The paper "Information Resource Management" Is a great example of a Management Case Study. This study presents an analysis of NASA’ s Chief Information Officer’ s current recommended governance approach; and how he intends to manage Information resource management to satisfy the IT needs of the organization. NASA the short form for National Aeronautics and Space Administration is an agency of the US administration that is in charge of the national space program and for aerospace and aeronautic research. NASA was established in 1958 with specifically civilian orientation encouraging supporting peaceful space science applications.
The agency’ s work is technical and needs a high level of information technology, more so in space and aeronautics operations. In the past, the CIO has not been given authority to recommend the best approach to effective IT infrastructure. The CIO has been marginalized through the organization's structure and powers. This situation has led to insufficient budget, insecure IT systems, unclear relationships between the IT boards, and decentralization of IT governance. Introduction With the curiosity to understand the earth increasing, NASA business and operations have increased tremendously prompting them to increase the number of information technology assets.
This means the agency has increased its research on earth and space. In fact, the agency has over 1,000 unmanned assignments created to explore the solar system and the earth. They are also planning to set up a permanent base in the moon by 2020. All these need a coordinated information flow through technology; a work well cut out in the CIO, Larry N. Sweet’ s role. According to Laudon, Laudon (2005) the CIO must be effective so as to bring together all organization departments and workstation across planets.
With the guidance of Chief Information Officer, the company can create an information technology infrastructure that channels all information to a central point at the headquarters in Washington, D.C, US. In light of this information, the report presents an analysis of NASA’ s Chief Information Officer’ s current or recommended governance approach; and how he intends to manage Information resource management to meet the IT needs of the subject organization. CIO’ s current or recommended governance approach in managing Information resource management In recent Currently, the NASA information technology department is facing several challenges affecting the flow of operations.
The decentralized form of the agency operations and its continuous culture of autonomy have hindered the ability of the agency to execute successful Information Technology governance. The arrangement made Agency CIO to have limited control and visibility over a major Agency’ s IT investments. The CIO also operated in an organizational structure which marginalizes the power that comes with that position, and could not implement security measures within the computer networks of NASA. To handle this situation the CIO recommended the centralization of authority to allow the control, securing of IT systems at the Agency level so as to achieve accountability efficiencies and economies in IT management. However, in 2011, NASA’ s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) allocated a memo shifting the major functions of Federal Chief Information Officers from making policy and maintenance of infrastructure.
The memo mandated that agency provide their CIOs with power over commodity IT, IT governance, information security, and program management. Based on the authority that was bestowed on the CIO he was able to recommend the governance approach NASA could use to manage Information resource management.
First the CIO found the situation of underfunding of the agency. In the financial year 2010, it was only $1.6 billion that was allocated to the Agency yet it spent $2 billion. Therefore the CIO recommended that for the IT department to manage Information resource management effectively they must be given the mandate to prepare a departmental budget. As such, they would a comprehensive budget which can cater to buying new IT gadgets.
Brown, I.T.J. (2004). Testing and extending theory in strategic information systems planning
through literature analysis. Information Resources Management Journal 17 (4), 20–48.
Department of the Interior (DOI). (2005).Information Resources and Technology Management
Strategic Plan: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. PP 1-46 Retrieved on 27th
February 2013 from http://www.fws.gov/irm/docs/FWSIRTMStrategicPlan100705.pdf
Laudon, K.C & Laudon, J.P. (2005). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital
Firm. Prentice-Hall Management, London
NASA. (2013). NASA’S Information Technology Governance. Retrieved on 27th February 2013
from http://oig.nasa.gov/audits/reports/FY13/IG-13-015.pdf, 1-43
Piccoli, G. & Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive
advantage: a review and a synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29 (4), 747–776.
Rogers, S. (2010). NASA budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958.
Weill, P. & Ross, W. (2004). IT Governance. How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights
for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press: Boston/Mass.