Essays on Google Organization Capability Choosing and Justification Case Study

Tags: Google
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Google Organization Capability Choosing and Justification" is an outstanding example of a business case study. Google’ s technological superiority, in which it was first founded, is its core capability in the engineering department. This technological superiority is essential in the production of new processes and products. Google is the leading search engine on the internet. It has a high speed, reliable, simple to use and user friendly. It is the best-known search engine among the public, making the marketing process easy. It provides numerous products ranging from hardware, web products, Mobile products and desktop products (Spil & Klein, 2014 p.

2018). Capability 2 Financial The financial capability of Google is as a result of increased sales. Being able to generate internal funds and external capital through increased sales leads has been a capability that has enabled Google to grow faster (Jarvis, 2011 p. 234). Capability 3 Reputation Google is well known for products and processes that are of high quality and serve their purposes well. The organization is also well known for being a good employer, by offering its employees an environment of communism, innovation and fun.

Google Inc is renowned for being a socially responsible organization that minds about the community and the environment (Steiber & Alä nge 2013 p. 243). Capability 4 Human Google understands that employee satisfaction is the key to increased productivity and innovativeness. In this regard, the company treats employees in special ways that have mostly been referred to as unconventional. The employees are encouraged to be innovative (Dawkes & Holloway, 2013 p. 688). The organization has a flat organizational structure; therefore, there is very little control. Capability 5 Organizational Google’ s organizational culture is envisioned on communism. While the company is focused on financial performance, it also emphasizes on employee satisfaction.

By creating a sense of purpose and belonging in its workers, Google has experienced continued growth and advancement in the world of technology. The business understanding and smart management by the executives have made the company achieve the rank of one of the most profitable firms in the United States and abroad. Capability 6 Innovation Google offers an environment that is supportive of new ideas. The atmosphere helps employees to learn from each other’ s ideas and methods, adapt them to their own situations and increase their levels of innovation (Dawkes & Holloway, 2013 p.

688). This helps Google to come up with solutions that suit the needs of consumers. 2.0 Capability matching 2.1 Capability matching table Table 2.1 Matching capabilities with the KSFs Key Success Factors (from case study 1) Capabilities (Take the capabilities from S1.3 above. That is, your choice of 5-10 capabilities). Match each capability with each KSF in Column 1) e. g. 1.Research & Development Technological superiority enables Google because to research on the existing products and processes. 2.technological advancement Technological superiority offers the best platform for technology advancement. 3.The innovation of business models The financial capability allows Google to make targeted ads that are relevant to specific users. 4.Brand reputation The brand reputation has provided Google with a competitive edge. 5.Focusing on user experience Innovation has enabled Google to make products that are user friendly. 6.

Human resources An ethical organizational culture that makes sure that the human resources are satisfied has enabled Google to attract and retain the best talent worldwide. Note: All capabilities must be matched with a KSF and vice versa. If more than one capability matches a KSF then use an additional row.

References

List of references

Andreessen, M. (2011). Why Software Is Eating The World'. Wall Street Journal, 20.

Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Visions and voices on emerging challenges in digital business strategy. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 14-001.

Curme, C., Preis, T., Stanley, H. E., & Moat, H. S. (2014). Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(32), 11600-11605.

Dawkes, M. J., & Holloway, C. J. (2013). U.S. Patent Application 13/969,688.

Finkle, T. A. (2012). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Silicon Valley: The Case of Google, Inc. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 863-884.

Hill, C., Jones, G., & Schilling, M. (2014). Strategic Management: Theory: An Integrated Approach. Cengage Learning.

Jarvis, J. (2011). What would Google do?: Reverse-engineering the fastest growing company in the history of the world. Harper Business.

Neville, L. (2012). Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries. Psychological Science, 0956797611435980.

Spil, T., & Klein, R. (2014, January). Personal Health Records Success: Why Google Health Failed and What Does that Mean for Microsoft HealthVault?. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 2818-2827). IEEE.

Steiber, A., & Alänge, S. (2013). A corporate system for continuous innovation: the case of Google Inc. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(2), 243-264.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us