The paper “ Project Management for Liaison Access and Community - Cost Breakdown Structure and Key Performance Indicators” is an apposite example of a case study on the management. The project 6 that is Liaison access and community plan entails the Liaison with private landholders, Obtain access to private landholding by Negotiate leases, Sign leases and compensation of landowners, Obtain federal approval and communication bout the project to the community. ObjectivesThe purpose of the project is to effectively address the land for the entire project. This project meets to benefit of the landowners who will lose their land to the project.
The projects will start on 8th June 2015. Work breakdown structureThis process relies on the work break down structure that is decomposed to output the activity list and work break down structure updates (Schwalbe 2010). This is the step where a graphical representation of the project hierarchy is made. Such illustrations help the project management team to look at the project from different angles and identify potential loopholes in the project. This bird-eye view of the project helps create reference points for various activities required in the project phases.
This is followed by another best practice of ‘ verifying the scope and getting the feedback’ . Since timeliness is a crucial component of projects, verification of the scope is also critical in the progress of the project cycle. Thus verification can be done as each major task is completed in the case of a long project. However, for a small project which is not phased, it can be done after the completion of the whole project. Verification involves getting express comments on the project. On the other hand feedback counts for getting customer opinions which are invaluable for continuous improvement in future projects.
Last is the best practice of monitoring and controlling the scope. Here, the actual management and controlling of the project take place to ensure that work is carried out under the decided scope. It aims to avoid, as much as possible, the possibility of adding to the scope. To work on this, there should be a good change management process and in case of changes the budgeting and schedule should be adjusted Ms.
Project. Project basis 1. Evaluation and recommendations. 2. Project charter development 3. Charter submission 4. Surveying the area 5. Evaluation and recommendations 6. Project charter development 7.Kickoff Meeting Plan 8. meet owners 9. Project charter review 10. Project charter approval Feasibility study 1 Evaluation and recommendations. 2 feasibility report writing 3. report submission 4. feasibility report review 5. feasibility report approval Environmental approval 1.Vegetation loss 2.disposal of waste 3.Infrastructure facilities 4.social impact assessment Concept/feedback 1.Permit and other legal obligation 2.Selection and oversight of architects 3.Budgeting and cost allocation 4.Stakeholders meeting Detailed design 1.Preliminary design 2.Landscaping Design 3.plant Design 4.Stakeholders meeting 5.Approval Design Work 6.Final Design Construction 1.Building material acquisition 2.water treatment plant 3.buildings 4.drilling infrastructure 5.road infrastructure 6.pipeline infrastructure 7.progress report Commissioning 1.project assessment reporting 2.Final Report 3.Grand opening Assumptions: The project will take 18 days to complete The project team will be working eight hours six days a week excluding Saturday and Sunday There are enough resources to ensure that the project goes to completion Cost breakdown structure (CBS)Prior to the implementation of this project, Liaison's access and community plan will be carried out to determine if the project was feasible or not.
Through frequent meetings with the stakeholders and other staff members of the company amount their land compensation to award. The project is projected to cost at least $41,461,000. Below are cost estimates for the project. Level 3 Level 4 Project basis Project charter development Charter submission Surveying the area Evaluation and recommendations Project charter development Kickoff meeting plan Meet owners Project charter review Project charter approval 60,000 6,000 600,000 20,000 0.00 6,000 6,000 0.00 0.00 Feasibility Negotiate leases Evaluation and recommendations Sign leases Organize compensation Make compensation Feasibility report writing Report submission Feasibility submission Feasibility report approval 6,000 6,000 20,000 20,000,000 60,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Environmental approval Vegetation loss Disposal of waste Infrastructure facilities report Social impact assessment 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000 Concept/feedback Permit and other legal obligations Selection and oversight architects Budgeting and closed allocation Stakeholders meeting 6,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 Detailed design Preliminary design Landscaping design Plants design Stakeholders meeting Approval of design Final design 60,000 30,000 30,000 6,000 1,000 20,000 Construction Building materials acquisition Water plant Buildings 2,500,000 10,000,000 2,000,000 Drilling infrastructure Road infrastructure Pipeline infrastructure Progress report 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 6,000 Commissioning Project assessment Final report Grand opening 2,500 2,500 6,000 Total 41,461,000 Project management is a process where the project manager has to balance the competing aspects of cost, time, and quality and ensure that the project is delivered according to schedule, without cost overruns, and without major glitches.
The planning stage is critical for project managers since it involves laying down a procedure to be followed. In conclusion, the project manager is like a conductor in the orchestra where he or she wields the baton of project management to make the other performers actualize the performance.