Essays on Difference in Leadership Policies and Choices between Russia and China Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Difference in Leadership Policies and Choices between Russia and China" is a good example of a management case study. Russia and China are two economically powerful countries that underwent market transitions through various economic reforms almost at the same time. In the later periods of the twentieth century, many developing countries marked a serious period of transition from government-directed economies to market economies. The debt crisis that emerged in the early 1980s, for instance, was the major catalyst for the economic transition in the Latin America region for instance though the region already had some implemented market activities that set the stage for implementing market-oriented reforms (Christoper 2009, p. 2-5). Of the many countries that underwent through the transition, the Russian and Chinese reforms were the most dramatic of all.

This is because the two countries had the influence of the Communist revolution that took place widely through a good part of the first half of the 20th century. This revolution attempted to create some sort of socialist “ paradise for workers” between the two nations (Anmin, 2009, p. 2). Consequently, Russia and China transformed their economies from the initial centrally-planned economies to a market-directed economy that greatly changed the dimensions of state-owned enterprises and management in the two countries (Anmin, 2009, p. 4).

The commencement of reforms in China republic took place in the late 1970s while Russia took some time before initiating reforms in the early 1990s. However, the pace of the reforms and the surrounding circumstance in the two countries greatly differed. In Russia for instance, the economic reforms came in place immediately after the demise of communism while the Chinese market-oriented reforms took place in a gradual manner that went on through a long period while at the same time being moderated by the country’ s Communist government (Maxin, 2006, p. 12). Background to Question Research The most crucial research question in this paper is a comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese reforms in state-owned enterprises.

Various researches indicate that there are several sharp differences and a few points of similarity not only in the State-owned enterprise reforms but also the general economic systems and transitions of the two countries (Peter, 2008, p. 8). The most outspoken debate about the difference in the outcome of transition and reforms between the two countries revolves around the initial conditions and the sharp difference in leadership policies and choices between Russia and China (Christopher, 2005, p12).

Another difference emanated from Russians overlooking Chinese reform measures until much later when they realized that the Chinese reforms were effective and efficient. Nonetheless, the two countries shared some common backgrounds after being subjected to military defeats in the late 19th century and early 20th century. After the bloodied wars, Russia and China saw themselves shunning the global capitalist system and turn towards the communist system.

During this communist rule, the Russian and Chinese state-owned and centrally-planned economies depicted several features of similarities and went against the then established Western model of democratic capitalism (Christopher, 2005, p. 5). Later in the 1990s, Russia and China disagreed on various aspects of the model and seemed to take different dimensions with Russia embracing Western integration that valued market democracy as China followed a path that favored preservation of its authoritarian leadership style with very limited engagement and participation in foreign trade and investment (Andrew, 2003, p. 10).

References

Anmin, C 2009, Thirty Years of Chinese Reform - Transition from Planned Economy to Market

Economy, Asian Social Science, vol. 5, no. 3 , p.1-5. Retrieved on May 19, 2013 from;

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CEQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccsenet.org%2Fjournal%2Findex.php%2Fass%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F212%2F174&ei=dvSYUaGuOMe-PNiegJAL&usg=AFQjCNHRwvJwg5tGJTBr-4JR7LNfunZxWQ&sig2=77NA6ZTxNnQgivCmeCAzpA&bvm=bv.46751780,d.ZWU

Aslund, A 2007, Russia’s Capitalist Revolution. Why Market Reform Succeeded and

Democracy Failed.Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved on 19th May 2013 from http://www.iie.com/publications/briefs/anders4099.pdf

Andrew, N., 2003. Authoritarian resilience.Journal of Democracy, 14(1),pp.6-17.Retrieved on

May 19, 2013 from

http://www.asialink.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/532582/Authoritarian_Resilience.pdf

Bao, J. 2005. Change of Governmental Behavior Mechanism in Urban Governance. Ed. X. Zhu.

Chengdu, China: UESTC Press.

Christopher, M 2005, Unparalleled Reforms. China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall and the

Interdependence of Transition, New York, Lexington Books. Retrieved on May 19, 2013 from

http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/christopher-marsh-unparalleled-reforms-china-s-rise-russia-s-fall-and-xPuBsxW97H/1

Brandt, L., Rawski, G & Thomas, R 2008, China's Great Transformation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

George, T., Zhang, P & Zhang, L 2003, The Reform of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Through Employee Ownership of Stock and Participation in Management. Pennsylvania State University: Pennsylvania, Retrieved on 19th May 2013 from http://cog.kent.edu/lib/TseoPeng-zhuLihai.pdf

Frederickson, H. G., 2005. Public Ethics and the New Managerialism: An Axiomatic Theory.”In

Ethics and Public Management. Eds. Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Frederickson, H.G. and K.B. Smith. 2003. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder

CO: Westview Press.

Hughes, N., 2002. China’s Economic Challenge. Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe

Keller, A 2008, The Russian Economy: Past, Present, and Future, Shepherd University

Honors Thesis

Luo, J., 2005. In China Today : An Encyclopedia of Life in the People’s Republic.

Minxin, P 2006, China: Can economic growth continue without political reform? Strategic

Asia 2006, (National Bureau for Asian Research, 2006), p. 303-332.

Paul, R and Kate, Z 2009, How China Won and Russia Lost. Stanford University. Retrieved on

19th May 2013 from http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/5469

Peter, M & Patrick, P 2004, Reforms and Productivity Dynamics in Chinese State-Owned

Enterprises, Discussion Paper No. 1201, Retrieved 19th May 2013 from http://ftp.iza.org/dp1201.pdf

Peter, R 2008. Post-socialist states and the evolution of a new development model: Russia and

China comparison. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, Retrieved on 19th May 2013 from http://prutland.web.wesleyan.edu/Documents/China%20&%20Russia%20Compared.pdf

Rogoff, K 2002, Has Russia Been on the Right Path? International Monetary Fund

Commentary, Retrieved on 19th May 2013 from www.imf.org/external/np/vc/2002/082602.htm.

Shiping, H 2006, The Deng reforms and the Gorbachev reforms revisited.Problems in Post-

Communist Politics, vol. 53, no. 3, p. 3-16

Tsui, A.S., D. Wang, and Y. Zhang. 2002. “Employment Relationships with Chinese Middle-

Managers: Exploring Differences Between State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Firms.” In The Management of Enterprises in the People’s Republic of China. Eds. A.S. Tsui and C. Lau

Walder, A.G. 2006. China’s Private Sector: A Global Perspective. In China’s Domestic Private

Firms. Eds. A.S. Tsui, Y. Bin, and L. Cheng

Wang, X 2009, Thirty Years of Reform and Transition in China and Russia: A Comparative

Analysis, China Economist, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 12-89.

Zhang, W 2009, The 'China Model' of SOE Reform and its Challenges, China Economist, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 23-78.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us