The paper "Qualities of Effective Leaders" is a brilliant example of an essay on management. Managerial incompetence is very rampant in various organizations. Even though incompetence means different things to different persons, it generally denotes the inability to perform satisfactory work. Organizations are managed by managers with different leadership skills. That is why some organizations perform better than others. Nevertheless, it is expected that different leadership styles and vast managerial personalities bring reasonable output measured in employee performance. With all the discrepancies in leadership qualities, managers’ competence should not be compromised. This implies that their incompetence should be within a reasonable level that they should work jointly with as many employees as possible. Incompetence level up to 75% is therefore too high to warrant any good governance (Hughes, 2012).
Qualities of effective leaders
Inspiring—they could paint a future’s vision that motivates employees to do whatever it takes to reach there. During difficult times, especially during the financial crisis, they could clear the organizational roadblocks that derailed employees’ creativity and unleashing wonderful energy to press on.
Optimistic- they admired our work to uplift our living standards to clouds and discouraged any mischief. They encouraged us to perceive life from a positive angle and kept promising us of better tomorrow. Even when some workers were low in spirit, they could encourage them and spread the message of optimism.
Honest and just- they were fair in their duties and treated all workers equally. They could face issues the way they are. For instance, they could say this is possible and that is not.
Traits of ineffective leaders
Lazy- the manager reported to work very late and he could not solve an issue at stake. Procrastination was the order of his office. A lot of files awaited his attention all the time and he did not bother to check with his diary (Westby, 2003). To make matters worse, he could not make any commitments on the paper.
Poor communication- he could make follow-ups in his instructions. He gave orders and could not bother whether they were delivered or not. When you meet in the corridors, he could embarrass you openly, even with the slightest mistake that doesn’t warrant it.