The paper "The Three Organization Theory Perspectives" is a great example of a business article. The aim of organizational theory is to understand the internal working, formal structure and external environment of complex behavior depicted by humans within organizations. Organization theory has gone through transmutation over the past few years bringing into consideration three specific perspectives: modernism, interpretivism and postmodernism. In fact, Albrow (1997) states that “ Each attempt to set out the principles of organization as a coherent rational theory rapidly becomes more than a relic of the changing times” (p.
152). Thus, different organizational theory perspective occurs due to changing times and changing reality. Albrow (1997) regarding the basis of the different perspectives asserts that “ postmodern theorizing then ceases to hold the same relation to organizational reality which modern organization theory once had to the modern organization, neither foundation nor mirror” (p. 152). Netting and O’ Connor (2008) references the writings of Morgan (1997) in the published book Images of Organization acknowledges that “ that all theories of organization and management are based on implicit images or metaphors that lead us to see, understand, and manage organizations in distinctive yet practical ways” (p.
23). In this case, metaphors are the attempts that are required to understand one element of experience in relation to another. Thus, the assumptions and principles that are embraced by each perspective are varied. The factors that play an important role in the way that the organizational theories are approached and viewed as different are the structures, organizational effectiveness and technological capability. Netting and O’ Connor (2008) states that “ each perspective brings with it certain insights and emphasizes particular aspects of organizational life while overlooking other essential elements” (p.
25). This then illustrates the ideologies that are expressed by each perspective. Generally, modernism a perspective that began during the Revolution period brings into focus theories such as those of Weber, Fayol and the likes. Postmodernism tries to maneuver away from this perspective and elaborates the changing requirements of current organizations and tasks that are supposed to be accomplished.
Albrow, M. (1997). Do Organizations Have Feelings? London: Taylor & Francis Publishers.
Ashcraft, K. & Mumby, D. (2003). Reworking Gender: A Feminist Communicology of Organization. New York: Sage Publishers.
Hatch, M. & Cunliffe, A. (2006). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives, 2nd Ed. London: Oxford University Press.
Hassard, J. & Parker, M. (1993). Postmodernism and Organizations. New York: Sage Publishers.
Heath, R. & Bryant, J. (2000). Human Communication Theory and Research: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges, 2nd Ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hickman, G. (1998). Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era. New York: Sage Publishers.
Lynch, T. & Cruise, P. (2006). Handbook of Organization Theory and Management: the Philosophical Approach, 2nd Ed. New York: CRC Press.
Lumpe, M. (2008). Leadership and Organization in the Aviation Industry. London: Ashgate Publishers.
Lewis, D. (2001). The Management of Non-Governmental Development Organizations: An Introduction. London: Routledge Publishers.
McKinlay, A. & Starkey, K. (1998). Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: from Panopticon to the Technologies of Self. New York: Sage Publishers.
Netting, E. & Katherine, M. (2008). Organization Practice: A Guide to Understanding Human Service Organization. New York: John Wiley and Sons Publishers.
Tsoukas, H. & Knudsen, C. (2003). The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
Vibert, C. (2004). Theories of Macro Organizational Behavior: A Handbook of Ideas and Explanations. New York: M.E. Sharpe Publishers.