The paper 'Incident Command System and Harrow Court Incident" is a perfect example of a management case study. In this assignment, I am going to discuss the various aspects of the Incident Command System. The report will be based on the high rise flats, Harrow court incident, Stevenage, Hertfordshire. The beginning of the report deals about the history of the Incident Command System, it’ s levels of command, line of command, sectorisation, a span of control, etc. After this description the analysis goes on about instigating the Incident Command System, associating it with high rise flats, specifically for the Harrow court incident.
Later I am going to deal about the awareness of the Dynamic Risk Assessment Principles and the inter-agency liaison for a particular incident. I. Incident Command System: History: An Incident Command System is an on-scene disaster management system. The U. S. National Response Team’ s(NRT) Technical Assistance Document says that the Incident Command System(ICS) was developed in the 1970s to manage the rapidly spreading wildfire in California and it impacts on the urban population in that area. The purpose of the Incident Command System is to manage a response team involving multi-jurisdictional disciplines.
The ICS is best described as the system to have perfect coordination in carrying out effective response. It is committed to addressing the following issues during response/rescue operations like lack of perfect information about the incident, lack of proper planning in executing the rescue operation, no effective tools for communication, etc. The ICS is in practice in the UK and the US. Levels of Command: The levels of command for the ICS was framed by UK Metropolitan police after the 1985 riots in north London.
The structure is called the Gold – Silver – Bronze command structure. Gold Level: This level involves the strategic planners of the Incident Command. They will not be present in the operation site but will be at a distance to delegate commands. If the operation involves various agencies, then the Gold commanders of various levels will work together to plan out the rescue operation. Silver Level: These commanders frame the action plan to be carried out according to the guidelines of the Gold commander. They set out the different tactics of carrying out the response/rescue.
They are not present in the scene but they are close to the bronze commanders who actually carry out the operation. Bronze Level: The bronze commander is present in the scene with the staff working. These commanders take in charge of the management of Incident Command’ s resources, they manage the cordon definitions and they take care of the survivors.
1. Astron, B34681 5/04, ‘ High – Rise – Flats Built to be Fireproof ‘,
< www.dontgivefireahome.com> .
2. City of Hickory Fire Department – ‘Strategic Plan for Service Delivery’ ,
Original March 2000, Revised November 2003,
3. Hertfordshire Fire and Rescue Service , ‘ FIRE AT HARROW COURT,
STEVENAGE - 2 FEBRUARY 2005 –RECOMMENDATIONS’,
Progress Update , 14th May 2008,
4. HertFordShire Fire and Rescue Services, ‘Investigation into the
Deaths of’ , Call Number 1693.
5. Herts24, ‘ Harrow Court : Union claims poor training contributed to the
fire deaths’ ,‘The Comet’,
6. Humberside Fire and Rescue Services, ‘Aide Memoir Mass
Decontamination ‘ , Nov. 2007 ,
7. International Fire Training Centre, ‘ Incident Command, RFFS
Supervisor Initial ‘, Issue 01, March 2006.,
8. Matt Wrack, ‘Automatic Distress Signal Units’ ,’ Our Fire and Rescue
Service Practitioners’ Forum’, Item No 07/42, 10th July 2007,
< www.pforum.fire.gov.uk >
9. National Response Team, ‘Incident Command System / Unified
Command (ICS/UC), Technical Assistance Document ‘, < www.nrt.org>
10. Operational Refresher Course, Student study Pack, Nov. 2006,
Copyright- CROWN Copyright-2004. < www.dftdc.org>.