The paper "Dominant Normative Orientation of Contemporary Industrial Relations" is a great example of an assignment on management. According to the authors, pluralism has been faced with many challenges such as neoliberalism, Marxism, and feminism. These concepts have been against pluralism for quite some time. Despite all this, pluralism has still managed to remain the dominant normative orientation within research and academic-industrial relations. Pluralism comprises of the core beliefs that are concerned with the nature of employment relations. It provides a standard for the evaluation of industrial relations practices.
It also serves as a guide when developing policy advice. Pluralist principles are said to embrace the interests of both the employees and employers. Pluralism believes that both these interests are congruent. It is, therefore, prepared to acknowledge any conflicts of interest that may arise at work and it does not treat them as pathological symptoms because it is aware that such differences are normal. Pluralism also holds that there is an imbalance of power within employment relations. Pluralism should still remain the dominant normative orientation of contemporary industrial relations research because it has been effective in bringing industrial relation reforms.
These reforms have been able to civilize the market order both materially and procedurally. Procedurally, pluralism has helped to protect workers from arbitrary treatment from their employers and has helped to bring about due processes into employment relationships. The rights of workers in terms of how they are treated at their places of work can now be protected because of pluralism. Materially, pluralism has helped to raise the living standards of workers. This is because their stay at work is now safer and their terms of employment can now be easily improved to take care of their interests. The pluralist tradition has seen a continuous search for both major and minor reforms in industrial relations.
Many supporters of pluralism have argued that they have gradually transformed society by refusing to be part of the people who are captures and exploited by certain political parties. They argue that they are advocates of change and that they are responsible for teaching society to recognize its rights and fight for them.