Essays on High Rise Flats Fire Incident of Harrow Court Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'High Rise Flats Fire Incident of Harrow Court" is a good example of a management case study. In order to meet a fire incident safely, it is very important to have a certain amount of administrative cooperation. However, there came up with a kind of mismanagement in the High rise flats fire incident of Harrow Court, Stevenage, Hertfordshire. In this paper, I am trying to check out al possible measures that would have prevented the incident from disasters and life loss. There are many points that are not followed in this incident and thus resulted in the death of two firemen. Here I am going to make a discussion regarding the aspects that are important to follow in order to have more administrative and secured hold over such accidents. The report introduction ICS developed in the year 1970s.

It was the consequences of massive wildfire-fighting efforts that took place in the state of California. It has been well discovered that communication during an emergency, depends a lot in the management deficiencies. The target of ICS is to modify and systematize these deficiencies.

Due to its active participation in the application of security measures in the emergency scene, ICS has been also called a "first-on-scene" structure. There is the follow up of Gold; Silver and Bronze command structure. These are basically during an emergency in the United Kingdom. These terminologies are used like these as to mention the hierarchical framework for the systematic administrative command and control in case of major incidents and disasters in the state. These are functional on the basis of Strategic, Tactical and Operational sectorisational structure. However, in every respect, the categories are the same. The sectorisational structures do not overtly denote hierarchy of rank in the performing zone.

The types of sectorisation include Gold, Silver and Bronze command structure. These are meant to be for disasters. The functionality lies basically for the purpose of pre-planned operations in the time of crisis.

REFERENCES

Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (1937) (eds), Papers on the Science of Administration, Institute of Public Administration, New York

Koontz, H. (1966) "Making Theory Operational: The Span of Management", The Journal of Management Studies, Vol 3, 1966.

London Emergency Services Liaison Panel: Major Incident Procedure Manual 7th ed, http://www.leslp.gov.uk/ (accessed 29 Jul 08)

Mackenzie, Kenneth D. (1978), Organizational Structures, AHM Publishing Corporation

Samurçay, R. & Rogalski, J. (1988) Analysis of operators cognitive activities in learning and using a method for decision making in public safety. In J. Patrick & K.D. Duncan (eds) Training Human Decision Making and Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Sull. D. E. (2002) Why Good Companies Go Bad. In Harvard Business Review on Culture & Change. Boston MA. Harvard Business School Press

The Fire Experimental Unit’s backdraught simulator, Fire Research News : News of Home Office Fire Research for the Fire Service, Issue 21, Home Office, Winter 1997

Tissington, P.A. (2004a) Command decisions. Fire Engineering Journal, April, pp 42-44.

Walton J. (1999) Strategic Human Resource Development. Prentice Hall

Weick, K.E. & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2001) Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. New York: Jossey-Bass.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Flin, R., & Maran, N. (in press). Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Quality and Safety in Healthcare.

Fennell, J.D.A. (1988) Investigation into the Kings Cross Underground Fire. London:HMSO.

Grimwood, P. (1992) Fog attack: fire fighting strategy and tactics – an international view. Redhill, Surrey: FMJ Publications.

Health and Safety Executive (1997) The fire at Zephaniah Way, Blaina. London:HMSO.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us