Essays on Public Relations Strategies for Permeate Milk Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Public Relations Strategies for Permeate Milk " is an outstanding example of a marketing case study. Public Relations is important as it helps solve marketing issues that are affecting an organization. Public Relations is used to persuade and gain support from the company’ s public and stakeholders. Since the introduction of permeate free milk, the consumers and other stakeholders of the dairy farmers started losing their trust in the dairy farmers' products (Kemp, 2012). This paper will discuss the responses of the company to this issue; the company response was guided using the two-way asymmetric theory.

The recommended alternative response to this issue used the co-orientation model. The interpersonal bit of the model was explained using the mental model. The mental model explains how an individual’ s behavior and thinking can influence how one deals with a crisis (McPhail, 2002, p. 15). The paper will discuss the ethics that guided the decision of using the alternative response that was given. The ethical factors that are discussed are how one's decisions are bound by the obligation they have to a particular group or person.

Finally, the paper will discuss the ethical theories that guided the alternative response this is utilitarian theory and the teleology theory. When coming up with Public Relations strategies, a company has to consider a few things like, who the target audience is and the ethics of the tactics one will use. The other important consideration that a company should have in mind is the expected end result (Johnston & Zawawi, 2009, p. 41). The strategy that the company decides to use should be aligned with the goal and objective of the whole process (Motion & Weaver, 2005, p. 44).

The main purpose of coming up with a PR strategy is to create awareness of the targeted audience (Heath, 2005, p. 11). In case of a crisis, a PR strategy aims at salvaging the situation to a better one. The dairy farmers put these considerations to come up with a response to the consumers’ feedback. The company’ s response targeted the consumers of the company’ s product. The consumers are targeted because they are among the most important stakeholders in the company (Newson et al, 2010, p. 119).

The consumers are important since they are the main reason the company functions. Without consumers, the products will not be of any importance to the company. The response was made to the consumers since the company wants to retain them. Losing the consumers will have adverse negative effects on the company as the consumers are among the most important stakeholders of the dairy farmers (Freudenburg et al, 1993, p. 31). This response was made to make the consumers understand the reason why the companies shifted from producing permeate milk to permeate free milk. The company chose to use the two-way asymmetric model.

This model uses scientific persuasion (Oliver, 2010, p. 32). With this model, the company disseminates information and receives feedback from the public (Wilcox et al, 1998, p. 49). The company does not have to consider the feedback of the consumers when making the decisions. The feedback can be used to come up with a better persuasive strategy than the original one. This model has an imbalanced influence. The organization gives information to the media and the media, in turn, the media influences the publics’ perception of the organization and the public give feedback to the organization (Kitchen, 1999, p. 102).

The main purpose of using the two-way asymmetric model was to persuade the stakeholders to accept the terms of the organization (Preece et al, 1998, p. 46). The model is imbalanced as the organization does not take into consideration the feedback when making decisions instead they use it to find persuasive strategies (Heath & Vasquez, 2001, p. 62).


Adams, R. M. (1999). Finite and infinite goods: A framework for ethics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Agich, G. J. (2003). Dependence and autonomy in old age: An ethical framework for long term care. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. (1996). Role theory; concepts and research. New York: Wiley.

Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Burger, E. J., Jr. (1984). Health risks: The challenge of informing the public. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.

Carney, J. K. (2006). Public health in action: practicing in the real world. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Chaffee, S. H. (1991). Communication concepts 1: Explication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chase, W. H. (1977). Public issue management: The new science. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Chase, W. H. (1984). Issue management: Origins of the future. Stamford, CT: Issue Action Publications.

Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the“appropriate” crisis response strategies. Boston,Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Diggs-Brown, B. (2012). Strategic public relations: An audience-focused approach. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Du, P. D. F. (2000). Introduction to public relations and advertising. Lansdowne: Juta.

Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1993). The mass media and risk perception. In B. Ruck (Ed.), Risk is a construct. Perceptions of risk perception. Munich: Knesebeck.

Freudenburg, W. R., Coleman, C., Gonzales, J., & Helgeland, C. (1993). Media coverage of hazard events. Analyzing the assumptions. Risk Analysis. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.

Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology,

Glasgow University Media Group. (1980). More bad news. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Grunig, J. E. (2005). Situational Theory of Publics: Encyclopedia of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Grunig, J. (2006). Furnishing the Edifice: Ongoing Research on Public Relations as a Strategic Management Function. Journal of public relations research, 18(2), 151–176.

Heath, R. L. (2005). Encyclopedia of public relations. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.

Heath, R. L., & Vasquez, G. (2001). Handbook of public relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Holtz, S. (1999). Public relations on the Net winning strategies to inform and influence the investment community, the government, the public and more. New York: AMACOM.

Huber, V. L., Neale, M. A., & Northcroft, G. B. (1987). Decision bias and personnel selection strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Johnston, J., & Zawawi, C. (2009). Public relations: Theory and practice. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.

Kemp, M. (2012). South Australian farmers launch milk war against discounting supermarkets. News Limited. Retrieved from australian-farmers-launch-milk-war-against-discounting-supermarkets/storyfnagkbpv- 1226444485092.

Kitchen, P. J. (1999). Public relations: Principles and practice. London: International Thomson Business Press

Laffort, J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives: the principle agent model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

McPhail, T. L. (2002). Global communication: theories, stakeholders, and trends. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Moloney, K. (2006). Rethinking public relations: PR propaganda and democracy. (2nded.). London: Routledge.

Motion, J., & Weaver, C. K. (2005). A discourse perspective for critical public relations research: Life sciences network and the battle for truth. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.

Newson, D., Turk, J. V., Kruckeberg, D. (2010). This is PR: the realities of public relations. (10th ed). Boston, Ma: Wadsworth.

Oakley, J, & Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oliver, S., & Chartered Institute of Public Relations. (2010). Public relations strategy. London: Kogan Page/CIPR.

Parson, P. (2004). Ethics in public relations: guide to the best practice. London: Kogan Page.

Preece, C. N., Moodley, K., & Smith, A. M. (1998). Corporate communications in public relations strategies for successful business and projects. London: Blackwell Science.

Rawlins, B. (2006). Prioritizing Stakeholders for Public Relations. Institute for Public Relations.

Shepherd, T. (2012). ICB: Are the permeate-free claims just out to milk you?. The Punch. Retrieved from just-out-to-milk you/.

Smith, R. D. (2002). Strategic planning for public relations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Strategic Public Relations Management Planning and Managing Effective Communications Program (2nd ed). (2006). Taylor & Francis: Routledge.

Werkmeister, W. H. (1961). Theories of ethics. Lincoln, Neb: Johnsen Pub. Co.

Wilcox, D. L., Ault, P. H. & Agee, W. K. (1998). Public relations: strategies and tactics. (5th ed). New York: Longman.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us