Can Managers Exercise Their Managerial Prerogative without Interference from Actors in Employment - Coursework Example

The issue as to whether managers can exercise their managerial prerogative without interference from actors in employment has been discussed by various stakeholders within the business sector. In this case there are two sides of argument. One side constitutes of the managers themselves while the other side consists of the actors in the employment relations. Majority of the actors in employment relations assert that managers cannot exercise their managerial prerogative on their own. On the other hand, the managers argue that they are capable of carrying out their managerial duties without these external interferences. This paper is dealing with this issue in depth. Managers can actually not exercise their managerial prerogative without interference from actors in employment relations. These actors include trade unions, employees and the state. The reason why managers cannot exercise their managerial rights without such interferences is because these other stakeholders are directly or indirectly linked to their management. (Garth and Jennifer, 1998) For example, the state puts in place policies concerning running of businesses. This includes policies concerning the starting of business. This is where managers have to officially register the business. Other policies include those that govern the payment of taxes by the business. There are still other policies that relate to the way managers carry out their responsibilities in relation to their employees. There are policies that govern the steps that a foreign business can start up a branch within the nation. All these steps always have to be followed for the organisation to be in harmony with the state. This includes terms of employment, payments and even the employee-employer relations. There are many cases where employers violate these rules and regulations set by the government. For instance the state always has to ensure that all managers pay taxes. Each and every organisation has to prepare documents on an annual basis. These documents clearly show the amount of profits that were accrued in the financial year. There are some managers who are so crafty such that they don’t give in the right figures. Each state usually has employees who have to carry out auditing in the organisations. In this case this venture is carried out to ensure that correct figures are submitted and that there is no embezzlement of funds. This means that there is no way that managers can carry out their managerial prerogative without interference from the state. In case this happens, then many business organisations will not pay tax or not give the required amount. This will result in a nation without sufficient resources to run its endeavours. The state is forced to interfere with the managerial prerogative concerning payment of salaries and wages to employees. Every state has got rules and regulations concerning payment of salaries and wages. This concerns the amount in relation to job group. This also concerns when managers should pay their employees. There are some organisations which don’t pay employees on time. Others still underpay employees. This forces the state to come in. Therefore the interference by the state is very healthy because at the end of the day, fairness is enhanced. (Hilltop, 1994) There are also many other issues that force the state to interfere with managerial prerogative in organisations. There are cases where managers misuse their power in the organisation. This is where there are cases of sexual harassment especially on female employees. Such cases normally involve threats from the management concerning loss of job in case the employee does not comply. Once the state comes to know of such issues, then it has to intervene. This is to ensure that the employees do not continue going through such issues. The fact that such behaviours have become so rampant in the past shows that the state has to intervene. This will enhance proper relations among the managers and the employees. It also helps managers to be responsible in their actions. Therefore managers cannot exercise their managerial prerogative without interference from actors like the state. This is bearing in mind that managers are just human beings and sometimes they fail. Therefore the state has to ensure that checks and balances are maintained. Employees definitely have to interfere with manager’s exercise of their managerial prerogative. Human resource management involves various issues which include planning, organising, controlling and leading. All these issues affect employees in one way or the other. (Maundy, 2001) Employees who are experienced in their jobs will always have the confidence to give in their input during the planning process. Analysis shows that an organisation that allows employees to give their ideas always performs well. When it comes to organising, the employees are the ones who implement and therefore they have to give their ideas where planned strategies are not working. Controls sometimes are too tough on employees and this means that they can’t work effectively. This means that they have to communicate to the management concerning controls that are not realistic. Another issue as to why employees have to interfere with managerial matters is that the results are always good. Analysis shows that organisations that allow employees to speak out issues that affect them always have motivated employees. When employees speak out on managerial issues that adversely affect them, it makes the management to be aware that there are problems that need attention. When the managerial team acts on these problems, there results in a motivated team. This definitely enhances success within the organisation. Another group involves the trade unions. Trade unions are an organized group of employees officially recognized by the government. Trade unions have a responsibility of ensuring that employees get the value of what they work for. They are in charge of issues like enacting policies at the workplace. Trade unions just have to interfere with the managerial prerogative in organisations. This is because as illustrated above, these organisations have to ensure that employees are not mistreated in any way. Therefore as managers carry out their responsibilities they sometimes fail to follow the terms that they agreed with the employees. Trade unions are normally referred to as the employees’ voice. They just have to interfere especially where the employees’ rights are violated. (David, 1987) Other issues that trade unions deal with include negotiating on behalf of employees to their employers concerning wages. They also deal with any complaints that workers have concerning promotions, firing and even hiring carried out by employers. Trade unions normally comprise of workers that have worked in an organisation in past years, professionals in various fields and current employees. The overall concerns of trade unions include enhancement of available conditions in employment set up. The employees use the trade unions to negotiate with the employer better terms. Most of the organisations today are characterized by long and destructive conflicts. The bargaining power of the unions are in most cases is concerned about solving the employee’s disputes, negotiating deals that lead to compromise and reconciliation. True resolutions of interest between the capital owners and the labour can then be found. For this reason, managers cannot carry out their managerial prerogative without the interference of stakeholders like trade unions. The trade unions however need to interfere in a decent manner. They don’t have to downplay the managers’ position in the organisation. When handled in a very respective manner, there usually results in positive changes. (Gall, 2004) Work place will never be an equal ground with employers who believe that it’s their right to control the employees. In many cases the employer who has invested a lot of capital in the organisation formulates company regulations and procedures that they protect his investments. As it is hard for employees to have same rights in a work place in an environment where the managers dictates what the employees do. The managers on the other hand argue that they can carry out their managerial prerogative without interference from these external stakeholders. The argument in this case is that in this twenty first century, management consists of qualified personnel. This means that they can carry out their managerial duties without the interference. They argue that the interferences are time wasting and this time would be used in increment of production. Many organisations in the twenty first century have external auditors who carry out evaluations on the organisations. Managers also go for seminars and trainings where they are taught on how to effectively carry out their responsibilities. They therefore feel that the interferences from actors in employment relations do not change anything. (Robbins, 2004) Managers actually argue that trade unions as actors in the employment relations are not balanced in their approaches. Managers assert that trade unions just stand their ground for employees even when the employees are on the wrong. Furthermore they have other hidden motives. The argument concerning interference from employees is that they mostly have unattainable demands. This is especially in relation to their salaries and wages. Managers assert that salaries and wages are highly affected by the performance of the organisation. Many businesses normally incur losses and yet the employees expect salary increments from their managers. In most cases employees do not approach disputes at the workplace with a sober mind. They never want to acknowledge their mistakes in relation to the disputes at hand. (Rampton, 2003) In conclusion, there are various arguments concerning the interference of actors in employment relations in relation to managerial prerogative. The external actors of in employment relations assert that managers in most cases misuse their positions within the organisation. For instance, trade unions help in the championing of the employees’ rights concerning various issues. This includes negotiation of better employment terms, complaints concerning hiring and firing among other issues. Managers cannot carry out their managerial prerogative without interference from the state. This is considering the fact that the state puts in place policies that have to be followed by organisations. Follow up always has to be carried out to ensure that the law of the land is not violated in the venture of managers carrying out their managerial prerogative. Many managers are carrying out illegal businesses like selling of illegal drugs. Other managers do not pay their taxes. These forces the state to interfere with their managerial prerogative to ensure that law and order is adhered to. Managers still argue that in the twenty first century, they are educated enough to handle their own issues related to their job profile. All in all research has shown that managers cannot handle their managerial prerogative without interference from external actors if the best is to be achieved. Read More