The paper “ Team Work and Management Theories” is a forceful example of a literature review on human resources. Teamwork, as defined by Wilson and Corlett, is working collaboratively with a group of persons so as to realize the set goal. Without a doubt, teamwork is normally an important element of a business, as it is repeatedly essential for workmates to work collaboratively. Therefore, teamwork connotes that members of a team will try to work together, through their personal skills in addition to offering beneficial feedback, in spite of any individual disagreement between team members.
Teamwork is popular because it offers the company as well as members the ability to grow to be more accustomed to one another as well as learn how to collaborate. There are numerous reasons why teamwork is vital and important to the success of any organization as well as to employee development. Comprehending those crucial elements can help in developing policies of the company geared toward supporting team growth within the place of work. History of teamwork dates back the to late 1920s and early 1930s during the Hawthorne Experiments performed by Professor Elton Mayo, who established that employee productivity heightened with the psychological motivation of feeling involved, being given attention, and feeling important(Robbins & Coulter, 2007, p. 37).
Basically, teamwork is important for employee morale, retention as well as output quality, and importantly competence is increased significantly by using teamwork rather than working alone. As mentioned by Tracey (2003, p. 368), team projects boost motivation and lessen job-related stress. However, the reason, why teamwork is not good, is when it comes to a time of performance review, which concentrates individual performance rather than team performance.
Compelling a top-performing employee to join a team full of unproductive members can truly obstruct his/her performance. The essay seeks to use theories and examples supporting and not supporting teamwork to show the benefits of teamwork and the negative points against teamwork. Main Body Scores of organizational leaders pursue the ideology that integrating teams into the multifaceted organizational structure can make the company more successful. This ideology has transformed the landscape of the organization, as it emerges that teams are at the moment a consistent and prevalent part of nearly all organizations.
So, for organizations to become more successful in their domain, they have to rely more on their teams’ effectiveness. Collaborative teamwork is increasingly imperative given that it takes place when the organization management is concentrating on problem-solving, learning and coordination (McCallin & McCallin, 2009, p. 61). Effective control of teamwork allows for understanding the team roles and group norms, conflict resolution as well as the ability to goal setting and the readiness to collaborate. The keys to improving a harmonious and effective team may be summarized in two words: training as well as education.
All team members must value the complete necessity for discipline which is achieved through intense practice, self-improvement, as well as positive training and education. Evidently, as mentioned by Katzenbach and Smith (2005), creating a disciplined approach to teamwork is by thinking about teams as separate performance units and not only as positive sets of values. The real meaning of a team is common dedication and this cannot be achieved without disciplines, so discipline allows members of the team to perform as individuals; thus, becoming an influential unit of collective performance.