StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership" is a great example of management coursework. The business world is becoming more competitive, and some organizations concentrate on competition forgetting the importance of employees in organizations strategies. It is imperative for organizations to advance the requirements of employees through different frameworks…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership"

Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Name Course Name and Code Date The business world is becoming more competitive, and some organizations concentrate on competition forgetting the importance of employees in organizations strategies. It is imperative for organizations to advance the requirements of employees through different frameworks. Workforce engagement is an example of the framework, which can be employed in advancing the necessities of the organizations. Workforce engagement is a framework for measuring employees’ willingness to give their discretionary effort in helping an organization to achieve organizational goals and objectives. Extensive studies and researchers have been done, and numerous factors contribute to workforce engagement including the role of leadership. The essay discusses the role of leadership in advancing workforce engagement. The quality of leadership influences other employees within an organization. The leaders’ level of engagement is crucial since the leaders would be able to engage other employees (Saran, 2014). It is premised on the understanding of followers through highlighting variables of engagement, which includes mentorship and role models (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). The engaged leaders are able to utilize their experiences and skills to ensure other employees in the organization are engaged (Davies, 2008). Without engaged leadership, organizations are unable to engage the minds and hearts of their employees. Hence, the leaders have to lead as examples in ensuring workforce engagement is achieved. The engagement is also attributed to the changing position of leaders in the organization from directing the employees to leading the employees. Leaders have to appreciate the importance of building honest and trust communication. The communication process should define the direction and to motivate the employees in organizational ideologies (Tims, Bakker and Xanthopoulou, 2011). The leaders have to communicate about the reality of the business through highlighting mission and vision of the organization (Xu and Cooper, 2011). The leaders have to inspire vision and creating enabling environments to achieve organizational requirements (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). Strong leadership and effective communication are crucial during the difficult time since the employees would appreciate the assistance from the management of the organization (Breevaart et al., 2014). The leadership communication should be forthright and frequent, in ensuring the questions employees ask are answered (Xu and Cooper, 2011). The entire purpose of leadership communication is to make the employees feel they are listened even though, at times, the leadership is unable to solve the issues. The purpose is employees’ concerns are being heard, and this is possible through effective communication by leaders, which translates to workforce engagement. The leadership has to come across as connected with the workforce. The leadership has to communicate effectively the organization’s objectives and goals (Vestal, 2012). The leadership also has consistently to demonstrate the values and culture of the organization in all actions and behaviors (Xu and Cooper, 2011). The connection is to ensure the leaders and the employees are at the same level through balancing the organization's interest and the interests of the employee (Tims, Bakker, and Xanthopoulou, 2011). Through these processes, the workforce is filled with excitement for the organization's future. Connecting with the employees enables understanding the challenges and problems of the employees, and through addressing these problems, it is possible to solve the problems (Nasomboon, 2014). Hence, the connection improves employee engagement through aligning organizational requirements and employee interests. Leaders have to engage the employees in career opportunities. Employees aim to advance their careers and receiving advice from the management through providing formal coaching, and mentoring programs are important (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). The leaders have to make time for the workforce, establish clear career paths and talent management strategy. The leaders should highlight the skills and opportunities associated with project work (Ahmed et al. 2015). In such processes, the leaders guide the operations and inspire the employees towards advancing the requirements of the organization. Through investment in the workforce, the workforce is empowered into aligning their respective skills towards organizational requirements. In an organization, different entities are involved in completing an organizational project. The leaders in these organizations have to appreciate the importance of collaboration and continuous development (Xu and Cooper, 2011). The employees have to feel they are valued and appreciated, and this is possible through collaboration. The management or leadership may have different strategic proposals and it is important to cooperate with the employees in determining formulation and implementation of the strategies (Tims, Bakker and Xanthopoulou, 2011). The views of the employees have to be integrated into the final decisions and extensive discussions and engagement done to raise awareness of the project requirements (Breevaart et al., 2014). During the collaboration, aspects of engagement in terms of collecting views and aligning the views to strategic requirements would raise prominence. It is imperative that it is not compulsory for the implementation of the views of the employees but considering these views creates workforce engagement (Rahman and Nas, 2013). The assumption is based on the employees are engaged, and that engagement feeling ensures the requirements of the organization and strategies are capitalized. Accountability and integrity are some variables that advances the requirements of the organization. The accountability should be two way to ensure the employees are engaged. For example, the organization leaders have to uphold high standards of accountability and integrity. The employees will then borrow these values from the leaders and utilize to improve the organizations. Workforce engagement has to be viewed from different angles and actions may advance the engagement requirements (Tims, Bakker and Xanthopoulou, 2011). For instance, if the leaders have high standards of moral and ethical credibility, such levels can be transferred to the employees and these employees engaged in organizational requirements. Communication is one process of learning about an organization and employees can also analyze an organization through observations through the leaders (Pandita and Bedarkar, 2015). The communication within the organization such as unethical and immoral activities may affect the urge of employees to continue operating effectively and being associated with the organization. Thus, leaders have to uphold high standards of accountability and integrity so that the employees can imitate. An open door policy is a communication policy that a leader encourage transparency and openness with the employees of that organization. The employees are encouraged to visit the offices or engage the leaders to address problems, discuss suggestions, ask questions, and concerns with management (Xu and Cooper, 2011). An open door policy aim is to foster mutual respect, discuss suggestions, and ask questions between the employees and leaders (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). The open door policy is a management mechanism and practice, which serves to champion workforce morale and empowerment, with the aims of improving corporate ethical standards, growth, productivity and efficiency (Tims, Bakker and Xanthopoulou, 2011). These numerous processes are important because it encourages the employees to contribute to organizations and have the capacities to query any action or decision. In addition, it is easier to highlight shortcomings and complaints, which sometimes affects the morale and inspiration of the employees. Therefore, employee engagement can be championed by leaders in advancing open door policy in ensuring the employees are engaged. Organizational structure and management of the employees and general organization operations. However, in recruitment and hiring of the employees, certain skills and experiences were asked including human resource developed provisions. Such approaches are usually proposed and supported by the leaders. The leaders have to give the employees anatomy in their respective operations because of the skills and experiences discussed during the recruitment and hiring periods (Tims, Bakker, and Xanthopoulou, 2011). The employees have to utilize their skills and allowed to make decisions based on their experiences and skills. Following and directing the employees sometimes affects workforce engagement because they perceive the leaders do not have trust to appreciate their skills and experiences (Chandani et al. 2016). In an organization, numerous employees are employed and to engage these employees, it is important to give the employees freedom of operation; if the employees feel they are trusted, the chances increase of work satisfaction creating an aspect of workforce engagement (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland, 2010). Therefore, the workforce engagement because efficient and successful provided the trust and anatomy are championed. A culture of responsive engagement is important. The leaders have to ask for feedback and address themes of the feedback. It can be in the form of suggestions or proposals, and the leaders have to integrate some of these feedbacks to the development of organization (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland, 2010). The employees should not shy in requesting for directions or feel they will be penalized or viewed negatively by the management. Leaders have to create a feedback-oriented environment encouraging the employees to see the significance of their different contributions to the organization (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). The workforce engagement incorporates the word engagement meaning the needs and views of the employees have to be considered. The consideration has to integrate the goals and objectives of the organization, and the proposed future of the organization (Tims, Bakker, and Xanthopoulou, 2011). The feedback should be immediate and reflect the importance of the organization. Some employees may require immediate feedback, and dealing the feedback may degrade the value of feedback environment. Thus, constructive feedback framework championed by the management is important in advancing the workforce engagement and associated dynamics. Fostering meaningful relationship is crucial in accomplishing the requirements of workforce engagement. The relationship should go beyond the normal workplace requirements and incorporate aspects of personal or individual tasks. For example, organizations that recognizes the birthdays and specialize periods of an employee increases positive interaction, which contributes to meaningful relationship (Zhang and Bartol, 2010). Through cultivating meaningful relationships, leaders ensure the employees appreciates the purpose of their work and take self-importance in both organization and individual work as a whole (Ford and Harding, 2011). A strong bond between the employee and leaders in an organization is an essential component in pride building. Pride, trust and relationship are integral in workforce engagement. The meaningful relationship is associated with continual recognition through description on the direction the organization takes and also provides constructive criticism (Tims, Bakker and Xanthopoulou, 2011). The meaningful relationship incorporates one-to-one interactions such as picking phone and tone of communication. Fostering meaningful relationship incorporate numerous variables, which defines engagement between the different employees within the organization (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland, 2010). The target is not the leadership alone but the approach the leadership takes in advancing positive interaction and engagement (Xu and Cooper, 2011). If meaningful relationship is fostered within the organization, the relationship between or among the different employees is encouraged resulting in workforce engagement. In conclusion, the business world is dynamic and keep changing requiring effective workforce engagement. Workforce engagement is the internal urge for the employees to complete assigned duties and be contented with the employees. Leaders play an important role in championing workforce engagement. The leaders have numerous tools, which can be employed in advancing workforce engagement. Effective communication, fostering meaningful relationship, open door policy, honest and true communications and employees’ autonomy are some of areas that leaders can utilize to ensure the employees are engaged. The leaders have the resource and can distribute the resources to reflect and address the requirements of the employees. The leaders are tasked with leading, managing and assigning resources in which the leaders can consider the employees. Effective leadership has to incorporate different dynamics of business and appreciate employees has a significant asset to the organization. Strategies such as constructive criticism, timely feedback, and collaboration assists in formulating and implementing strategies in light of organizational requirements. Hence, effective leadership is integral to advancing workforce engagement. References Ahmed, U., Phulpoto, W., Umrani, W.A. and Abbas, S.I., 2015. Diving Deep in Employee Training to Understand Employee Engagement. Business and Economics Journal, 2016. Babcock-Roberson, M.E. and Strickland, O.J., 2010. The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), pp. 313-326. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O.K. and Espevik, R., 2014. Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), pp.138-157. Chandani, A., Mehta, M., Mall, A. and Khokhar, V. 2016. Employee engagement: A review paper on factors affecting employee engagement. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(15). Davies, B. 2008. Leadership: Theory and practice20081Peter G. Northouse. Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2007. , ISBN: 978‐1‐4129‐4161‐7 4th Ed’, International Journal of Educational Management, 22(7), pp. 710–710. Ford, J. and Harding, N. 2011. The impossibility of the “true self” of authentic leadership. Leadership, 7(4), pp. 463–479. Nasomboon, B. 2014. The relationship among leadership commitment, organizational performance, and employee engagement. International Business Research, 7(9). Pandita, D. and Bedarkar, M. 2015. Factors affecting employee performance: A conceptual study on the drivers of employee engagement. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 8(7), p. 29. Rahman, W. and Nas, Z. 2013. Employee development and turnover intention: Theory validation. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(6), pp. 564–579. Saran, S. 2014. Employee engagement: Leveraging strengths and underpinning weaknesses (identifying the factors underlying employee engagement levels in an organization). Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(3), p. 47. Tims, M., Bakker, A.B. and Xanthopoulou, D., 2011. Do transformational leaders enhance their followers' daily work engagement? The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), pp. 121-131. Vestal, K. 2012. Which matters: Employee satisfaction or employee engagement? Nurse Leader, 10(6), pp. 10–11. Xu, J. and Cooper T.H. 2011. How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(4), pp. 399–416. Xu, J. and Cooper, H., 2011. How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(4), pp. 399-416. Zhang, X. and Bartol, K.M., 2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), pp. 107-128. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Coursework, n.d.)
Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Coursework. https://studentshare.org/management/2086524-management-1-managing-people
(Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Coursework)
Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Coursework. https://studentshare.org/management/2086524-management-1-managing-people.
“Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership Coursework”. https://studentshare.org/management/2086524-management-1-managing-people.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Managing People: Workforce Engagement and Leadership

Comparison of Workforce Motivation between Nampak and Ginster Companies

… The paper "Comparison of workforce Motivation between Nampak and Ginster Companies " is a great example of a management case study.... nbsp;Performance management aims at actively involving the workforce in the Company activities with the aim of increasing the performance of the Company.... In this case study, Nampak Company and Ginsters are compared and the strategies they apply to motivate their workforce.... The paper "Comparison of workforce Motivation between Nampak and Ginster Companies " is a great example of a management case study....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Importance Of Communication Within Organizations

That kind of leadership is threatening to the employees who word under a few from the manager.... The only way a company can reach out to many possible and willing customers and clients is through the engagement of media in the advertisement.... After the engagement with Stephanie Burke, she highlighted that after the company was taken by 6 Steps & Rising, the compensation in terms of benefits and perks was lost.... Mike Zhang, the new managing director for the Melbourne officer has identified that the company is not running well....
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study

People Management as the Management of Their Culture

The other argument in favour of the role of managers in managing people emanates from the fact that managers understand and heighten the significance of organisational culture as pertains to the integration and coordination of the different units of the organisation.... … The paper "people Management as the Management of Their Culture" is a perfect example of management coursework.... nbsp;The common understanding of the role of managers is to 'manage people'....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Leading and Managing People

… The paper "Leading and managing people" is a great example of a Management Case Study.... nbsp; The paper "Leading and managing people" is a great example of a Management Case Study.... The paper will also discuss why leaders might perceive value in broad-based stakeholder engagement as a means of knowledge creation and collaborative action at the various stages of organizational and business development concerning mobile telephony in Africa....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

The Major Challenges Associated with the Implementation of Global Leadership Development

… The paper 'The Major Challenges Associated with the Implementation of Global leadership Development' is a wonderful example of a Management Essay.... nbsp; The paper 'The Major Challenges Associated with the Implementation of Global leadership Development' is a wonderful example of a Management Essay.... The essay looks towards evaluating the manner global leadership is gaining prominence and the different challenges that the global leadership presents....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Affirmative Action and Managing Cultural Diversity Challenge

In addition to this, organizations have to come up with appropriate human resource management systems that enable them to harmonize a culturally diverse workforce.... … The paper "Affirmative Action and managing Cultural Diversity Challenge" is a great example of a Management Case Study.... nbsp; The paper "Affirmative Action and managing Cultural Diversity Challenge" is a great example of a Management Case Study.... One of the crucial challenges that organizations face while managing operations in the global scene are cultural differences....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Motivation Across Generations

Nonetheless, there are also young people in the workforce with their expectations.... Nonetheless, there are also young people in the workforce with their expectations.... Much emphasis will however be placed on different workforce generations in the populations and the motivation issues involved for each generation....
10 Pages (2500 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us