The paper "Leadership Challenges, Leadership Style Theories" is a great example of management coursework. Since the time past, there have been no single definitions that have been outlined and spotted to be the main contributing factor to companies that do not perform well. Cultural differences between deserving groups or categories of employees have cost firms and organization of their most important and demanding tasks as wells as reactions to some aspects. Leaders have different modes in which they lead people and the most important thing is that they have diverging traits. Even if sometimes the traits are the same, there are variations in the way they are presented and portrayed to the society under consideration.
In addition, effective leadership enables one to understand how such challenges presented can affect the performance of a company or a group. Accordingly, change of a team leader or a group leader significantly means that the long time procedure of handling things will change and that there are lots of variations to be noted by either group members or employees. Traits are portrayed different and the overall result is either, success or failure which depends upon how one practices the inner understandings and valuations.
Similarly, organizational culture can limit one from exercising his power as a leader especially when he or she is misunderstood by group members. Introduction Since the beginning of the world, leadership has been explained as a role that can be manipulated by different people in different leadership positions. The meetings held were of great importance especially when it is considered that a group of many people presents serious challenges and complex leadership spectrums (Arvey et al 2006, p 3).
During the first meeting, I learned more about what leaders should have and about the challenges that are faced by leaders serving in different capacities. However, from what I encountered from the second meeting, I realized that emotional intelligence is a key requirement towards achieving good results in an organization or in group discussions. This was because, our group leaders presented different character traits that were so diverging from each other and truly, it was an indication that leaders do behave differently even when they serve the same position and agenda.
Similarly, from the third meeting, I learned and enjoyed the lessons because the arguments gave an insight on what happens when cultural integration and good leadership is not corporate in management of human resource and production resources of an institution or organizations. From the meetings, it was realized that a manageable group should consist of three to five members so that views can be easily shared between all participants. Group meetings are critical because they helped me understand how people have different motives and views on different topics.
They can offer different definitions, comments, suggestions, views, recommendations and can also present divergent understanding of the answers (Arvey et al 2006, p 3). Leadership Challenges During the first meeting, I learned about the challenges that are faced by leaders during the time in management. It also enabled me to understand the need to have a leader during any discussion or when an organization is looking for a solution to an identifiable problem. Sometimes answers can only be obtained after holding a consensus. In most cases, generation of conclusions was so difficult to an extent that we were forced to hold small elections to vote for a sentence and comment.
Still, after making conclusions, some of the members could still complain and give different suggestions (Al-Tarawneh 2012, p 3). From this, I learned that it is difficult for one to generate effective results especially when a group comprises of different professions having a tendency of analyzing and describing matters from different professional perspectives. It is through meetings that people can best learn other peoples’ characters because meetings provide a firm platform on which arguments and conclusions on specific topics can be generated and agreed upon (Warrick, 1981, p 157).
There are variations in understanding issues that affect the formulation of questions and answers on recognizable discussable questions. Our meeting consisted of members who presented varied views on different leadership understanding topics (Meyer, Loch, & Pich 2013). Many organizations have suffered greatly and delayed to meet their development and business goals because of gaps that exist when issues related to leadership roles and positions arise. There are variations and considerable divergence that exist when issues are not handled with fairness by a transformative leader.
Al-Tarawneh, H A 2012, “The main factors beyond decision making”, Journal of Management Research, vol. 4 no. 1 p1-23.
Arvey, R. D., Rotundo, M., Johnson, W., Zhang, Z., & McGue, M 2006, The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality: factors. The Leadership Quarterly. Vol 17. P 1-20
Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J 1993, “Transformational leadership and organizational culture”, Public Administration Quartely. Vol. 17 no. 1 p 112-117.
Cherry, K., 2014. Leadership theories: The 8 major leadership theories. Viewed 10 January, 2014, < http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/p/leadtheories.htm>
Dartey-Baah, K.Amponsah-Tawiah, K. & Sekyere-abankwa, V 2011, “Leadership and organizational culture: Relevance in public sector organizations in Ghana”, Business and Management Review. Vol. 1 no. 4 p 59-65.
Fiedler, F. E 1967, Style of leadership and performance of coaching groups. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie. vol 14. no.2 p 200-217.
Jung, D.I 2001, “Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups”, Creativity Res.J. Vol.13 p 185-195.
Meyer, A.D., Loch, C.H., & Pich, M.T, 2013. A framework for project management under uncertainty. Viewed 23 November, 2013,
Northouse, Peter G. (2001). Leadership Theory and Practice, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ogbonna, E. & Harris, L. C 2000, “leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies”, International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 11 no. 4 p 766-788.
Puplampu, B.B 2010, “Leadership as engagement, leadership as a system development: A contextualized Ghanaian study”, European Business Review. Vol. 22 no. 6 p 624-651.
Reardon, K.K., Reardon, K. J. & Rowe, A. J 1998, “Five stages of radical change”, Acquisition Review Quarterly. P 129- 145
Ruderman, M.N. Hannum, K., Leslie, J.B. & Steed, J.L 2001, “Making the connection: Leadership skills and emotional intelligence”, vol 21. no 5 p 3-7.
Schein, E. H 2006, “Organizational Culture and Leadership”, J-B US non-Franchise Leadership, vol. 356 p 3-55.
Warrick, D.D 1981, “Leadership styles and their consequences”, Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation, vol.3 no. 4 p 155-172.