The paper “ Human Resource Selection - Personality Assessments and Selection Interviews” is a convincing example of the literature review on human resources. Societal dynamism has brought about new dispensation in every sphere of life including the organization’ s management which with the stiff competition it has viewed its success on the scale of employee work performance (Gatewood et al. 2010). Human resources have proved to be a quintessential aspect of an organization's performance and success. The resources involved in an organization ought to be utilized effectively and efficiently in order to produce the targeted outcome and/or performance.
To enhance the organization’ s performance, it would be prudent for the human resource management docket to come up with a frame design that will embrace all the essential factors such as the humans, finance, machines, and material. However, more focus must be objectively be entailed in the humans who are perceived as the driving force in an organization. The role played by the humans being vital to include such roles as experience, expertise, good decision making, and favorable competitive advantage embraced by employees and management as propounded by Mathis and Jackson (2011).
To get a grip on what is required in this paperwork, the responsibility of the line manager must be highlighted in which case it involves providing expertise on the technical dimensions which include controlling the relevant resources attached to his docket such as appointing qualified staff (Kerzner 2009). Therefore to be able to capture the talented, skillful, knowledgeable, and experienced staff for the job performance certain factors must be assessed by the line manager and which may include personality assessment which is a typical job performance predictor (Schmitt 2012) as well as the selection interview.
With the above exposition, this paper will endeavor to examine the practicability of the above-mentioned job performance predictors in line with the line manager’ s mandate.
Anderson, M., Personality Assessment in Personnel Selection, viewed on 20 May 2012,
Calhoon, R. (2011). Objectives of Interview, viewed on 20 May 2012,
Catano, V. (2009). Recruitment and Selection in Canada. Toronto: Cengage Learning.
Condrey, S. (2010). Handbook of Human Resource Management in Government. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Fear, R., & Chiron, R. (2002). The Evaluation Interview: How to Probe Deeply, Get Candid Answers, and Predict the Performance of Job Candidates, New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
Gatewood, R., Field, H., & Barrick, M. (2010). Human Resource Selection. London: Cengage Learning.
Joshi, V. (2010). Personnel Management or Human Resource Management. Viewed on 20 May 2012, < http://www.scribd.com/.../Personnel-Management-or-Human-Resource-...>.
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mathis, R., & Jackson, J. (2011). Human Resource Management: Essential Perspectives. London: Cengage Learning.
McGladrey, R. (2007). Mandated Benefits 2008 Compliance Guide. London: Aspen Publishers Online.
Saiyadain. (2009). Human Resources Management. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Sarkar-Barney, S. (2012). Personality Assessment: The Secret to High Quality Employees. Viewed on 20 May 2012,
Schmitt, N. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection. Oxford: Oxford Press.
SHL, Group Plc. (2001). Guidelines for best Practice in Selection Interviewing. Viewed on 20 May 2012
Simola, S. (2007). The Employment Selection Interview: Disparity among Research. Viewed on 20 May 2012
Tsui, A., & Lai, K. (2009). Professional Practices of Human Resource Management in Hong Kong: Linking Hrm to Organizational Success. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ziegler, M, MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. (2011). New Perspectives on Faking in Personality Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.