Essays on Understanding the Interactions between Stakeholders and Entrepreneurs in Organizations Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Understanding the Interactions between Stakeholders and Entrepreneurs in Organizations" is a wonderful example of an assignment on management. Organizational vision can be defined as the projection of the future state of an organization. The organization sets its motives and standards to motivate its actions in relation to its vision (Bartsch, Christof, and Frank Heideloff 218). Vision provides guidance to an organization by stating what it wishes to achieve. There is a connection between organizational vision and social construction of change achieved from narration and storytelling. The organization’ s vision is created and expressed in creative ways that offer new intelligibility and construct new realities.

Various accounts of learning, vision building, and innovation and business models have acknowledged the social dimension to the development of businesses and inaction (Bartsch, Christof, and Frank Heideloff 219). Reaction to organizational change is one aspect that social construction may have an impact on. Organizational change takes place when an organization transitions from the state it is currently, to a desired future state. This essay explains the concept of the social construction of realities of change and resistance, in relation to organizational vision and helps to improve one's understanding of interactions between stakeholders and entrepreneurs in organizations.

The essay also describes the ways in which individual notions and collective identity and organization are produced over time through background conversations. Finally, the essay discusses processes such as dialogical conversations that organizational leaders and managers can use when implementing change. The social construction of reality or social constructionism is a theory that offers a framework, which focuses on the process that can be used to understand and address social change in a postmodern society or organization (Downing, 185).

The social construction of reality theory, states that meaning, significance, and understanding are developed in collaboration with other human beings, rather than within an individual (Downing 185).  


Baitsch, Christof, and Frank Heideloff. "Collective construction changes organizational reality: An illustration of the relative influence of both consultants and organizations." Journal of Organizational Change Management 10.3 (1997): 217-234.

Burr, Vivien. Social constructionism. Psychology Press, 2003.

Caldwell, Raymond. "Change leaders and change managers: different or complementary?." Leadership & Organization Development Journal 24.5 (2003): 285-293.

Camargo-Borges, Celiane, and Emerson F. Rasera. "Social Constructionism in the Context of Organization Development Dialogue, Imagination, and Co-Creation as Resources of Change." SAGE Open 3.2 (2013): 2158244013487540.

Derue, D. Scott, and Susan J. Ashford. "Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations." Academy of Management Review 35.4 (2010): 627-647.

Downing, Stephen. "The social construction of entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29.2 (2005): 185-204.

Ford, Jeffrey D., Laurie W. Ford, and Randall T. McNamara. "Resistance and the background conversations of change." Journal of Organizational Change Management 15.2 (2002): 105-121.

Jabri, Muayyad. Managing organizational change: Process, social construction and dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Johansson, Anders W. "Consulting as story-making." Journal of Management Development 23.4 (2004): 339-354.

Ran, Bing, and Timothy J. Golden. "Who are we? The social construction of organizational identity through sense-exchanging." Administration & Society (2011): 0095399711412727.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us