lords. In particular, the Manifest stated, "we will remove the remaining hereditary peers and allow a free vote on the composition of the house" (P. 110). That same year the government took its first significant steps in reforming the House with the Constitutional Reform Act. This act mandated the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom to take over the existing role of the Law Lords, in addition to taking on a role in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. It also removed the powers of the Speaker of the House of Lords and Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales from the office of Lord Chancellor. III Changes currently proposed 1. The introduction of elected officials to the House 2. The reduction of the number of House members 3. The elimination of life membership 4. A time limit for the passage of bills through the House 5. The removal of the remaining Hereditary Peers 1.The introduction of elected officials into the House of Lords. This change has been the most contentious of those proposed. The number of elected representatives that should be allowed has been the subject of considerable debate. It was proposed that 120 members be elected by the public, 120 appointed by a statutory independent commission and the rest would be appointed by political parties in proportion to votes received by a party at the most recent general election. Despite the debate surrounding the number of members a larger issue is at stake. In the report put forward by Clarke, Cook, Tyler, Wright and Young (2005) they claim that it is not so much the number of elected members but rather the powers they will receive that is at issue (p. 8). They state, "Whilst there has been a great deal of support for the introduction of elected members, some in the political world have been concerned that this would make the second chamber more powerful, and therefore result in a challenge to the traditional primacy of the House of Commons" (p. 8). merits and dismerits: There is little doubt that the introduction of elected members to the House of Lords would allow for a greater degree of democratic representation than is seen today, particularly within the regions. Yet, it could cause an unfavorable change in the balance of power between the two houses if elected members do not take the spirit of the Salisbury Doctrine into consideration, something many doubt would happen. Roger and Walters (2004) state the Salisbury convention is perhaps more a code of behaviour for the Conservative Party when in opposition in the Lords than a convention of the House. Indeed it is a moot point whether, following the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999, the expulsion of the hereditary members and the ending of the overwhelming numerical advantage of the Conservative Party, the Salisbury convention as originally devised can have any continuing validity (p. 19)1. If the House of Commons and the Executive wish for there to be a check on the House of Lord's powers of bill prevention they must look to making such limitations. 2. The reduction of the number of House members Currently the House of Lords has over 700 members and is one of the largest parliamentary chambers in the world. Although, since members are appointed for life and often reach an age where they cannot sit in on House meetings as often, attendance is considerably lower than the total number of members. merits and dismerits: The clearest merit of reducing the number of members would be the cost efficiency. In addition, a smaller chamber may work more efficiently. Hon. Keenneth Clarke claims (2006), "If we are to have a Chamber that is in any case principally about review, scrutiny and deliberation-in many cases, the attempt to reach consensus-a smaller group of people is almost certainly desirable." 3. The elimination of life membership merits and dismerits: Life membership provides such benefits as independence from the party, greater freedom to work on reform without the hindrance of reelections taking up large portions of Member's time and the clear-cut benefits received from the accumulation of knowledge within the Chamber. Clark, Cook, Tyler, Wright and Young claim, "members of the House of Lords are able to take a longer term view on issues and can provide import and continuity when governments change" (p. 21). Despite the merits of life membership many of the same benefits listed above could be attained with long-term memberships. Long-term memberships would allow for the size of the House to shrink but not the sort of knowledge and insight that results from experience. 4. A shorter limit for the passage of bills through the House Currently bills can be delayed for up to a year and money bills can be delayed up to three months. The proposed limit would be 60 days that the Lords can delay legislation passed by the House of Commons. merits and dismerits: A time limit of two months would be keeping in line with Government's desire to limit but not cripple the House of Lords policy making filter. Hon. Keenneth Clarke states that, "At Present it plays a more important role in Parliament by raising some important points about the quality of legislation, about civil liberties and so on. There is an argument that it is the most effective part in Parliament in holding the executive to account in the interests of John citizen." 4. The removal of the remaining Hereditary Peers The House of Lords Act of 1999 resulted in the removal of all but 92 Peers. In 2005 the government on various occasions made clear that if there was to be a reform of the House of Lords the removal of the Hereditary Peers would most definitely be on the agenda. Merits and dismerits: These fall along much the same lines as those of lifetime membership. With the removal of the remaining hereditary peers knowledge and experience would be lost but a higher degree of democracy and a greater representation of the people would be gained. IV Conclusion: In 2004 the Labour Peers Group came together to consider what future reforms the House of Lords should face. On of the conclusions they came to was that, "A Second Chamber should complement the work of the elected House of Commons and concentrate on the scrutiny and revision of legislation" (qtd. in Kelly). Reform of the House of Lords in its composition and powers would result in the Chamber being a more democratic, affective, and representative body of government for the people of Great Britain . References Clarke, hon, K. (2006). House of Lords Debate. Westminsterhall Debates. 31 Jan: Reform to the House of Lords: House of Commons Kelly, R. (2006). House of Lords: Continuing Debate. House of Commons Library Standard note: SN/PC/3895, Last Updated 26 Jan 2006 Labour Party Manifesto, (2005) Britain Forward, Not Back Clarke, K., Cook, R., Tyler, P., Wright, T., Young, G., (2005). Reforming the House of Lords: Breaking the Deadlock. Constitution Unit: UCL Rogers, R., Walters, R., How Parliament Works, 5th edition, Longman Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“House of Lords Reform Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1504783-house-of-lords-reform
(House of Lords Reform Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/politics/1504783-house-of-lords-reform.
“House of Lords Reform Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1504783-house-of-lords-reform.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF House of Lords Reforms

The House of Lords' Functions

The paper "The house of lords' Functions" reminds the UKParliament is composed of two houses, the House of Commons and the house of lords.... The house of lords that we know today traces its origins back to the 11th century.... The representatives of shires and boroughs made up the House of Commons while the religious leaders, magnates, and feudal landowners made up the house of lords.... The membership of the house of lords is further divided into the Lords Spiritual and Lords Temporal....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Parliament Acts and Reforms to the House of Lords

This paper "The Parliament Acts and Reforms to the house of lords" analyses how the two Acts have contributed to the reduction of the Powers of the house of lords.... The two Acts are renowned for the eminent role they played in the ultimate reduction of the powers of the house of lords in various ways.... With reference to the Act of Parliament 1911, the UK parliament deprived the house of lords of its absolute power of veto on legislation....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The House of Lords

The house of lords is an organ of the British parliament.... One, the lower house, was composed of shire and borough representatives which was called the House of Commons: the other, made up of religious leaders (Lords Spiritual) and magnates (Lord Temporal), became known as the upper house, called the house of lords. ... THE house of lords IN PUBLIC LAW Yusuf Belgore The house of lords The house of lords is an organ of the British parliament....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Reform of the House of Lords

It is hoped that the foregoing proposal represents the best compromise and a sensible system in the house of lords reform.... The paper outlines some of the proposals with a set of principles underlying the process: the primacy of the house of Commons (the 'Commons'), complementarity, legitimacy, no dominant party, a non-party-political element, diverse representation, and continuity.... As the Royal Commission chaired by Lord Wakeham emphasized, "The house of Commons, as the principal political forum, should have the final say in respect of all major public policy issues" and "it would be wrong to restore the fully bicameral nature of the pre-1911 Parliament....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Options for Lords reform

As a result the house of lords, which started out almost on par with the House of Commons has seen its powers and privileges gradually being eroded with the last act being the removal of most of the hereditary peers in 1999. ... y this initiative there would be only a mere ninety-two hereditary Peers in the house of lords and that too by election from within the large number of old Hereditary Lords.... The house of lords would then be dominated by appointed Peers and the hereditary Peers a mere rump of their size in days gone by....
28 Pages (7000 words) Essay

Should the House of Lords be Abolished

The paper tells that the house of lords is a legacy of the Royalist system of government that has no place in a modern democracy.... Most British people, on this basis, oppose the house of lords as a political institution because of the power is given to royalty and hereditary legacy within the body itself.... As an Angus Reid poll in 2010 showed: 'In the online survey of a representative sample of 2,004 adults, three-in-ten respondents (30%) believe the UK does not need a house of lords and want all legislation to be reviewed and authorized by the House of Commons....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

The Discussions on House of Lords Reforms

The author of "The Discussions on House of Lords Reforms" paper argued that the House of Lord is 'outdated, outmoded, and in need of reform'.... The cause of this initiation of reforms was the then government's incapacity to enact major proposals for lack of majority in the house of lords.... The three major issues of the Parliament Act of 1949 were that the house of lords should be complementary to House of Commons, having no permanent majority for a political party, heredity, not a basic qualification to sit in the reformed second chamber and women being given the rights to become Lords of Parliament....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

House of Lords Reform

This essay analyzes that The Parliament Act of 1911 is cornerstone legislation in this context as the provisions within it had the potential to significantly alter the status quo with regard to the house of lords.... This essay will show how far reforms to the house of lords have materialized and what areas have remained stagnant in the century since the Act.... The Parliament Act of 1911 is cornerstone legislation in this context as the provisions within it had the potential to significantly alter the status quo with regard to the house of lords....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us