Summarizing Analysis on Models of Health Care Implementation - Annotated Bibliography Example

Summarizing Articles on Models of Health Care Implementation Name Institution Summarizing Articles on Models of Health Care Implementation 1. Julie, M., Gawaine, P.D., & Mark, F.H. (2009). “Inter-organizational and Inter-professional Partnership Approaches to Achieve More Coordinated and Integrated Primary and Community Health Services: the Australian experience.” Australian Journal of Primary Health. 15, 262–269 Julie, Gawine and Mark et al. (2009) paper aims to identify diverse partnership models elements that have really put in to the collaboration amid the Australian key healthiness wellbeing providers and the current insinuation of policy issues. Thus, partnership is explained as a combined working that entails distinct skilled groups or agencies that are varied in terms of depth and breadth (Dickinson, 2006). Qualitative investigation was used; they categorized models with regard to whether they were principally focused at the level of inter professional or inter organizational alliance. The study gave up differing outcome about a range of factors that have effect on inter expertise association. The authors argue that, the present monetary enticements boost a small extent of multidisciplinary group effort. It operates within their communication and practice scope with team affiliates on a basis that is partial and transactional. These may be appropriate given the restrictions in private and general performance allied with health wellbeing givers. Besides, one study result can be useful to many patients. Some patients with social needs and multifaceted health might call for an immense breadth and depth of inter expertise cooperation. The article is significant given my study concern in implementing models of healthiness wellbeing in the management of clients’ health in Australia. Its gives a wide understanding of the difficulties experienced while using Australian heath care models. It has encountered frequent reforms for more than fifteen years within the general practice. However, less of these reforms have been met in other areas of the major health care. Community wellbeing services are a momentous factor of the Australian health scheme but for over thirty five years the sector has been undersized. Likewise little is known about their expenditure or operation efficiency. The mix of complex services poses a bigger challenge for service harmonization and planning across varied dimensions of provider groups and service types. These benefit persons who exhibit difficult social needs. Majority require rapid contact to a wide range of services where there exist free sharing of information between clients and health givers. The importance of multidisciplinary teamwork for chronic cases management has been recognized in Australia yet the rate of partnership is still low. Hence insufficient synchronized care is still experienced by the sick. Major strategies and study in Australia has concentrated on raising the cooperation of health wellbeing givers and free practitioners. As a result, slight concern is directed towards communal wellbeing services. Currently, the government has got a policy procedure aiming to perk up the synchronization and teamwork within the society and principal health division. This is to reinforce inter expertise and inter institutional association. Through execution of these models, Australia has come up with new imbursement substitute forms; establish primary care organizations at the regional level and the establishment of centres for comprehensive principal health concerns. 2. Hill, N.L., Kolanowski, A.M., Milone-Nuzzo, P., & Yevchak, A. (2011). “Culture Change Models and Resident Health Outcomes in Long-term Care.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43 (1), 30-40. This article aims to evaluate the scientific proof about the implementation effect of comprehensive culture alteration model. This is with reference to the lasting care of the results of locals’ wellbeing. Their qualitative examination reviewed thoroughly eleven articles for results correlated to the health of the residents. There study results were incorporated across various models. Each study was given to various confirmation levels, it was established that the outcomes were contradictory. Even so, employing the model had extensive psychosocial fitness gains to the inhabitants. The article is relevant to my interest in implementing models of health care in the management of clients’ health in Australia. The execution of culture alteration model in the nursing facilities populace will be useful as the residents in the nursing homes have inferior quality of life. This is in comparison to the aged living in the society. Their psychological and physical health has declined; decreased comfort, high symptoms of depression and reduced engagement in optimistic actions. Therefore, the execution of culture modification model will help in converting the manner in which enduring care is offered. With this model implementation, nursing homes will be able to discard the customary medical so as to create an accommodating setting (Grant and Norton, 2003). With this in place, sovereignty, preference, high opinion, self-respect and focused living will be the order of the day. In their study, Hill et al. (2011) spotted four major models of culture change and have undergone some test about their resident fitness results. They are wellspring innovative solutions, green house project and the resident-centered care. Australia has adopted the Eden model and so the traditional nursing facilities have modified their situation to cover flora and fauna and kids. Caregivers and inhabitants are sanctioned so that they are able to formulate conversant decisions. In comparison to results of physical fitness, wellbeing, helplessness and depression are highly susceptible to the model of culture modification. However, the aspect that is extra opposed to adjustment is loneliness. This is attributed to losses that are incurred in person’s old life after being institutionalized. While these models are implemented for the good of residents in nursing facilities, the following should be observed: psychosocial health should be maintained to augment optimistic outcomes for weak elders undergoing manifold losses. To guarantee effectual accomplishment of the culture adjustment model, strong leadership, nurses’ inclusion and change defenders are needed as currently less support is offered. Culture conversion model will boost person-centered interventions. Thus peoples ending will be well again. 3. Fry, M.M. (2009). “Barriers and Facilitators for Successful after Hours Care Model Implementation: Reducing ED Utilization.” Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 12, 137-144. The article by Fry (2009) aim was to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence the sustainability and victory of afterhour’s wellbeing models. This is in reference to their acute wellbeing use. This research was done before in several states such as the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Canada and Australia. From his findings, it was apparent that there existed optimistic impact on the utilization pattern of acute services. Most of the results were based majorly on quasi test. In his study, the triumph and maintenance of afterhour’s wellbeing model were influenced by facilitators and obstacles. The aim of afterhours care model is to limit the service activity on the emergency division. The model comprise the universal practice cooperative services, negligible injury units, ambulance paramedic referrals and roles, phone counsel points and the walk in centers. The studies of these models assist in discovering facilitators plus obstacles that enhance sustainability and achievements. The article is relevant to my interest in implementing models of health wellbeing in managing clients’ health in Australia. Accordingly, the paper will offer me with an insight in the understanding of facilitators and barriers that aid in providing an overview reforms in the Australian principal health care and enlargement of policy. According to Fry’s findings, at the national level, the extensively used model is the telephone triage advice. This is due to their effectiveness and speedy access to facts concerning healthiness. Some of the barriers were identified; one is triage scale in Australia fails in terms of accommodating patients in the principal health care. The tool acts as a determinant of patient exigency. The triage scale limits the nurse in charge of it from recommending clients to other health amenities. Second obstacle come upon is in the ambulance paramedic transfer and role options. In Australian context, the ambulance paramedics are not permitted to handle or assess patients. The third barrier is financial. In summary, there exist noteworthy facilitators and barriers which have impacted the afterhours care achievement. The reforms in the principal fitness care service are possible if first-rate policies are put in place. A feasible framework is presented by the facilitators and obstacles. This framework will ensure acceptance, sustainability and populace results in the Australian principal health wellbeing. Conclusion Australia is on verge of expanding a more comprehensive health care scheme than it has ever had in the previous years. This will be attained if the government pulls its resources together and motivates the public and private agencies. A further study should be carried done on the previous systems that were in place and how the current ones are working. This will allow investors and the government to model a unique package so that services reach all those in need. Healthcare centers should be located in appropriate points to guarantee ease of access. Staff should be empowered; tasks that can be performed by nurses should be stressed on to minimize the time spent by patients in the health care institutions. Proper monetary enticements should be encouraged to inspire health providers thus quality services to those who seek healthcare. References Julie, M., Gawaine, P.D., & Mark, F.H. (2009). “Inter-organizational and Inter-professional Partnership Approaches to Achieve More Coordinated and Integrated Primary and Community Health Services: the Australian experience.” Australian Journal of Primary Health. 15, 262–269. Hill, N.L., Kolanowski, A.M., Milone-Nuzzo, P., & Yevchak, A. (2011). “Culture Change Models and Resident Health Outcomes in Long-term Care.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43 (1), 30-40. Fry, M.M. (2009). “Barriers and Facilitators for Successful after Hours Care Model Implementation: Reducing ED Utilization.” Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 12, 137-144. Horan, T.C., Andrus, M., & Dudeck, M.A. (2008). “CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definition of Health Care–associated Infection and Criteria for Specific Types of Infections in the Acute Care Setting.” American Journal of Infection 36(5): 309-332. Canadian Physiotherapy Association. (2012). Inter-professional Collaboration and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.physiotherapy.ca/getmedia/7f59bd2f-68aa-45c4-aa67 4ca63ccc58a3/Inter-professional-Collaboration_en.pdf.aspx on November 2009. Yeatts, D. E., & Cready, C. M. (2007). “Consequences of Empowered CNA Teams in Nursing Home Settings: A Longitudinal Assessment.” Gerontologist, 47(3): 323–339. Read More