StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation" focuses on the organizations which by their very nature are complex. Due to the increase in the scope and breadth of the role of the organizations, there has been a movement towards increased complexity.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation"

Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation INTRODUCTION Organizations by their very nature are complex. In recent years, due to the increase in the scope and breadth of the role of the organizations and the kind of functions they perform, there has been a movement towards increased complexity. Though the mind boggling nature of complexity has presented its own set of issues to be dealt with by the managers in these organizations, there has been no marked movement towards lessening the element of complex structures and frameworks by which the organizations carry out their activities. The main challenge that is being faced by managers is to ensure that complexity of systems, rules and procedures do not get out of hand and hence the persistent efforts to simplify procedures and reduce the complexity of the system. It has to be mentioned that complexity is an inherent property of any system and the study of adaptive systems has shown that complexity is an emergent property as well. Hence, this central tension between complexity and the human tendency to simplify or derive meaning by simple expositions lies at the heart of the debate over complexity. Hence, the paradox of simplifying complex systems is the theme of this paper. The paper attempts to answer the question: How can we form simple theories if organizations are so complex? This question carries with the implication that simple theories of organizations are difficult to achieve in the face of increasing complexity. This paper takes the position that though complexity is ever present and increasing, there can be ways in which the system (the organization in this case) can be described or theories can be made about the organization by adopting a two fold approach. These are treating the organization as an organic whole and forming theories about the whole. The second approach is by taking the constituent parts and then formulating theories about them. In no way does this author assert that simple theories about essentially complex systems can be made. On the other hand, the theme of this paper is that theories about the organization can be formed that can reflect some level of simplicity by following the approaches mentioned above. ANALYSIS As Macintosh and Maclean point out in their paper, there is a three stage process of organizations “conditioning” the outcome of the transformation process by articulating and reconfiguring the rules which underpin its deep structure; second, it takes steps to move from its current equilibrium and finally it moves into a period where positive and negative feedback loops become the focus of managerial attention. They argue that “by managing at the level of deep structure in social systems, organizations can gain some influence over self-organizing processes which are typically regarded as unpredictable in the social sciences” (Macintosh et al, 1999). The above passage makes it clear that a micro approach towards studying so-called unpredictable layers of the organization structure may well guide us in formulating a theory of organizations. Though the point here is not that this leads to simplicity but a nuanced approach towards organizational study that takes into account the multilayered complexity of organizations can indeed throw some light on the way in which theory formulation can be done. Further, there are some set of cultural attributes that contribute to how we understand complexity. For instance, the eastern view of cyclical processes and the nature of time lends itself to organizational study when it has been found that “The Chinese have historically preferred to absorb complexity by absorbing it (through dense interpersonal linkages within tightly bounded communities) instead of reducing it via codification and abstraction” (Anderson, 1999). The paper goes on to state how Westerners prefer to reduce complexity through rule systems and legal institutions. Taking the point forward, the authors argue that Western Multinationals operating in China have to make a crucial strategic choice: they can either try to cope with a complex environment by reducing complexity through standard operating procedures and policies or they can absorb it by building a relational network of allies. This captures the dilemma faced by researchers and managers when studying complex systems like organizations. Whether they should try and look for the organic whole and absorb the inherent complexity in the system or prescribe rules and procedures that compartmentalize the system and hence break it down into parts. It is the contention of this author that chaotic conditions that often are the defining characteristic of much of the developing world make the study of complex systems interesting and that managers from these countries are often better at managing complexity than the rule bound westerners who like to break down the problem into constituent parts. However, this is not to generalize the point as the Japanese have proved that they are very good at re-engineering. The inference from the above is that study of the whole is as important as studying the parts. Hence, the point that complex organizations do not lend themselves to simplicity should be re-examined in this light. To turn to the research of the managers and CEO’s who are “aware” of the present and the future when making decisions as well as “plugged in” to the interlinkages in the system, the authors Brown and Eisenhardt provide models where CEO’s who were making fast decisions retained a simultaneous awareness of the present and the future and attention to the present and future gives direction to change. The authors also cite the examples of managers who developed the core capabilities needed for understanding complexity by focusing on current projects and getting rid of their lock step and bureaucratic processes. They also increased the communication between tiers of production teams and added project level responsibilities (Brown, 1997). What these instances prove is that managers with cross functional expertise are often an asset to complex organizations and their value lies in recognizing the “hidden connections” between their domain and the other domains in the organizations. Hence, any manager who has the aptitude to realize the consequences of his or her actions on the whole organization and beyond the immediate project that they are handling can be said to be a “complexity aware” manager. CONCLUSION This paper has so far discussed instances of organizations that thrive because they are good at operating in silos as well as interdependent wholes. This very flexibility and adaptability of the organizations to function as self directed units as well as organic wholes are what give the study of complex organizations its meaning. As pointed in the above paragraph, the simple theories of organizations do not suffice when dealing with non-linear organizations that operate vertically as well as horizontally and move backwards and forwards in time. However, what the theories of organizations can very well do is to consider the web of connections that bind together the disparate parts and seek out the “hidden connections” between these parts that is an emergent property of complex adaptive systems. Only by knowledge of the constituent parts can we study the whole. To refine this further, only by knowledge of the constituent parts and by recognizing the tangled web of connections can we appreciate the richness of the complex web. Hence, the study of organizations cannot subscribe to simple theories if they lack these ingredients. In the same way, studies of the organization as a whole by means of grand theories do not suffice if they ignore the layers and the wrinkles in the organization. A comprehensive theory of organization would take into account both the interdependent and independent nature of complex systems to arrive at a theory for the same. Reference List Brown, S.L & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1998). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42: 1-34. Macintosh, R. & Maclean, D. (1999). Conditioned Emergence: A dissipative structures approach to transformation. Strategic Management Journal. 20: 297-316 McKelvey, B. (1999). Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organization Science. 10(3), 294-321 Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377 Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics. 22(2), 233-261 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation Assignment - 1”, n.d.)
Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation Assignment - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1727201-complexity-in-organizations-economics-and-adaptation
(Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation Assignment - 1)
Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation Assignment - 1. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1727201-complexity-in-organizations-economics-and-adaptation.
“Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation Assignment - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1727201-complexity-in-organizations-economics-and-adaptation.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Complexity in Organizations - Economics and Adaptation

Emerging risks from climate change

On the other hand, human behaviours related to climate change can be quite complex (Parry, 2007); a problem involving also in organizations.... On the other hand, human behaviours related to climate change can be quite complex (Parry, 2007); a problem involving also in organizations.... (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Proposal

The Impact of IFRS for SMEs on UK companies

Thus, organizations are faced with various considerations on what reporting framework to use in the first place to effectively contribute maximum benefits into their business.... In the UK, it is without question that organisations may eventually adopt it due to complexity of their business operations....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Sustainability as a Fundamental Factor in Cal Management

The adaptation based theory views sustainability as an adaptation route whose approach closely links system theories and complexity theories on self-maintenance.... These way organizations will play an important role towards a competitive and suitable society....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Competing Value Framework

The feasibility of the framework has been tested by various leading organizations and also by various business schools.... The Competing Value Framework (CVF) is one of the most widely used and important models in the areas of organizational culture.... The model is prepared after testing and matching the compatibility of the framework with that of the marketing activities and is convenient for practical uses....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Human Society and the Progress of Globalization

Commonly, strategic planning comes in contrast with prevalent cultural trend in a certain locality thus, this approach also require change and adaptation when it comes to its implementation.... When a company, which is aiming to distribute a certain type of product (for example, Dell mass produces computers....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Socio-Technical Design

My organization uses the strategies of defender organizations.... However the operating environment has turned out to be stable, which is one of the factors required by such organizations in order for them do perform well.... In the contemporary marketplace, it is important for manufacturing industries to ensure that they produce quality products that are acceptable in the highly competitive situation....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

James March and His Contributions to Business Management

However, understanding the process of decision-making in companies, organizations, society and individuals is considered as one of his major focus.... In this area, March has made an exploration of the factors that affect the processes of making decisions, including leadership, politics, orientation of risks, stakeholder's vested interests, challenges pertaining to delivering and heeding to advice and impediments to processes of exploring and exploiting the opportunities by the organizations....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Historical development of management

The non-owner managers became more and more popular as commercial organizations grew in size and complexity.... There are different views on the development of management as a field.... There are those who see it as a modern concept and those who belief that it is an ancient concept and practice that can be traced back to Sumerian traders and the Egyptians as they built their mighty pyramids....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us