The paper "Rationales and Strategies for Organizational Change " is a perfect example of a management assignment. Despite being among the top ten groups in innovation, Business Consulting Group (BCG) has had to make considerable adjustments to its operations as it was disappointed with the returns on the investments in their business area. The main focus of the firm was to identify the major hurdles to innovation that many companies face in this age. Among the reasons given for the need for change included the lack of dynamism in their innovativeness that is able to meet the ever-changing consumer needs which keep shifting.
Secondly, the comprehensive outsourcing and the open-source software has made it the purpose for all the companies that need to attain the formulated goals and meet competitive profits to move with speed. Thirdly, BCG, from their survey findings, identified the lack of coordination as a stumbling block to innovation. To counter this, BCG recognized the prerequisite for it not to employ only the lip service strategies in the breaking down of silos but in addition, create clear communication models and create environments that will enhance teamwork and collaboration.
In addition, workers represented on the organizational chart are to be teamed up and give rewards based on innovations (Bloomberg Business, 2006). The Conference Board Review For meaningful change to occur in an organization there has to be a talented leadership. The leadership should be able to solve the complex problems that emerge and be able to formulate strategies that will be able to meet the growing needs of the future. Among the problems faced by General Motors (GM) in the USA is the alignment of leadership that has a long term strategy.
The leadership as identified lacked the ability to adapt to change given the nature of the ever-dynamic environment, failing to put down the laid down strategies into practice and failing to reinvent themselves to meet the growing future demands. GM realized that 2/3 of the planned initiatives by the firm failed to materialize as most of the formulated strategies were not successfully implemented. 95% of the employees were unaware of the organization's strategies. This to them is the lack of commitment from the leadership in ensuring the formulated plans and strategies are successfully implemented. To avert this, GM made it a deliberate attempt to create awareness of the organization’ s business strategies to the senior executives.
This will be able to create and develop an understanding of the top management with the skills and knowledge of what the organization is to do and achieve. The understanding of the organization’ s strategies by the top management will enable the firm to boost its output levels to meet the growing demands of the consumer needs.
GM had to carry out an assessment of the leadership capabilities in comparison with those that the firm needed in the future. This was to enable the organization to set clear and attainable leadership strategies that were required to meet the ever-growing future needs. This was done by conducting a SWOT analysis of the company.
Ernst & Young, 2011, EMEIA Tax T-magazine: Tax insight for business leaders, accessed on the 14th April 2011 from, http://tmagportal.ey1.dedicated.nines.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/TMagazine_03_2011_web.pdf
Pasmore, W, summer 2010, the conference board review who will run your company: Aligning leadership development with long-term strategy, accessed on the 14th April 2011 from: http://www.tcbreview.com/who-will-run-your-company.php
Green, W. et al , 2006, ‘the impact of strategic human resource management on firm performance and hr professionals’ work attitude and work performance,’ International journal of human resource management, 8, 3, 263–276.
Katou, A. & Budhwar, P, 2006, ‘the effect of human resource management systems on organizational performance: test of a mediating model,’ International journal of human resource management, 17, 7, 1223–1253.
Paauwe, J & Boselie, P, 2005, ‘best practices . . . in spite of performance: just a matter of imitation?,’International journal of human resource management, 16, 987–1003.
Ramaswamy, E & Schiphorst, F, 2000, ‘human resource management, trade unions and empowerment: two cases from india,’ International journal of human resource management, 11, 4, 664–680.
Richard, O & Johnson, N, 2001, ‘strategic human resource management effectiveness and firm performance, ‘International journal of human resource management, 12, 2, 299–310.
Tsai, C, 2006, ‘high performance work systems and organizational performance: an empirical study of taiwan’s semiconductor design firms,’ International journal of human resource management, 17, 9, 1512–1530.
Wright, P & Boswell, W, 2002, ‘desegregating hrm: a review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research,’ Journal of management, 28, 3, 247–276.
Wright, P, et al. 2005, ‘new models of strategic hrm in a global context,’ International journal of human resource management, 16, 875–881.
Business Week, April 24, 2006, The world's most innovative companies, accessed on the 14th April 2011 from: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_17/b3981401.htm