StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
This literature review "The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance" deals with the literature review related to the manager's compensation is linked with the firm’s performance, which is a critical factor in the maximization of shareholders' value. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance"

? The relationship between executive remuneration and corporate performance Table of Contents Introduction 3 Executive Compensation and Firm performance 3 Reference List 8 Introduction Traditional theories of a firm revolve around the concept that entrepreneurs are the owners or the managers of the firm. However, the modern day corporations are characterised by the separation of management and ownership. The decision making power and the control of the firm remains with the management, whereas the stockholders are expected to be benefitted by the decision taken by the managers. At a normative level, the managers are expected to align their personal goals with that of the shareholders and aim toward maximising their values (Chaubey and Kulkarni, 1988). Many of the studies have identified that managerial compensation is linked with the firm’s performance, which is a critical factor in the maximization of shareholders value. The managerial compensation includes base salary, deferred compensation, perquisites and cash bonus. This paper deals with the literature review related to the relationship between compensation of the executives and the performance of the firm. Executive Compensation and Firm performance The advent of the “new economy” industries is a recent phenomenon and not much literature is available which concerns the relationship between performance and pay. Anderson, Banker and Ravindran (2000) have used simultaneous equation model for estimating the performance of the firm and compensation of the executives in the information technology industry and has found evidences that suggest that the share of both pay and bonus increases with the performance. Along with this, the study also suggested that the extent of incentive pay and the level of pay are responsible for positively affecting the performance of the firm. Ittner, Lambert and Larcker (2003) have conducted study based on the data of proprietary sample of firms between 1998 and 1999, which has proved that determinants of equity grants differs in case of old and new economy firms. The study of Ittner, Lambert and Larcker (2003) is complemented by the study of Murphy (2003), who had analyzed the data for much longer period of time starting from 1992 to 2001 and had recorded the effect of the market crash, in 2000, on stock based pay in the firms of “new economy”. The performance of the firm and its size serves as determinants of the pay, which has been suggested by a standard empirical model based on CEO compensation. The firm size is the component that measures the managerial discretion. The compatibility of managerial incentive is indicated by the performance of the firm. The literature related to the compensation of the CEO lacks consensus with respect to the appropriate functional specification. The research scholars like, Coughlan and Schmidt (1985), Hall and Liebman (1998), and Gibbons and Murphy (1992), prefer elasticity specification where the change in or level of the log of executive compensation is linked to the change in or level of log of the firm performance. A different approach has been taken by Jensen and Murphy (1990). They had used sensitivity approach that had linked the change in the compensation level with the change in the performance of the firm. These specifications imply that the relationship between the firm’s performance and the compensation of the employees is contemporaneous only. This signifies that one-time increase in the performance leads to an increase in the compensation of the executives within that period of time. These specifications help to remove the fixed effects related to the firm. In other words, it omits the consistent effect of the time invariant factors such as, the diverse personal characteristics of the CEO, which otherwise might have diverted the estimation of the pay related to performance relationship. A wide spread interest and media attention had thrown light on the pay packages of CEOs in United Kingdom (UK). Eruption of public indignation was seen for the first time in 1995 owing to the news of about 75 percent rise in the salary of Cedric Brown, who was the chief executive of British Gas. The second eruption took place in 1999 due to a compensation package of ?10 million which was awarded to the CEO of Vodafone, Chris Gent, as the firm had successfully taken over Mannesmann, a German mobile phone group. This has initiated several studies by the research scholars on the compensation of the CEOs of organizations based in UK. Girma, Thompson and Wright (2007), have investigated the effect of Cadbury reforms on the compensation packages of the CEOs of various companies in UK. The results of this investigation had suggested that the relationship between the pay and the performance was seen to be weak for the sample of firms that they had picked up for examining during the period of 1981-1996. Gregg, Jewell and Tonks (2005) had complemented the findings of Girma, Thompson and Wright (2007) by suggesting that even their research had found a weak link between the performance of the firm and the CEO pay. The weak statistical results can be due to the fact that the researchers might have heavily relied on the total cash pay, which is the sum of the annual bonuses and the salary in order to measure the compensation of the executives. They have excluded the equity based components of the compensation like, stock awards and stock options. This shortcoming was addressed by the research initiated by Ozkan (2006) where the researcher had included both equity based components and the cash within the compensation of the CEO. The analysis of the research scholar had suggested that there was no significant relationship between CEO performance and performance of the firm in case of a larger sample of companies in UK for the fiscal year 2003-04. The interpretations of these researches propose that the study to establish relationship between CEO compensation and firm’s performance is mixed and hard to interpret. Another study was initiated by Ozkan (2007) and even there, she had included both the cash and equity component while studying the compensation of CEOs for a panel of large firms in UK. In this study, the scholar has used GMM-system estimation method, which establishes a control over the endogeneity of exploratory variables and presence of unobserved firm-specific effects. The empirical results of the research indicate that there exists a significant positive relationship between the level of cash compensation for the CEO and performance of the firm. However, the relationship is positive and insignificant when the total compensation is considered. Gregg, Jewell and Tonks (2011), have examined the relationship between the cash compensation of the executives and the performance of the companies on a large sample of companies based in UK. Their study was strictly restricted to financial services industry, since misalignment of the incentives was considered to be one of the major reasons for the global financial crisis in the year 2007-08. The study suggested that even though the payment in the financial services sector is high, yet the cash pay-performance sensitivity of the banks and other financial firms are not high enough in comparison to the other sectors. The low sensitivity in pay to performance makes it less likely for the incentive structure to be held responsible for causing the bank executives to incline more towards the short-term profits. This study has found that the companies, who have relatively high stock return and high pay-performance elasticity, are seen to exhibit an asymmetric relationship between performance and pay. However, when the stock return is low, the pay of the executives is less sensitive to performance. Heimes and Seemann (2012) had initiated their study on compensation of the executives in firms which are based in Germany and United States (US). These research scholars through their study had analysed the impact of accounting based measures related to the performance of the firm and the performance of the stock market according to the different components of compensation. They found that the total compensation of the executives is dependent on the earnings of the firm in case of both the samples, but stock market performance is not. In case of German executives, the cash bonus payment is explained by the earnings of the firm and not by the stock returns. On the other hand, in case of US, the bonuses are explained by the stock return. Moreover, the study had also suggested that the impact of the cash bonuses on the performance is also dependent on the firm size and risks borne by the firm. Finally, they have concluded that the pay-performance sensitivity is higher is case of US firms as compared to the Germans. Another study conducted by Kaplan (2012) had suggested that the compensation of the CEO has increased substantially through 1990s, but they have declined since then. When the ratio of CEO pay of large companies to the market value of the firm in late 1970s is compared to that of the late 1960s, unlike the level of the former, the level of the later was seen to be lower. This pattern had implied that scale and technology have also played a significant role in driving the pay of the CEO and others. However, the CEOs are awarded for their good performance and penalised for their failures. The board of the company monitors the performance of the CEO. The researcher has also found that the pay policies of the top executives, in about 98 percent of Russell 3000 companies and S&P 500 companies, has received much support from majority of the shareholders. Reference List Anderson, M., Banker, R. and Ravindran, S., 2000. Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46(4), pp. 530-47. Chaubey, M.D. and Kulkarni, M.S., 1988. Executive compensation and performance of Firms. Managerial Finance, 14(4), pp. 14-18. Coughlan, A.T. and Schmidt, R.M., 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), pp. 43-66. Gibbons, R. and Murphy, K.J., 1992. Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), pp. 468-505. Girma, S., Thompson, S. and Wright, P., 2007. Corporate governance reforms and executive compensation. Manchester: The Manchester School. Gregg, P., Jewell, S., and Tonks, I., 2005. Executive Pay and Performance in the UK 1994 – 2002. Working paper. Devon: XFi Centre for Finance and Investment. Gregg, P., Jewell, S., and Tonks, I., 2011. Executive Pay and Performance: Did Bankers’ Bonuses Cause the Crisis? [online] Available at < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1815210> [Accessed 20 November 2013]. Hall, B. and Liebman, J., 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), pp. 653-91. Heimes, M. and Seemann, S., 2012. Which Pay for what Performance? Evidence from Executive Compensation in Germany and the United States [online] Available at < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2084705> [Accessed 20 November 2013]. Ittner, C.D., Lambert, R.A. and Larcker, D.F., 2003. The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-2-3), pp. 89-127. Jensen, M.C. and Murphy, K.J., 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), pp. 225-64. Kaplan, S.N., 2012. Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance in the U.S.: Perceptions, Facts and Challenges [online] Available at < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134208> [Accessed 20 November 2013]. Murphy, K.J., 2003. Stock-based pay in new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-2-3), pp. 129-47. Ozkan, N., 2006. Do corporate governance mechanisms influence CEO compensation? An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. Ozkan, N., 2007. CEO Compensation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of UK Panel Data [online] Available at < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1102703> [Accessed 20 November 2013]. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The relationship between executive remuneration and corporate Literature review”, n.d.)
The relationship between executive remuneration and corporate Literature review. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1492748-the-relationship-between-executive-remuneration
(The Relationship Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Literature Review)
The Relationship Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1492748-the-relationship-between-executive-remuneration.
“The Relationship Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Literature Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1492748-the-relationship-between-executive-remuneration.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance

CEO Remuneration and its Correlation to Firm Performance

The paper "CEO Remuneration and its Correlation to Firm Performance" critically analyzes the correlation between executive remuneration and firm performance.... It is based on the need to establish the role of stakeholders, legislation, and executives in determining executive remuneration.... The intended research offers to give quality insight into the aspects influencing executive remuneration.... he executive remuneration or compensation landscape has greatly and rapidly changed during recent years with executive pay remaining a focal point for the UK Government as well as European Commission, shareholders, and media....
15 Pages (3750 words) Dissertation

Finance and Accounting, Analyzing Remuneration Packages

It is important to note that even in the cases of the above CEOs, their work and performance on the job was impeccable and many would believe that they earned what they had worked hard for (Jensen and Murphyn 2004:15).... However, there is a perception that there was a lot of inadequate disclosure and that they received a little ‘too much' despite their performance.... Though many believe that performance is imperative, others postulate that traits and effective practices determine who one becomes and how much they achieve while at the executive position (Yang 2008:654)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Literature review

What Is Executive Compensation

The ppaer "Employee Reward" provides an understanding that a proper framework needs to be developed which focuses on recruitment of talented executives, key performance indicators, provision of alignment between management and shareholders, and reinforce the organizational culture.... he executive salary planning would start as per the market pay data and the desired competitive range would be decided based on the competitive performance of the executives.... It also includes the inputs and growth in individual responsibility and the high-level performance for the individual (Armstrong, 2002)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Executive Compensation Schemes in Corporate Governance

The writer of the following research "Executive Compensation Schemes in Corporate Governance" would analyze the effectiveness of the executive remuneration implementation in regard to workspace productivity as well as overall organizational performance.... executive remuneration has assumed considerable importance in recent years.... Motivation principles such as encouraging employees' performance and matching rewards to performance can be drawn from the theory....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Executive Remuneration in Australian Companies

Explain how the interests of key stakeholders, including shareholders, should be taken into account in developing an effective regime of executive remuneration for directors and executives of Australian companies. ... he regulatory framework of executive remuneration in Australian companies basically depend on the regulated remuneration cycle which consists of four major activities - remuneration practice; disclosure of remuneration; engagement on remuneration; and voting on remuneration....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

Executive Remuneration Principles and Practice

The paper discusses the executive remuneration principles and practice in the UK from the perspective of the reports published by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) and the High Pay Commission Report. ... Improvement of the corporate governance policies makes the task of decision-making easier.... The remuneration practices for the executives in large financial institutions and industrial firms played a large role in that crisis.... If we look into the matter in this aspect, then a fair remuneration is that which is given as per the market condition and value....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Effective Regime of Executive Remuneration for Directors and Executives of Australian Companies

The author of the following research paper "Effective Regime of executive remuneration for Directors and Executives of Australian Companies" mentions that the regulatory framework of executive remuneration in Australian companies basically depends on the regulated remuneration cycle.... However, this research proposal would demonstrate the shareholders' interest on developing an effective executive remuneration regime for directors and executives and identify an effective remuneration regime in Australia which is needed for development and transparency of the remuneration process and practice in a causal contingency framework of convergence/divergence....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

Reece Australia Limited and Boom Logistics - Governance and Fraud

corporate governance acts as a guide or framework of rules, systems, and processes within which authority is implemented and controlled by corporations.... corporate governance acts as a guide or framework of rules, systems, and processes within which authority is implemented and controlled by corporations.... corporate governance acts as a guide or framework of rules, systems, and processes within which authority is implemented and controlled by corporations....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us