Essays on Challenges of the Adoption of CSR in Petrochemical Companies Research Proposal

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Challenges of the Adoption of CSR in Petrochemical Companies" is a good example of a finance and accounting research proposal.   Businesses are run with the main objectives of profit maximization, growth of sales, and survival. In order to achieve these objectives, companies had previously ignored their environment and focused on the factors that will help them achieve the main objectives (Caroll, 1999). Recent decades have however seen more and improved recognition of the environment surrounding businesses and better attempts to exist within these political, social, economic, environmental, and technological confines (Crane and Matten, 2016). CSR in petrochemical companies is mostly focused on environmental protection as the activities and operations that take place in the company usually exploit the environment.

Activities that affect the environment have gained massive interest as their impacts are more far-reaching than social and other impacts. Environmental effects are largely felt as they affect the whole global ecosystem. The majority of the developed countries are at the forefront of oil production as well as other activities related to petrochemical production. In the developing world, the gulf countries produced about 28% of the world’ s petroleum needs (Kubursi, 2015).

The trade of petroleum products forms the major economic activity in these countries thus contributing to major environmental degradation. Inasmuch as petrochemical companies in the developing world have attempted to integrate CSR and environmental reporting into their operations, the activities have evidence of lacking genuine motives for implementing CSR (Werther and Chandler, 2010). As such these petrochemical companies are accompanied by corrupt practices in the implementation of CSR and lack of commitment in the practice of environmental disclosure thus lacking commitments towards stakeholders. Literature Review The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) emerged in the 1950s and is seen as a practice that is relatively uncoordinated (Klonoski, 1991).

Various different definitions have been put across to suggest the meaning of corporate social responsibility. Several decades later the definitions of CSR are still variant and are based on the individuals and the responsibility that accompanies the practice (Turker, 2009). Earlier authors such as Milton Friedman (1970) defined CSR as a mere commitment to follow the regulations of the government and abide by rules related to society.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in developing countries has been on a surge in the current decade due to environmental awareness, industrial pressure, and a total effect of globalization (Matten et al, 2008). Adoption of CSR in petrochemical companies is accompanied by benefits and challenges, these are discussed in the following sections in more details: Benefits to practice CSR in Petrochemical Companies CSR is seen as a business opportunity with petrochemical industries producing clean fuel on the basis of demand by customers who are environmentally conscious. Stakeholder reaction to corporations that invest in CSR determines improved business or decreased business thus affecting investment (Govindarajan and Amilan, 2013; Cordeiro and Tewari, 2015).

Apart from corporate advantages, the long term benefits of CSR by organizations ensure that the future generation can still benefit from the current responsible business. Sun and Stuebs in 2013 suggested that companies with CSR as part of their business strategy have improved productivity in their operations. The pair analyzed the data of 170 American chemical companies, who already had strict government regulation, and found that companies who conduct active CSR reporting were more likely to have increased productivity.

The pair noted limitations to the study however, mainly being that the companies surveyed were already in good standing with the government and that one industry’ s result should not be generalized.

References

Adams, C. and Laing, Y. (2000), ‘‘How to research a company’’, Social

And Environmental Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 6-11.

Alara Resources Annual Report, 2014. Accessed from http://www.alararesources.com.au/irm/content/annualreport/2014/files/assets/basic-html/page19.html

Aldosari, A., & Atkins, J. (2015). A study of corporate social responsibility disclosure

practices in Saudi Arabia.

Al-Sheikh, H. and Erbas, S.N., 2016. The Oil Curse and Labor Markets. Understanding

and Avoiding the Oil Curse in Resource-rich Arab Economies, p.149.

AhamadNalband, N., & Al-Amri, M. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility:

Perception, practices and performance of listed companies of Kingdom of Saudi

Arabia. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(3), 284-

295.

Alotaibi, K. O., &Hussainey, K. (2016). Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and

quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International

Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 13(4), 364-393.

Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and

disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 476-

496.

Alsubaie, M. (2016). The Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility in Saudi

Arabia. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 16(4).

Aribi, Z. A., & Gao, S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: A comparison

between Islamic and conventional financial institutions. Journal of Financial

Reporting and Accounting, 8(2), 72-91.

Asif, M., &Muneer, T. (2007). Energy supply, its demand and security issues for

developed and emerging economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Reviews, 11(7), 1388-1413.

Carroll, A. B., &Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social

responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal

of management reviews, 12(1), 85-105.

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional

construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295.

Cordeiro, J.J. and Tewari, M., 2015. Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor

Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach. Journal of

Business Ethics, 130 (4), 833-849.

Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate

characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-

based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and society, 12(2), 111-122.

Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and

sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.

Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and

environmental accounting literature. Sustainability accounting and accountability,

248-272.

Eljayash, K.M., Kavanagh, M. and Kong, E., 2013. Environmental disclosure practices

in national petrochemical corporations and international petrochemical

corporations operating in Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries.

International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 2(1), pp.35-52.

Elsayed, M., Hoque, Z., 2010. Perceived International Environmental Factors and

Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Practices: An Empirical Study, The British

Accounting Review 42, 17-35.

Epstein, M. J., &Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in

managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic

impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Friedman, M., 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits the

New York Times Magazine 13 September, .

Govindarajan, V. and Amilan, S., 2013. A Study on Linkage between Corporate Social

Responsibility initiatives with Financial Performance: Analysis fromPetrochemical

Products Industry in India. Pacific Business Review International, 6 (5), 81-93.

Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D., Sinclair, D., 2001. Social and Environmental Disclosure

and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension, Journal of

Business Finance and Accounting 28 (3), 327-356.

Guenther, E., Hoppe, H., & Poser, C. (2007). Environmental Corporate Social

Responsibility of Firms in the Mining and Petrochemical Industries: Current

Status Quo of Reporting Following GRI Guidelines. Greener Management

International, (53).

Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy

theory. Accounting and business research, 19(76), 343-352.

Habbash, M. and Habbash, M., 2016. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social

Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Social Responsibility

Journal, 12 (4), 740-754.

Idemudia, U., 2014. Oil Multinational Companies as Money Makers and Peace Makers:

Lessons from Nigeria. In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability:

Emerging Trends in Developing Economies. Emerald Group Publishing Limited,

2014, pp. 191-213.

Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate

social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of

business ethics, 114(2), 207-223.

Kirat, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in the petrochemical industry in Qatar

perceptions and practices. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 438-446.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age

International.

Klonoski, R.J., 1991. Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social

Responsibility Debate. Business Horizons, 34 (4), 9-18.

Kubursi, A., 2015. Oil, Industrialization & Development in the Arab Gulf States (RLE

Economy of Middle East). Routledge.

Lines, M., Thorpe, B., Gadagbui, B. K., Haber, L. T., Dourson, M. L., Tickner, J., ... &

Shanley, M. (2005). Views on key issues facing the chemical industry.

Transforming Sustainability Strategy into Action: The Chemical Industry, 27-88.

Matten, D. and Moon, J., 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework

for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of

Management Review, 33 (2), 404-424.

Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N., &Zyglidopoulos, S. (1997). The evolution of corporate

social responsiveness an exploratory study of finnish and canadian forestry

companies. Business & Society, 36(3), 296-321.

Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (1999). Environmental crime: The criminal justice system's role

in protecting the environment. Sage Publications.

Sun, L. and Stuebs, M., 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity:

Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States. Journal of Business

Ethics, 118 (2), 251-263.

Tankeem Sustainability Advisor, 2010. The Evolution of CSR in Saudi Arabia: The

Changing Landscape, Saudi Arabia: Tankeem Sustainability Advisor.

Tran, N., Nonneman, W., &Jorissen, A. (2014). ―Government Ownership and Firm

Performance: The Case of Vietnam.‖ International Journal of Economics and

Financial Issues, 4 (3), 628-650.

Turker, D., 2009. Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development

Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (4), 411-427.

Wagner, T., Lutz, R., and Weitz, B. 2009. Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat

of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of

Marketing, 73( 6), pp. 77-91

Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility:

Stakeholders in a global environment. Sage publications.

Wright. D,. 2013. Market capitalization: the value of a company. Retrieved from:

http://en.tradimo.com/learn/stock-trading/market-cap/

Yu, M. (2013). "State Ownership and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from

Chinese Listed Companies." China Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 75-97.

Zubek, F., 2008. An Investigation into Human Resource Disclosure, phD, Liverpool

John Moores University

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us