Essays on Strategic Human Resource Management - Google Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Strategic Human Resource Management - Google" is a good example of a management case study. The emergence of Google is traceable Sergey Brin and Larry Page met at Stanford University in 1995. In 1996, they initiated a search engine operating on Stanford servers called BackRub. In 1997, the duo decided to rename the company Google. Presently, the company is about 14 years old and with more than 30, 000 employees worldwide. The firm has its headquarters in Mountain View, California. Moreover, it has 70 offices in more than 40 countries worldwide.

The company is an information communication and technology-based company focusing on different perspectives based on the goal of their operation of making it easy to find information. The company engages in computer systems design and online information services. Their business operations have different scopes with numerous products. The first scope is on web based services like a web search engine, Google chrome browser, media for image, home & office for creating and sharing online documents, specialised searches like blogs & alerts, social for sharing mailing lists and discussion groups, scholarly for searching scholarly papers.

The second focus is on business fraternity. These include advertising, publishing, cloud computing and website optimization (Google, 2012). 2.0 Google’ s Strategy Ireland & Hitt (2005, p. 68); Thompson, Strickland and Gamble (2005) posits that the anchor of any successful business organization relies on the ability of its top management to formulate and boldly execute strategies. According to Henry (2008, p. 141) firms should strategize in relation to their mission, industry, resources and competitive position. These considerations are crucial as they aide in crafting executable strategies aimed at giving an organization a competitive advantage against business rivals.

Before looking at the strategy, lets first look at what shapes Google’ s corporate strategy as explained above. The first is the mission which is to “ organise the world’ s information and make it universally accessible and useful” (Google, 2012).

References

Aras, G and Crowther, D 2009, Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 279-288.

Armstrong, H and Murlis, M 2007, Reward management: a handbook of remuneration strategy and practice, Kogan Page, London.

Bacal, R 2012, Performance management, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Bernstein, D 2011, Essential of psychology, Cengage Learning, Belmont.

CNN money 2012, 100 best companies to work for 2007, viewed May 10, 2012 from http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2007/snapshots/1.html

Compton, R 2009, Towards an Integrated Model of Strategic Human Resource Management – An Australian Case Study, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 81-93.

Daft, R., Murphy, J and Willmott, H 2010, Organisation theory and design, Cengage Learning, Hampshire.

Denning, S 2000, Practice of workplace participation: management-employee relations at three participatory firms, Greenwood publishing group, West port.

Geraghty, L 2010, Sustainability reporting - measure to manage, manage to change. Keeping Good Companies, No. 3, P. 141-145.

Google 2012, Company overview, viewed May 10, 2012 from http://www.google.com/about/company/

Henry, A 2008, Understanding Strategic Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Horwitz, S and Horwitz, I 2007, The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta- Analytic Review of team Demography, Journal of Management, vol. 33, no.1, p. 987- 1015.

Ireland, R & Hitt, M 2005, Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 63-77.

Koontz, H and Weihrich, H 2008, Essentials of management: an international perspective, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.

Lakomski, G 2005, Managing without leadership: towards a theory of organizational functioning, Elsevier, Andover, Amsterdan.

Lansbury, R 2000, Work place change and employment relations in Australia: prospects for a new social partnership. The drawing board: an Australian review of public affairs. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29-45

Sims, R & Gegez, A 2004, Attitudes Towards Business Ethics: A Five Nation Comparative Study, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 50, pp. 253–265

Strickland, J 2012, How the Googleplex works, viewed May 10, 2012 from http://computer.howstuffworks.com/googleplex3.htm

Thompson, A., Strickland, A and Gamble, J 2005, Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, Concepts and Cases, McGraw- Hill, New York.

Tung, R 2001, Learning from world class companies, Cengage Learning, London.

Weightman, J 2004, Managing people, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.

Zammuto, R 1982, Assessing organisational effectiveness: systems change, adaptation and strategy, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us