Essays on Planning and Playing Game Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Planning and Playing Game" is a great example of management coursework.   It is important to understand individual differences in order to study organizational activities and management. A direct effect on behavior is caused by individual differences. Every individual differs because of their surroundings, individuality, requirements, and their perception of other people and the world. Individual perceptions play a big role in a person behavior. Individuals with diverse personalities relate in their own way with superiors, colleagues, juniors, and clients. The success of an organization and a person are shaped by the organizational behavior which largely depends on individual differences.

For instance, individual differences help us understand why some individuals fear or embrace change. Or why the productivity of certain staff increases or decreases when they are watched closely by their higher authorities. Or why some are a fast learner in comparison to their colleagues. Individual Differences influences almost every part of the organizational actions (Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson, 2007, p. 61). Planning and Playing Game: The personality assessments reflect in the behaviors participants Introduction The accomplishment of a company and a person are created by the organizational performance that largely depends on individual dissimilarities.

The surroundings, individuality, requirements, and perception of other people and the world differ from person to person. Individual views play a huge role in a person behavior. Persons with diverse personalities relate in their own way with superiors, associates, juniors, and consumers ((Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson, 2007, p. 61). Game theory is related to communication between an organization and different individuals through a medium of the game. It a set of ideas under specific rules that are focused on making the decision in divergence and rivalry situations.

It utilizes strategic games where two or more competitors face the choice of action where they can gain or lose depending on the choices they make and the final result is decided in cooperation by strategies used by every contender, thus helping an organization to understand individual differences and work behavior (www. businessdictionary. com). On the other hand personality test gives a series of questions with multiple options related to behavior and answers to these questions helps in evaluating a person personality (Myers Briggs Personality Test, www. myersbriggs. org).

This essay will help us analyze the individual dissimilarities and work performance of various participants through the medium of a game (Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson, 2007, p. 61). To understand different individual behaviors we played the Sown Drifting Game which is based on the idea of the classic prisoner’ s dilemma. To understand the concept I chose 4 participants (Anya, Sherry, John and Marie) and gave each of them a code (INTJ, ISFJ, ISTJ, and ENTJ respectively). I was the leader in this game (www. keirsey. com, www. myersbriggs. org). The circumstance of the Snowdrift game entails two drivers who are ensnared on reverse areas of a snowdrift.

Both have the opportunity of waiting in the vehicle or spading snow to clear a lane. Allowing the challenger does the entire work is the finest alternative (resulting in a reward of $20), but by spading alone whilst the challenger sits in the vehicle give a chance of earning an extra $10. (Either both can sit or spade and earn $0 or $20 respectively (Kü mmerli (2007, www. physorg. com).


Definition of Game Theory-

George &. Jones (2006), Outlines & Highlights for Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (4th Edition), (cram101 Textbook Outlines), Publisher: Academic Internet Publishers, Publishing Date: 2006-10-26, page 70

Jennifer M. George, Gareth Jones, (2007) Understanding And Managing Organizational Behavior (5th Edition), Publisher- Prentice Hall, Date of Publication- 2007-03-10, pages 98-101

Jennifer M. George, Gareth Jones, (2007) Understanding And Managing Organizational Behavior (2nd Edition), Publisher- Addison-wesley, Date of Publication- 1998-08, page 67-98.

John Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske and Michael Matteson, 2007. Organizational Behavior and Management (8th Edition), Publisher : McGrawl Hill, Date of Publication- 2/3/2007, pages- 624, pages-61-84.

Kümmerli, Rolf, Colliard, Caroline, Fiechter, Nicolas, Petitpierre, Blaise, Russier, Flavien, and Keller, Laurent, 2007. “Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Proc. R. Soc. B, doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0793.

Keirsey Personality Test on

Myers Briggs Personality Test on

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us