Essays on War and International Statecraft Essay

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "War and International Statecraft" is a good example of a finance and accounting essay. International relations concern the diplomacy that goes on between nations in order to ensure that people in the different countries are well and secure. In the past, peace between nations, especially those that shared common interests in human or natural resources was hard to come by. As such, diplomatic relations and war were treated as fundamentals of utilitarian statecraft as evidenced by the persistent wars that prevailed in the past. The state of affairs in the current times is slightly or largely different.

In the twenty-first century, international diplomacy favours the use of mediation, adjudication, conciliation and the use of international law to preserve peace between nations as opposed to the use of war. In fact, war is so infamous that it is only used as a last resort when every other arbitration channel has failed. Yet, it is common knowledge that most of the powerful nations in the world spend millions of dollars in militant activities, arguably preparing themselves for any eventuality of war. One therefore wonders, are we really seeing the end of the war as a rule of good governance between nations, or is the world just sitting on a time bomb? This paper is based on an argument that we cannot completely rule out that countries will engage in war in the future.

However, it also seeks to prove that the critical causes of war in the past are on a decline as systems of governance the world over seem to have a firmer grip on international and national processes, unlike the past where governments had little control over such processes. A dark history According to Inayutullah (2003), war is the darkest blemish in the human race’ s history.

The past century (20th century) goes down in history as one of the bloodiest centuries in the world’ s history. Raising the question of whether we are seeing the end of the war even in the globalised society that the world is today may seem ridiculous to most political analysts. In fact, it may look as if suggesting that world wars are over is tantamount to saying that human beings are over being human.

Nature predisposes human beings to violence, greed, selfishness and self-centred habits (Inayutullah, 2003).

References

Bellamy, A. & Williams, P. (2009). The West Contemporary Peace Operations. Journal of Peace and Research, 46(1): 39-57.

Berman, P. (2001). Terror and Liberalism. The American Prospect, 2(18).

Brysk, A. (2004). Costa Rica’s Human Rights Foreign Policy. Retrieved October 31, 2009 from http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/members/congress-papers/lasa2004/files/BryskAlison_xCD.pdf.

Callahan, W. (2004). Remembering the Future –Utopia, Empire, and Harmony in the 21st century International Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 10 (4): 569-601.

Choedon, Y. (2005). China’s Stand on Un Peace Keeping Operations: Changing Priorities of Foreign Policy. China Report, 41 (1): 39-60.

Doran, C. (2003). Power Cycle Theory in Perspective. International Political Science Review, 24 (1): 13-45.

Echevarria, I. A. (2007). On the Clausewitz of the Cold War: Reconsidering the Primacy of policy on War. Armed Forces & Society, 34(1): 90-109.

Elshtain, J. (2001). Just War and Humanitarian Intervention. Grotius Lecture Series, 17(1): 21-30.

Franck, R. (2001). Book reviews: the Pursuit of Power, Technology, armed Force and Society since A.D. 1000; The Future of War: Power, technology and American World Dominance in the 21st Century: War, Economy and Society, 1939-1945; War and Economy in the Third Reich. Armed Forces and Society, 27 (3): 477-500.

Henrickson, A. (2002). Distance and Foreign Policy: A Political Geography Approach. International Political Science Review, 23 (4): 437-466.

Holliday, I. (2003). Ethics of Intervention: Just War Theory and the Challenge of the 21st Century. International Relations, 17(2): 115-133.

Hough, M. (1986). Natural Ethics and the Origins of War. Liberation alliance journal. Philosophical notes No. 6.

Inayatullah, S. (2007). Does War have a Future? Journal of Futures Studies, 8 (1): 11-114.

Koskenniemi, M. (2009). Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 15, 395-422

Lippman, T. (2008). Nuclear Weapons and the Saudi Strategy. The Middle East Policy Brief. No. 5, 3-4.

Liu, J., Paez, D., Slawuta, P., Cabecinhas, R., Techio, E., Kokdemir, D., Sen, R., Vincze, O., Muluk, H., Wang, F. & Zlobina, A. (2009). Representing World History in the 21st Century: The Impact of 9/11, the Iraq War and the Nation-State on Dynamics of Collective Remembering. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(4): 667-692.

Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Why we will soon miss the cold war. Atlantic Monthly Online. Retrieved October 31, 2009 from http://peace.concordia.ca/pdf/cold.war.pdf.

Mednicoff, D. (2006). Humane Wars? International Law, Just war Theory and Contemporary armed Humanitarian Intervention. Association for the study of Law, Culture and the Humanities. 375-398.

Pretorius, J. (2008). The Technological Culture of War. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 28: 299-303.

Pushkina, D. (2004). Towards Successful Peacekeeping: Remembering Croatia. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 39 (4):393-415.

Schaffer, M. (2007). A Model of the 21st Century Counterinsurgency Warfare. The Journal of Defense Modelling and Simulation: Applications, methodology, Technology, 4: 252-263.

Shaw, M. (2002). Risk Transfer Militarism, Small Massacres and the Historic Legitimacy of War. International relations, 16 (3): 343-359.

Taylor, C. (1999). Sacrifice as Terror: The Rwandan Genocide of 1994. New York: Berg Publishers.

Vieth, E. (2002). A Glamorous Untouchable Elsewhere. Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(1): 22-40.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us