StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the paper “ARE SWEATSHOPS AN INHUMANE BUSINESS PRACTICE?” the author examines the subject of sweatshops and the treatment. Analyzing different theories he concluded that not all sweatshops are inhumane and there is more than one manner of correcting the problem…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice"

? The of sweatshops and the treatment of its employees have long caused heated debates to occur, specifically if the practice is inhumane (Newton, Englehardt, & Prichard, 2011). Arnold and Bowie (2003) has studied and written extensively about this issue and believe that the issue comes down to the issue of respect and offering dignity to the workers. Sollars and Englander (2007) refute this simple claim declaring the issue is more involved than a single issue of respect. Arnold and Bowie (2007) believe that the Kantian theory supports their claims while Sollars and Englander (2007) believe the Formula of Humanity is the principle to follow. Each pair has evidence to support their claim and refute the others, yet through their arguments, the essential fact appears in both sides. Arnold and Bowie (2007, p. 308) believe that multinational enterprises (MNE) has one core duty and that is to be responsible for the employees under the authority, both directly and indirectly at home and abroad to ensure they are treated with dignity. The expectation is that the MNE will comply with all local labor laws, abstain from coercive practices, ensure all minimum standards for health and safety, and pay a minimum living wage (Arnold & Bowie, 2007, p. 308). Additionally, the yes side expects to force MNE managers by a “categorical imperative in general, doctrine of respect for persons in particular” to guarantee respect and dignity to all employees home and abroad (Arnold & Bowie, 2007, p. 309). The belief they impose on MNE is that all individuals have exclusive obligations due to their distinctive situations (Arnold & Bowie, 2007). The bottom line is MNE are responsible and accountable for the conditions in which their employees work. Sollars and Englander (2007) state that they are sympathetic readers but the Kantian theory simply does not state that the MNE managers must pay their employees subsistence wage. Furthermore, even if one is compassionate to this ideal, the theory does not demand of it (Sollars & Englander, 2007, p. 317). Sollars and Englander (2007) begin their argument that one cannot impose their beliefs into a theory and claim it supports it as Arnold and Bowie had done in their opinion piece. The next concern is addressing the imperative that all managers must protect their employees from coercion. The no side claims that they believe coercion exists in these types of workplaces, but working overtime is not a form of intimidation disproving Arnold and Bowie’s claim that it is (Sollars & Englander, 2007, p. 317). For each claim Arnold and Bowie makes towards sweatshops being inhumane, Sollars and Englander present valid counterarguments for minimum health and safety standards and upholding local labor laws. The claim these men make comes down to the right of the individual companies to set their own standards based on their companies mission rather than forcing all companies to uphold an unattainable standard. 2. This issue receives a lot of debate for a reason; there is no clear answer as to the manner of removing the negative characteristics, which make the workplace a sweatshop. Sollars and Englander make that point often in their response, there are many complex issues involved in these workplaces. In fact, the argument of Arnold and Bowie appears naive at times with its basis on respect and dignity without considerations to all the factors that hinder the changes from occurring. There are many issues to address in setting wages in another country that require consideration and not all of them deal with trying to purposely pay too little for too much work. Placing respect as the main reason for setting higher wages is not something possible in all cases and placing an imperative order on all MNE to pay more out of respect fails to address these issues. The first and most important factor is the costs the consumers are willing to pay for the products from the sweatshops. Yes, there are companies such as NIKE where the costs the consumers pay, considered very high compared to another brand found in a local discount store. Customers are willing to pay for the name recognition. However, NIKE addressed this issue of sweatshops but not out of respect or a desire to give their workers in these sweatshops a sense of dignity. The public outcry was enough to force them to adjust their manner of doing business. This supports Sollars and Englander’s argument that Kantian theory alone will not change the business practices of MNE contract work to sweatshops and respecting their workers is something one cannot force on a company. The previous argument does not prove that contracting work to a sweatshop where the employees receive poor treatment is acceptable. The problem requires a fair assessment of the individual company to determine what caused the sweatshop environment to occur and the unique steps to resolve this issue rather than offering a blanket command that all business respect their employees regardless of their geographical location. Sollars and Englander point out most multinational enterprises do not own the sweatshops in other countries; they are sub-contractors for the MNE. Sub-contractors have a different authority structure than the MNE, who contracts the work. A company working with a local supplier of employee uniforms has no say on the working conditions of the uniform company, yet Arnold and Bowie believe the MNE can enter a sweatshop and demand the conditions or pay change. While they cannot demand change, they can encourage change with positive and negative consequences. However, this is not usually effective in changing the problem as anyone can present a good first impression while hiding the truth. 3. Both sides have valid concerns about this issue and yet neither party has a clear answer in how to change the problem of sweatshops. This writer believes that many sweatshops are inhumane in their treatment of their employees but it is not solely due to the lack of respect of the employees. In a number of third world or developing countries, the expectations are lower than in the industrialized and post-industrialized nations. The population is not to the point of demanding dramatic changes in the manner of doing business. For a number of these nations, the sweatshops and improved sweatshop conditions have increased the opportunities for many more of their people. China and India have seen an increase in the economy and China’s workers are now able to afford more products from the United States and other developed countries. Another area of concern is the corruption and lack of laws to protect the workers. A number of media accounts have detailed the lack of health and safety standards in third world countries and the MNE entering into business in these areas meet the poor standards. This indicates that the problems are far more involved than simply the MNE lacking respect, but the lack of infrastructure to support developed nations ideas in a developing nation’s countries substructure. This writer supports more of the arguments that Sollars and Englander present as to why the respect issue is not sufficient to address the problems. However, the writer does not support their side of the argument that the sweatshops are a humane manner of conducting business. The problem really comes down to placing an ‘all or nothing’ phrase on sweatshops and the manner to correct the problem in these workplaces. The essential fact that appears in both arguments is that not all sweatshops are inhumane and there is more than one manner of correcting the problem. References Arnold, D. G. & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and Respect for Persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2): 221-242. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2007). Respect for workers in global supply chains: Advancing the debate over sweatshops. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 135-145.  Newton, L., Englehardt, E., & Pritchard, M. (2011). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Business Ethics and Society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Sollars, G. G., & Englander, F. (2007). Sweatshops: Kant and consequences. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 115-133. . Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1465841-are-sweatshops-an-inhumane-business-practice
(Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice Essay)
https://studentshare.org/business/1465841-are-sweatshops-an-inhumane-business-practice.
“Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1465841-are-sweatshops-an-inhumane-business-practice.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Are Sweatshops an Inhumane Business Practice

The Sweatshop Business in India

The Hidden Truth behind Sweatshop business in India Name University The Hidden Truth behind Sweatshop business in India Today, the increasing trend of globalization has provided countless opportunities for third-world countries, while also leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by large corporations.... hellip; Globalization has also allowed big brands to function as a licensing business and to outsource their production and warehousing to lower-cost nations (Ross 2010)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Whether Global Business Players Should Carry Out Business in Nations Which Consistently Violate Human Rights

The author of the paper "Whether Global business Players Should Carry Out business in Nations Which Consistently Violate Human Rights" will begin with the statement that Latin America is one of the regions where sweatshops violation in the trade industry is widespread.... The behavioral traits exhibited by firms in the hosting nations normally impact negatively on the economies and persons of both the targeted nation as well as the host firms doing business....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

The Benefits of Sweatshops

Where in first world countries, child labor is considered inhumane; in third world countries the practice of child labor is vital for the economic sustenance of many households.... It induces in the reader's mind an imagery that includes women and children slaving away long hours in the workplace under adverse working conditions and environment … What strikes a stronger and more emotionally deep chord with the audience is how the blame for keeping sweatshops in operation falls completely on the shoulders of the average consumer....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Underpaid workers

hellip; Such working conditions, often, referred to as sweatshops; exist in the developing as well as the developed world.... Running sweatshops is a utilitarian act as it easily sacrifices the interests of the minority population of those working in them, for the interests of the majority population of manufacturers and the consumers....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Ethical Sourcing in Retail Industries and the Problem of Sweat Shop Labor

The term paper "Ethical Sourcing in Retail Industries and the Problem of Sweat Shop Labor" states that the fact that Free Trade and Fair Trade are not the same but can co-exist has been covered in the discourse.... The Multinationals have for long exploited the workers of the underdeveloped countries....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Business Ethic and Nike Company

It expanded to accommodate globalization while it contracted in the sense of removing geographical barriers as the evolution of communication framework connected the… These advancements particularly benefitted the way people conducted business and facilitated commerce.... However, in the midst of the seeming limitless capabilities of businesses in this information and communications era, the world economy faltered and headed Loveleena Rajeev (2009) supposed that “the lack of business ethics in the market, is the reason the world economy is presently in crisis”....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Sweatshop: Business Ethical Problem

sweatshops are also characterized by… The sweatshop issue which drew in Nike is also very well-documented.... Nearly every high-end apparel brand operates its sweatshops in various countries around the world, especially in places where labor costs are low.... This helps companies to save up on sweatshops are mainly concentrated around regions like South Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and so on.... Most employees of sweatshops are denied sufficient salaries and are, in most cases, bound to the messy quarters that are cramped with machines and other equipments....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Main Categories of Social Inequality

The following paper seeks to discuss social inequality in line with corporations and sweatshops as examples.... In society, many types of social issues show forms of social inequality around the world such as cultural tourism, people smuggling, global corporations, and sweatshops.... In light of these types of social inequalities, the following sections seek to discuss global companies and sweatshops to illustrate inequality issues in the world....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us