Essays on Toyota Companys Global Production Network Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Toyota Companys Global Production Network " is a good example of a management case study. The global economic complexities, the unevenness, and inequality of geography in the business context are claimed to pose a great problem to companies whose operations are in more than one country. These organizations have, therefore, been forced to incorporate complex interactions and actions with interest groups ranging from the social, cultural, economic, and political fields (Kelly 2013, p. 87). They are therefore forced to embrace dynamism brought by its multi-scalar operation levels in different territories; in this case, the symmetrical power between these parties’ relationship and dynamism is focused on the achievement of a specific geographical outcome.

This paper, therefore, aims to review Toyota’ s Global Production Network as it tries to find out the type of labor that is used in product or service creation at different points of the Global Production Network, the institutional arrangement that best explains this GPN structure and whether the value is evenly captured in the GNP if not who are the major benefiters. Global Production Networks offer global organization and an easy route to the international markets.

Thus, an organization such as Toyota that strives to meet the market specifications in regards to affordability and efficiency of its products is able to gain access to the overseas market and some market intelligence through its Global Production Networks (Amasaka, & Sakai 2009, p. 411). On the other hand, the Global Production Network also enables Toyota to benefit from a steady product demand which is attributed to the company’ s increased productions overseas and the technical assistance it obtains from clients firms within its Global Production Network (Zirpoli and Becker n. d.

pp. 16-17). Therefore, the Global Production networks offers the company attractive intermediaries in its efforts to penetrate the foreign market. Through its Global Production Networks, it has been able to export its products at affordable transactional cost. The type of labor that goes into creating a product or service at the different points in the GPN entails Toyota embracing the notion of subcontracting with specialized suppliers, for instance, the company enlarged its equity in its three main large parts suppliers; Toyota Gosei, Denso and Aishin Seiki (Minhyung 2010, p. 65).

References

Amasaka, K. and Sakai, H., 2009. TPS-QAS, new production quality management model: key to New JIT–Toyota's global production strategy. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 18(4), pp.409-426.

Hatani, F. (2011). Responses to Regionalism in East Asia: Japanese Production Networks in the Automotive Sector - By Andrew J. Staples. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(2), pp.213-215.

HENDERSON, J. and NADVI, K. (2011). Greater China, the challenges of global production networks and the dynamics of transformation. Global Networks, 11(3), pp.285-297.

Ichijo, K. and Kohlbacher, F., 2008. Tapping tacit local knowledge in emerging markets–the Toyota way. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(3), pp.173-186.

Jacobs, A. (2012). Collaborative Regionalism and Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of the Southeast Automotive Core and the "New Domestics". Economic Development Quarterly. p.90.

Jullien, B. and Pardi, T. (2013). Structuring new automotive industries, restructuring old automotive industries and the new geopolitics of the global automotive sector. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 13(2), p.96.

Jürgens, U. ed., 2013. New product development and production networks: global industrial experience. Springer Science & Business Media.

Kelly, P. (2013). Production networks, place and development: Thinking through Global Production Networks in Cavite, Philippines. Geoforum, 44, pp.82-92.

Kim, J. (2006). Sub-regionalism, regionalism, trans-regionalism. Implications for economic integration and international trade policies. Asia Europe Journal, 1(2), pp.183-196.

Kleibert, J. (2016). Pervasive but Neglected: Conceptualising Services and Global Production Networks. Geography Compass, 10(8), pp.333-345.

Klonowski, D. (2008). The consolidation of the automotive parts aftermarket sector in transitioning economies: the case of Poland. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 8(1), p.90.

Koo, C. and Lee, H. (2013). New Regionalism in Northeast Asia: Supra-Regionalism and Sub-Regionalism. Journal of international area studies, 5(2), p.3.

Lander, E. and Liker, J. (2007). The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), pp.3681-3698.

Lee, B. and Jo, H. (2007). The mutation of the Toyota Production System: adapting the TPS at Hyundai Motor Company. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), pp.3665-3679.

Mehri, D. (2012). Restructuring in the Toyota keiretsu during the Asian financial crash. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1(2), pp.138-157.

Minhyung, K., 2010. Risks of global production systems: lessons from Toyota's mass recalls. Seri Quarterly, 3(3), p.65.

Rutherford, T. and Holmes, J., 2008. ‘The flea on the tail of the dog’: power in global production networks and the restructuring of Canadian automotive clusters. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(4), pp.519-544.

Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J. and Gereffi, G., 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of economic geography, p.lbn007.

Sturgeon, T.J., Memedovic, O., Van Biesebroeck, J. and Gereffi, G., 2008. Globalisation of the automotive industry: main features and trends. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 2(1-2), pp.7-24.

Takeishi, A. (2010). Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development. Organization Science, 13(3), pp.321-338.

Tiwana, A. (2013). The Peripheral Knowledge Paradox: Interfirm Knowledge Partitioning and Integration in Services Contracting. Service Science, 5(3), pp.216-237.

Yeung, H.W.C. and Coe, N.M., 2015. Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), pp.29-58.

Zirpoli, F. and Becker, M. (n.d.). Beyond Product Architecture: Division of Labor and Competence Accumulation in Complex Product Development. SSRN Electronic Journal. Pp.16-17.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us